Release of New Pentagon Video Designed to Frame The Debate

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sep...ne_release.htm

much more at that link than i posted here...

[align=left]Release of New Pentagon Video Designed to Frame The Debate [/align]
Infowars.com | May 16 2006

By Alex Jones & R. Schlickeisen

This release of a handful of frames from the Pentagon on 9/11 is a scam. It is another scam in a long line of false flags and distractions laid out by the real perpetrators of the events of September 11th. It is an attempt to regain control of the debate when so many people worldwide are waking up to the stone cold truth - the irrefutable evidence of what really happened on 9/11.


And of course it is blurry video, just as bad or worse than first five frames released by the government but it doesn't matter because the general public will hear that video of the plane hitting the Pentagon has been released and will not question it even if they haven't seen it. This is a device used to simply intensify the whole debate about the attack on the Pentagon to the exclusion of other important issues. We will debate what they want us to debate, the puppetmasters think.

[align=left]Whether or not a plane hit the Pentagon has become a divisive issue within the 9/11 Truth community. Infowars has never chosen to focus on it because the evidence surrounding the explosions in the Pentagon do not compare to the ironclad evidence we have about other aspects of 9/11. [/align]

All we have to help us understand what happened at the Pentagon is a handful of blurry frames handed over to us by the government while we have one hundred percent verification that Larry Silverstein ordered WTC building 7 to be demolished - the evidence came straight from his own mouth.

We know for a fact that the hijackers were trained at the Defense Language School.

We know for a fact that public officials were warned in advance of the attacks not to fly.

We know for a fact that NORAD stood down on the morning of 9/11.

We know for a fact that documents outlining plans for flying remote controlled aircraft into government buildings as a means of inciting war, such as Operation Northwoods, have been in circulation within the Pentagon for decades.

These smoking guns, these incredible pieces of evidence, have all been ignored by the mainstream media and government mouthpieces. It is no coinicidence that they have chosen to focus on the Pentagon. This is the reason that we know that the Pentagon debate is dangerous because the debate has been manufactured to distract from the facts.

Charlie Sheen issued a challenge to the media and to the public at large to examine the facts and look at WTC Building 7 and the five frames of the Pentagon. The media subsequently ignored this challenge, ridiculed and demonized Sheen and finally has embraced these new videos of the pentagon which are even more ridiculous than the initial "evidence" of a plane hitting the Pentagon.

All of this should show people that 9/11 was a manufactured event, carefully orchestrated to allow people to consider only what those in control want people to consider.

They cannot address the other evidence without hinting at the facts of the scam, so they concentrate on the Pentagon.

This is an obvious setup and we believe that within a few months they will release crystal clear footage and place all the weight of the 9/11 conspiracy on that video.

If this is such a trap, then we must warn people and alert them to the layers of manipulation at play here. We must show others the irrefutable evidence that the media purposefully ignores. We must reveal how this is the most heinous self-inflicted wound, the most vile false-flag operation ever perpetrated by a government on its own people.

New Pentagon Video: Eminently Ignorable

Kurt Nimmo | May 18 2006

Russell Pickering of Pentagon Research does a fine job of shooting holes in the newly released Pentagon video. â??It strikes me that something flew into the Pentagon. I donâ??t know what to say though because it also appears nearly as certain from all of the comparisons that the size, bright color and reflection of the object in the videos does not match what you would expect from a 757-200,â?� he writes. â??They could pull something solid (or apparently solid) out of the bag and ridicule us later. We should focus on the irrefutable evidence like the demolition of WTC7, the free-fall speed of the towers, Norad, PNAC etc., in other words, things that are WELL documented. The Pentagon situation is always going to be a sticky mess. I think they have made themselves look bad enough without any more help from us.â?�

In fact, the moment I managed to take a look at stills of the video, I thought precisely the same thingâ??they are attempting to motion the truth movement over on a side rail and make it look more ridiculous than it now looks, what with all the blue screen and pod nonsense floating around, about as relevant as UFOs and Big Foot.

All this â??irrefutable evidenceâ?� aside (and there is enough of it to convict our rulers and send them packing in orange jumpsuits to a small penal island somewhere in an isolated stretch of the Pacific), I believe this latest video is not worth the stream of bytes the images encapsulate. It should be studiously ignored while other, more relevant and damaging evidence (the obvious demolition of the towers and Building Seven) is brought to the forefront.

