Why was the thread deleted
Printable View
Why was the thread deleted
My theory: This site doesn't belong to it's members. Cannabis.com doesn't want repercussions from a DEA agent becuase one of it's members said something... stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by senoirsalsa
My guess...because it contained very little fact and was the digital equivalent of mooning a police officer while you give him the finger.
But hey, I could be wrong...
We all saw it........heads up to the assholes that do that shit in here. The link was posted on that site........hey, mellow is a better way to handle the man.
Have a good one!:thumbsup:
How are we assholes. What exactly did we do wrong, and how was it wrong.
I wasn't the one who posted that on the cop site by the way.
Big diference between disrespecting law enforcement with rude gestures, and being pro-weed.
lmfaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Big Calhoun
those 2 threads on that fourm were compleatly pointless, the people on there have no idea about anything, they need to look into the subject before trying to put it down
There was something suspicious about the way the "woman" worded her complaint to that site.
I believe it to be a former disgrunteled member here more than likely a male, posing as a woman with concerns about her kid to manipulate the police with a fabricated story.
That particular site was posted about 8 months ago on here.
Someone saw that site, remembered it and went back to it to post on it. What are the odds that a concerned mother would go to THAT particular site.
It was a former member of our boards who got banned. More than likely a male.
Doesn't make sense why someone would be banned for posting their daughter's age.
Somehow, I think P4B was referring to the perverts soliciting underage girls for sex and offering drugs.Quote:
Originally Posted by FeastonThisSHITT
Again, I could be wrong...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Calhoun
Oh, if that is the case nevermind :P
That was EXACTLY the case! Some dumb son of a bitch on here looking for an underage pot whore.......GET REAL! If I knew who it was the fuck would be banned for life.:mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by FeastonThisSHITT
Have a good one!:thumbsup:
the dea or w/e cant even do anything about all of this so i have no worrys
LOL... I thought it was my little micky jingle that closed it...Quote:
Originally Posted by senoirsalsa
i have no idea whats goin on....
Yeah, so, the question still remains... why was the thread closed?
Well I'm not sure why the thread was deleted, but if someone is looking for an underage pot whore, then he should have his testicles removed and forced down his throat. I mean come on you have to be a fat desperate idiot with no confidence at all to do something like that.
but again, i'm not sure why the thread was deleted. if it's because it's the digital equivelant of mooning a DEA agent while giving the finger, then I must admit, I'd do it in real life if I had the chance :)
underage pot whore?
did someone give money to a 15 yr old... in exchange for naughty and crude favors?
That happens all too often on the internet. Doesn't mean it happened here tho.Quote:
Originally Posted by dryst
Ick. Just thinking of pervs being around makes me itch.:mad:
Let me just share a quote,saying I like to use a lot when someone farted...
Who ever smelt it dealt it...
:cool: It was deleted because I felt it was just gonna lead to nothing but nastiness. Salsa I did not do it to piss you off I simply was trying to avoid a thread that was going to have to be watched and monitored the whole time.
I appreciate your understanding with this......:thumbsup:
Yeah definitely avoid watching and monitoring threads. That just sounds like alot of work. In fact, I think they should recruit specific people whose responsibility would be just that- watching and monitoring threads. They could call them Monitorators. :dance:Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi
What's up Kiwi? Long time no see. Didn't see you or recognize many people when I dropped in chat the other night, but it's been about a year. Looks like alot has changed. Is yocass and rarr still around?
Any thread can lead to nastiness. Doesn't make sense to delete that one. May as well delete this one too because it is the same thing, minus the link.
nope, its a thread about a thread:pimp:Quote:
Originally Posted by FeastonThisSHITT
The difference is, going over there and starting shit isn't going to make us look any better. There's no point in either side fighting, we both believe strongly and it would be naive to think that we could change their outlook, just like it would be naive to think that they could change ours. Does that mean we shouldn't try? Not like this.
This isn't the first time this has happened. It happened maybe 6 months ago, and it ended badly. Some of the members from this board made us look like little kids, and that's not what we want as a community.
I'm not saying that iancurtis (if it wasn't you, sorry man, bad memory) was wrong for starting a thread over there. It wasn't actually a bad idea, because it was presented in a clean manner, and I'm sure he understands there's no point in fighting a losing battle. It's just that if we started going over there, they'll start coming here, and that would be about as lame as white bread with a glass of water on the side for dippin'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by graph
I don't think it is a losing battle.... From the looks of law changings... the battle is being won ever so slowly.
Countries are slowly easing laws on Marijuana. Maybe not the states.... but the states isn't the world.
Ever know anyone who walked into a police station, voluntarily and unsolicited (bailing out someone), with weed in their pocket, only to get busted when the cop at the reception desk said "Hmm you smell like weed. Go ahead and empty your pockets for me... yep that's weed allright, well it's convenient you're already here... take him away, boys."
Then his friend is sitting there in the cell, happy, almost singing to himself inside his head knowing he's about to be free thanks to his buddy: "yeah baybe, jason gonna bail me out, gonna bail me out and he got weed, we gonna leave this jail and smoke a fattie whoo hooo WTF dude why is jason coming back here wearing county orange too? Ahh dude wtf dude you got busted bailing me out? Ah that sucks man... did you bring anything?"
Oh, yeah sorry if I made it seem I meant everywhere. I just meant that website specifically. Over the world I think decisions are being made, but asking a bunch of what seem to be overly conservative cops to listen to pro-legalization arguments seems like a losing fight and just not worth the time or energy. I mean, we could be out handing pamphlets.Quote:
Originally Posted by FeastonThisSHITT
Nobody reads pamphlets.
i don't think there should be any conflict about it. i was just trying to bring it to everyone's attention--not trying to make people go to that website and flame them.
im so confused....
no one flamed them on there own site, we were simply called a bunch of dopers without an opinion worth hearing thoughQuote:
Originally Posted by IanCurtisWishlist
I'm curious about this thread posted at this DEA website. Is it still up there and can I see it? Or did it get deleted? I'm just curious what all hoof-dee-do is about. :)
Lemme catch you up...Quote:
Originally Posted by dryst
Apparently, there is/are some small dicked chump(s) lurking this board offering drugs in exchange for sex to underage girls. Supposedly, a mother who discovered her daughter was involved in such a situation posted a message on an LEO website seeking help.
Someone here also was on the site and noticed the post, which was about a month old I think. They in turn posted a link here, and then the games began. Basically, some bird-brained idiot decided to create an account there in order to 'respond' to that post by providing a link to the thread that existed here, last night. Probably one of the stupidest moves of all time, but whatever.
So there...this thread is the aftermath of the thread that was deleted.
Toodles.
which post was a month old? i totally don't get this. who'se the stupid bird brained idiot?:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Calhoun
lmfao, to bad that mother is thought to be a disgruntled banned member from hereQuote:
Originally Posted by Big Calhoun
ZOMG!!! No offense, but you've given me a headache. Let's try this again...slowly...Quote:
Originally Posted by IanCurtisWishlist
...that postQuote:
...Supposedly, a mother who discovered her daughter was involved in such a situation posted a message on an LEO website seeking help.
Someone here also was on the site and noticed the post, which was about a month old I think.
...that idiot, whoever that idiot may be.Quote:
They in turn posted a link here, and then the games began. Basically, some bird-brained idiot decided to create an account there in order to 'respond' to that post by providing a link to the thread that existed here, last night.
there's no flaming here Cal...Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Calhoun
Thank you for your misperception. I was flaming who again?
Yeah, that's what I thought...
Sarcasm, yes. Flaming, no.