I know the 5 minute edit time has been discussed a million times before...

[halfassedjediknight]

i vote no on sarcasm

[Samwhore]

sarcasm is one of the boards weak points

[halfassedjediknight]

is it?

[Primus]

Not trying to start anything, this is out of sheer curiosity..

Why is there a 5 minute time limit to begin with?

I've been to a lot of forums and I've never seen such a thing, so I'm just wondering why impose such a limit?

(I'm not arguing for, or against it, I'm just curious why)

[Its a Plant]

Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit...a lil FYI...

Hehe, just playin' s. whore..:jointsmile:

[suhl]

five minutes is good, but id like six minutes, think you can swing that boys?

make it happen!

[Bob the Awesome]

While we're at 6, can we get maybe 7? How about 10?


Oooh, and while we're at 10, I think 15 sounds more reasonable..

Why not 30? No reason not to have 30

*rambles on and on*

[Its a Plant]

That...OR...it really isn't a big deal..

There are more important things that should be dealt with first. ~

[latewood]

a vote for BF is a vote for BF, equality isnt running for mod

roflmao

[latewood]

One of the main reasons for the 5 minute edit is because of all the backbiting and tattle-taling that goes on each and every day. If the edit time was increased a member could edit his BS away therefore making it even a bigger pain in the butt to resolve. that is one of the older answers that have been passed down. The other is

Preview Post. Peace