Obviously, the latest video is a transparent attemptâ??with Judicial Watch serving as an apparently willing patsyâ??to hijack the argument and make nine eleven truth seekers out to be tinfoil hatters. It is interesting to note this new video surfaced as British Labor MP Michael Meacher announced his intention to screen Dylan Averyâ??s Loose Change (a film that trounces the official version of what happened at the Pentagon on nine eleven) on June 14 at the House of Parliament. It is hoped this new video will make truth seekers and nine eleven researchers look like idiots and churls prior to this screening.

Incidentally, a Google News search of â??Michael Meacherâ?� and â??Loose Changeâ?� produces one result from UKFilm, while a general search produces a handful of results gleaned from alternative news and information sites. In short, for the corporate media, the fact members of the British government have been invited to see a documentary that effectively destroys the official version is not newsworthy, while the freshly minted bogus video, â??issued to dispel conspiracy theories,â?� receives well over 800 results from the usual suspects, including CNN, the New York Times, MSNBC, Slate, and a bevy of left gatekeepers, most notably Democracy Now.

New Pentagon video shows no Boeing airliner

Total911.info | May 18 2006

Following Freedom of Information Act lawsuits dating back to 2004, the Pentagon Tuesday released images recorded on the morning of 9/11 by two security cameras in the Pentagon parking lot. Five frames from one camera had previously been leaked in early 2002. No Boeing 757 airliner is apparent in any of the images.

The federal government had been using the Zacarias Moussaoui trial as an excuse to keep the images classified. The images were shown to jurors at the trial. 25% of the heavily-screened, pro-FedGov jury were not horrified enough by the images to lynch the retarded colored Frenchman on trial.

Whatever speed the cameras actually recorded at, the released video only contains two frames per second. The five frames of interest from one camera were previously released in 2002. They appeared to show an obscured missile-sized object approaching the Pentagon. The images of interest from the other, nearby, camera, are first, the nose of an aircraft (very similar to, say, an AGM-86A cruise missile) inching into the frame from the right, the next, a white blur blurring into an explosion. No passenger airliner is apparent in any image.

Meanwhile, the government refuses to release 84 other recordings in pending lawsuits. Among those are videos confiscated from a nearby Sheraton hotel and Citgo gas station. Cable news reporters gamely reported that those cameras were pointed the wrong the way and we would never see them. This is a lie, of course, as media reports indicated Sheraton employees watched the tape "in horror" before it was stolen by the FBI.

Presentation of this release on cablenews was preceded and accompanied by loathsome talking heads preening that "conspiracy theorists" would be proven wrong by the video. Though more than one admitted quietly that the new footage was "underwhelming."

Particularly loathsome was CNN's embedded Pentagon flack, Jamie McIntyre. McIntyre claimed up and down that he was at the Pentagon and saw the plane wreckage, that it was everywhere. Of course, his report filed on 9/11 said exactly the opposite -- and video of that report has been archived all over the web and transcribed by Total911.info, Later in the day, McIntyre attacked "conspiracy theorists" on the web, and took some of his own 9/11 report out of context in order to attack Internet researchers of taking his report out of context. McIntyre was sweaty, jumpy, and nervous -- as well he should be, given that the scope of his lies may impeach him as a war criminal.

Like Winston in Orwell's 1984, a boot beating down on his head until he agreed 2+2=5, the television showed us, between reports on the NSA spying on your phone calls, pictures of no Boeing 757 while .insisting they were showing you a Boeing airliner.

How much longer will this continue?

ffgghhhd

I think we can all safely assume now that Post 9/11 Amerika = Nazi Germany.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_GEL...h=Toby%20Keith

:thumbsup:

so the only evidence the 19 freedom hatin' muslims commanded by the guy in the cave have for their conspiracy theory, is that you're crazy to even question the feds' official conspiracy theory...that's about it.

there is that passport that flew through a burning plane, burning building to land on the ground unscathed...i forgot about that, to land neatly on pile of rubble.

we were told it existed before we were told it was just a rumor, it worked at the time though.

I find it interesting that AFTER 9/11, they found 8 of the so called "hijackers" alive and well.

^^Make up some more information

And the Gov only released that Tape because nutjobs like yourself sued to get it released.

I'm not making that up at all.... pentagonresearch.com, do some reading. The same guys that the gov. released photos of were found alive. It wasn't really 19 hijackers they said.

@myth1184 so ur saying only a nut job questions the goverment?what department do you work for,the nut jobs are people like you follow like sheep to iran,BUSH & BLAIR=MUSOLINI & HITLER