Printable View
ok i was listening to a podcast a few days ago by the dope fiend and he said something about how bong rips are actually worse for you than SMOKING A BLUNT in some cases
i had ALWAYS thought bong rips were wayyyy better for you becuase of the water filtration, so this statement really intrigued me
anyone hear of this? or have any other info on it??
First of all you hear it from someone named Dope Fiend so you take anything he says with a grain of salt. Second, UM is that University of Michigan? If so, fuck michigan, if not, nevermind.
the water filters the smoke, you aren't smoking the tobacco leaf paper, and you are still inhaling smoke. maybe just the quantity of smoke is bad, but if you smoke a blunt or X amount of bong rips with the same weed, its going to be the same smoke, but the bong rips will be cleaner after being filtered through the water. i don't see how it could be any worse for you.
smoking blunts is way worse than rippin tubes.
really think about it... blunts are nasty
no.
directed towards fucknut
ohh i mean bucknut, my bad...
honestly, i heard bong rips are worse...Quote:
Originally Posted by dejayou30
I REALLY wanna find some more info on this. im thinking it has to do with the amount of smoke you take in. idk about you guys but i take as big of bong rip as my lungs can hold... so maybe it chalks up your lungs easier and gets caught in your tissue???? thats probably not the case, someone help me out on this one
Consider this; how is either one actually good for your lungs? so does it really matter if one is a bit worse off then the other? Smoke MJ the way ya like it, thats the bottom line :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMrocksmysocks
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHH AHAHAH
PENN STATE all the way. :D :D
In a way, bong rips are worse, because you have the flame on the weed for each hit, whereas blunts are cherried.
Zing! Ya caught me with a zinger there. Penn State...just another game on the schedule.
And dude, yer an idiot. Blunts are WAY worse. Blunts, there is NOTHING filtering the smoke, plus you are smoking tobacco as well. Trust me. I used to smoke blunts exclusivley and after awhile you start hacking up black shit from yer lungs. Never had that happen since I stopped smoking so many blunts and started using my bong more. Vapo is the best way to smoke though, nothing compares to the volcano, finally got to try it out this weekend, and WOW!
What the fuck is the world coming to when its the fucking pot smokers making up propaganda? About the substance they know and love, nonetheless.
wha?
lick my balls man, i didnt say blunts were better for you,,, i heard it in a podcast and from a guy that knows his shit about cannabis.. and why the fuck would you smoke a blunt with tobacco in it:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by bucknuts1870
at the end of the day, smoking it any ways not good for you,so why be concerned about the particular methods?
just smoke that shit...
dude a blunt is a cigar, a cigar is tobacco.
this guys a dumbass, he dont know what hes talking about.
if the arguement is that you take bigger hits or more smoke out of a bong than a blunt hasnt smoked a blunt with me!
I roll blunts with dutch masters... and i use the paper and the tobacco leaf.
Plus if you weren't the one who rolled it then your smoking something that someone else slobbered all over...
I'm not complaining but that why i think blunts are nasty. I would rather smoke the pHx any day.
Can't smoke bongs.
Fuckers burn my lugs bad. Just after one hit too.
I'll hit it...cough for an hour, and my drool just comes rushing out as if I had just got botox injection into my lips.
Don't know why.
cause youre nto used to having smoke that DEEP in your lungs prolly. ive seen guys who can kill half a joint in a hit, cough their asses off on a modest hit from a bong, just cause theyre not used to having ALL of their lung capactiy packed with smoke.
i think hes refering to the NORML funded test that concluded that a unfiltered joint was the msot efficient method of extracting THC. However i also remmeber reading in that report that they found while tehcnichally a bong should be less healthy, waterpipe smokers experienced less throat/lung irritation. either way, were talking a negligable health effect here. In fact in another study done among mroe than 1000 LA residents, even those who smoked a joint a day for 60 years, had less of a correllation with lung cancer than non smokers!
check my research if you want.
(uh oh the first link has michigan in it hahaha*cue irony bell*)Study fails to find link between marijuana use and cancer
NORML New Zealand - Marijuana Water pipe and Vapouriser study
happy reading :)
I'll bet you that this 'dopefiend' smokes blunts.. think logically about it.
that doesn't sound too right to me. i'd just ignore him, assuming he doesn't have some killer good excuse to back it up.
They were actually talking about thc v tar ratios as bongs filter more thc then they do tar.
as the smoke travels thru the blunt the other weed filters the smoke
umm captain hanks, thc is non soluble in water.
And you continue to smoke what it filters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Odweeds
did u not read the post like 4 or 5 ^? NORML New Zealand - Marijuana Water pipe and Vapouriser studyQuote:
Originally Posted by sam44
umm.. wrong. thc is mildly soluble in water and according to a norml study, a water bong filters out more thc than tar.Quote:
Originally Posted by sam44