Results 31 to 40 of 73
-
03-22-2007, 05:07 PM #31
Senior Member
Get out
Come on now.......this is about Iraq where 70% of the country was being held under the gun right? The Kurds and 99% of the Shiite were thankful for what we did. Now we just have to rid the assclowns out of there.
Originally Posted by Zimzum
IF we were invaded by a hostile force.....hell yes I'd fight. IF we were being liberated from a "facist regime" and my neighbors were blowing up my OTHER friends AND their kids.....that would be MUCH different.
BUT..........when did we invade Iran and Saudi Arabia?
Have a good one!:s4:
-
03-22-2007, 05:24 PM #32
Senior Member
Get out
"Come on now.......this is about Iraq where 70% of the country was being held under the gun right?"
Yes, but atleast with a gun its only as good as who aims it. Now these people shop in a market with the fear that the person next to them might blow themselves up. Did we really help them by trading one fear for another?
"IF we were invaded by a hostile force.....hell yes I'd fight. "
:thumbsup:
-
03-22-2007, 09:04 PM #33
Senior Member
Get out
Depends where ya live over there. Are ya in the northern Kurdish area where they'd kick people out of their homes in Kirkuk and replace them with Sunni? Or the other Kurds that they exterminated with chemical weapons? Or the Shiite in the south that lost its agriculture because Saddam damned off the wetlands? Between the chemical weapons and starvation MOST of the country is VERY pleased to see his ass gone.
Originally Posted by Zimzum
Of course they don't like our being there but they also realize that if we were to leave it would be outright chaos. Basically, were are the better of the two evils at present.
Have a good one!:s4:
-
03-22-2007, 10:16 PM #34
Senior Member
Get out
Spring '08, if I had to guess.
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
\"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will, within limits drawn by the equal rights of others. I do not add \"within the limits of the law\', because law if often but the tyrant\'s will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.\"-Thomas Jefferson.
-
03-23-2007, 03:14 PM #35
Senior Member
Get out
Seargent Slaughter was the best wrestler ever, imo.
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
And yes at the end of the day, wrestling is just entertainment, but so is this film. Also i did used to prefer it back when they used to at least pretend it was real...some of the antics these days are verging on terminal silliness.
legend.
-
03-24-2007, 12:12 AM #36
OPSenior Member
Get out
So, whats the answer? kill all the radicals. That would be like trying to kill all the neocons here. I think there might be a neocon or two within a couple a miles of my place, so just drop a bomb that would get both of them, and kill everyone else, doesn't compute. you could invite hundreds of thousands to a stadium and blow it up, but after the first one they would be wise to it. Drop a Bomb on Mecca at Haj. would get a few, but really, what is the answer. You can't just kill every muslim on the face of the earth, even if you want to. Maybe you could poison the water. Neutron bombs, anthrax, nerve gas, etc. and then we'd be no better than Sadam. If you kill one of the leaders, that just pisses them off more. So let me hear the answer from some neocons, you guys have all the answers.
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
-
03-24-2007, 01:48 AM #37
Senior Member
Get out
PSYCHO4BUD first of Bush invade Iraq not to liberate the Iraq people he couldnt give a shit about them.You know why i know , well if Saddam was a dictator of a African country you think American soldiars would be dying i think not.He invaded that country for oil and money plain and simple.You seem to think the Iraq people are better of now than when Saddam was in power,how absurd.I guess the Iraq people fleeing the country dont know how good they have it.Or the hundreds of thousands of Iraq's who are dead why dont you ask their families if they are better off.Where are the WMD's their wasnt any and Bush and the neo-cons new that they just picked and choosed the type of intelliegence to use.But Bush and the Neo-Cons once they get thrown out of office will be charged for war crimes and crimes against humanity that you can count on.
-
03-24-2007, 06:46 AM #38
OPSenior Member
Get out
Hell, the cowardly democrats don't even have the balls to start impeachment and cut off war funding. There is way too much coruption and graft in congress to lynch one of their own. To get to Bush-Cheney, you'd have to trick them into going to the Haig and arrest them there, Maybe we could rendition them,~LOL~
Originally Posted by fishman3811
-
03-24-2007, 06:37 PM #39
Senior Member
Get out
Well Rummy cancelled his trip to Germany once he found out a group of lawyers were going to charge him with war crimes.So it doesnt have to be the democrates who charge them it can be any country,furthermore i dont think the democrates have the balls to charge anyone for war crimes.Anyway Bush just signed a law saying that him or the adminastration cant be charged for war crimes.But that doesnt make him immune to international law,so if anyone of those criminals leave the U.S.A someone or some country could grab them and take him back to tha Hague for war crimes.The Nazis werent immune after the war and neither will these criminals.
-
03-25-2007, 10:50 PM #40
OPSenior Member
Get out
I've got it, We'll tell them they've won an all expense paid trip to amsterdam, with all the underage boys or girls they can use (Bush-Cheney) and have them arrested when they step off the plane, welcome to your new life, behind bars. I'll chip in on the plane fare, anyone else.
Originally Posted by fishman3811








Register To Reply
Staff Online