Originally Posted by TokinAsianGuy
oh i never said they wouldn't be used. but i tell you now grasshopper, these weapons cannot destroy earth 10 times over. you don't have to trust me to believe me, just have some common sense.
You seriously don't think anyone on this planet has a weapon capable of taking out a chunk of a country? Because if that weapon does exist, then most likely there are more than 1 of it exist.
boo hoo, nuclear war is going to be the end of us all. not likely, it'll kill alot of humans and damage the earth, but take a look at how much japan has prospered since they were attacked... and you're definitely right, history will repeat itself. we will keep fighting, and people will keep dying, kamikaze style... but eventually, like i said, the "big picture", when the armed forces of the world are exhausted, they will eventually turn their focus onto other things. for example, better filtration technology to filter out the radioactive particles that is in water... (after the nuclear weapons have blown a few pock mocks on the earths surface)
I don't think you see what I'm getting at...history repeats itself, yes. 1000 years ago history repeated itself as wars were fought using swords and sheilds. 100 years ago they were fought using (weak) firearms. Not too long ago they were fought using a bomb that could take out a small country (which you mentioned with Japan). You see what's happening? Weapons are getting more deadly -- and quickly.
I refuse to believe if even half the warheads on the earth were detonated right now that this planet would be able to withstand it. You are counting on the armed forces becoming exhausted while the rest of us are counting on the armed forces to keep bettering their weapons. You think they will find a good weapon and say "meh, this is pretty good, I say we stick with this forever now." Unlikely
Yes. everything "cools off" eventually. it's a fact.
More often than not on a global scale involving religion, weapons, and freedom, it cools off by boiling over, if you know what I mean.
Yes, and English, and that was a very weak attempt at being condescending.
Well that was a very weak attempt at picking up condescention, because there was none of it coming from me.
people say alot of things don't they? :p
I suppose :stoned:
if you want to believe that every event that's occuring right now is building up to bring on the "end of the world", "judgement day", "the dawn of the dead", whatever, be a drama queen. but when you realise that it's just another anti climactic battle, i hope you remember what i've said on christmas eve 2006, and smile because you know what? everything is gonna be alright even though we have to go through some rough ass shit first.
Ah yes, I am a drama queen for seeing reality clearly. Here it is for you, and this time I will you some condescention:
- weapons blow things up
- weapons that already existed and are proven to be deadly have obviously been refined over the last 50 years
- therefore, a weapon that will blow LARGER amounts up
- also, most likely more than 1 country are the proud owner of this weapon, some maybe even enemies
If it's not the this war that is fatal to this planet, it will be the next one, or the one after that. I cannot envision a war in the future that would lead to those being bombed becoming more prosperous like Japan as you mentioned. I just don't see it happening.