another intelligent 9-11 debate

[AlwaysBlazed]

Fact is I learned that someone could have an apple set in front of them and if they were impressionable enough, they could be convinced VERY easily that it was an orange. Well, you have fun with the oranges and best of luck to Zim.....he needs it!

Cmon, you cannot compare looking at documented information to tricking a normal person that an apple was an orange. Fact is, most americans dont give a shit, so why would they go online and look at the facts when the government just told them the simple story.
:hippy:

AlwaysBlazed Reviewed by AlwaysBlazed on 03-24-2007. another intelligent 9-11 debate since the info in the last thread hit so close to home that instead of locking the thread, it had to be deleted, can not let the truth air out for too long. i will be complete in my research here, done MOSTLY with the us governments OWN reports. let us start with understanding what a "theory" is. so in other words, for the government's theory of how the wtc buildings failed, it has to have happened before or be able to be tested and acheive the same results. Rating: 5

[Psycho4Bud]

Cmon, you cannot compare looking at documented information to tricking a normal person that an apple was an orange. Fact is, most americans dont give a shit, so why would they go online and look at the facts when the government just told them the simple story.
:hippy:

LMAO! And any information that either myself, Zimzum, or BA provides is accused of being from a government run organization. But of course ALL information that says that the U.S. and Bush are evil is considered fact. Like I stated before........good luck Zimzum, carry the torch for us old timers.

Have a good one!:s4: