another intelligent 9-11 debate

[Psycho4Bud]

so in other words, you can not refute it either?

good job.:thumbsup:

LMAO! I fought that war in politics WAY before you were a member....I passed the torch over to Zimzum now.

Fact is I learned that someone could have an apple set in front of them and if they were impressionable enough, they could be convinced VERY easily that it was an orange. Well, you have fun with the oranges and best of luck to Zim.....he needs it!

Have a good one!:s4:

Psycho4Bud Reviewed by Psycho4Bud on 03-24-2007. another intelligent 9-11 debate since the info in the last thread hit so close to home that instead of locking the thread, it had to be deleted, can not let the truth air out for too long. i will be complete in my research here, done MOSTLY with the us governments OWN reports. let us start with understanding what a "theory" is. so in other words, for the government's theory of how the wtc buildings failed, it has to have happened before or be able to be tested and acheive the same results. Rating: 5