Printable View
More Remains Discovered Near WTC Site 3/28/06
-"Fire Department crews had inspected the building in the months following the attacks, but construction workers clearing gravel off the rooftop found 10 bone fragments there last fall."
-and it was a "fire" that caused them to collapse? bones shattered by ferocious flames and launched to the building's adjacent? No. What deformed humans, and launched bones was indeed explosives.
whoopie
let's see you get nailed with a jet aircraft and keep all your bones...Quote:
Originally Posted by xblackdogx
this isn't really anything new... i mean.. people knew the day it happened that the destruction of those buildings was not what they said it was...you think the buildings would've created more rubble, more damage to the surrounding buildings.... infact.. based on the force, you'd think that when the building collapsed it'd collapse at the weakest point.. causing it to fall over.. rather than into itself..
...
Only the years to come will reveal the disgusting lies and deceit that we've been force fed and beat senseless with for the last 5 years.
and maybe rats hauled off a few goodies to stash for later...
So the claim is that a fire brought the buildings down, when in fact it was a sinister explosion. I wonder if, oh, say, a plane full of jet fuel could explode?
I'll bet the rats were paid by the C.I.A. to take the bones!:stoned:Quote:
Originally Posted by del...
If it was possible for that type of explosion to make the towers collapse i would accept your theory. Fact is only three buildings EVER collapsed due to fires, mysteriously all the same day: 9/11.Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdevious
And all three buildings imploded, not exploded. Exploding would make more sense, but it didn't happen. There must have been explosions from the bottom, plus the fact that all walls of the buildig were "pulled" toward the center. Personally, I think the conspiracy theory is saying that memebers of a terrorist organization rammed planes into it. Seems more believable it was planned out by a more powerful organization.Quote:
Originally Posted by xblackdogx
Yo dude, it wasn't just some punk starting a fire in the bathroom garbage can.
IT WAS A FUCKING AIRPLANE CRASHING INTO A TOWER! Maybe, just, MAYBE, that changes the integrity of the structure. Maybe it could even, oh, I don't know, fall down if, oh, I don't know, an airplane's FULL fuel tank caught on fire.
And shit! Is is really that weird that we got attacked? I mean, fuck, we're AMERICA! I don't even have to elaborate. You know exactly what I mean.
It was an open floor design using trusses as flooring supports. When the trusses collapsed due to the heat it pulled in the building like an implosion.
The government will only tell us the truth in 100 or so years, when were all dead. No-one will give a rats ass about it then. Mind you, WW3 woulda taken care of everyone by then...
I refuse to believe it. It doesn't blame the government and my stupid-ass liberal mind can't accept that.
Dude i beleive that 9/11 was staged too.. but this article doesnt prove anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by xblackdogx
If this were all "staged", imagine how outraged the entire Moslum world would be at such an accusation. Ya know, it's not as if they love us anyways!
ehh, it does say something about the Gov'ts story... 4-5 years later they find this!... the reason i use this example is because its a recent story, and not from some 9/11 conspiracy siteQuote:
Originally Posted by Tmar.aLL.DaYmar
I am not trying to tell you what to believe about this incident, but the government is. The only thing i can say for you is research some things, learn about the melting point of steel and the burning temperature of a "FULL fuel tank" and then tell me truthfully you believe it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Funkamander
Spell muslim right. What you protray of muslims is what you see in the media, the media shows a minority, the media is also controlled. Muslims are peace lovers, the minority of extremists brings shame to their name.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Why does bush want to bomb the rest of al-jazeera?? Because that channel isn't controlled by the government. They show what the government doesnt want the public to see.
Every so often the government tells the media to broadcast a high alert message so that the public stays in that sense of fear, so they can mould the publics decisions (example: using 9/11 as a means of war with afghanistan/iraq). This is the new WORLD ORDER wether you like it or not.
To see something that will make you think about 9/11 go here
http://www.wtc7.net/
This building that was never hit by any plane collapsed because of fire, also the collapse was such a level collapse dont u think?? allmost controlled....
Furthermore the US air force usually encloses on any plane off course within minutes, these hijacked plane were off-course for about 30 minutes, where was the airforce??
On the same day the vice president had pilot simulators/training programmes running so the airforce were not able to attend to the hijacked planes.... How coincedental
I agree with ya, the majority are peace lovin' people. Which all the more proves my point about what outrage they would feel.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yous
Have a good one!:thumbsup:
i h8 talking about this fukin fukd up world.... i need some greeeeeen. fukk all i got left is ciggies......
I have to say, I used to believe that stuff. I used to think the whole 9/11 thing was staged by our own government. It just had to be. I mean, no steel buildings had ever collapsed due to fire, right?
But now that I've really looked into the whole thing, examined both sides of the story and weighed the evidence carefully, I found that I was mistaken. As evil as I think Bush and his administration is, I just can't find any good evidence that they were behind 9/11. And it turns out that hardly any of the conspiracy theorists can agree on just what the hell went on. Some people say a missile hit the Pentagon, some say it was a military drone, some say it was a remote control plane, some say it was the plane the government says it was. If it was so obvious that this was faked, wouldn't the evidence point to the same conclusions for independently working researchers?
The WTC fires were different from fires in steel structures in prior incidents. Never before had somebody crashed jets into skyscrapers like that. Nearly full tanks of jet fuel were emptied into several floors of office equipment and set on fire. And don't forget that the structures, as you may expect, were severely damaged by the gaping holes punched into the buildings by the planes. Is it so unbelievable to think that a section might weaken and collapse, and then the weight of the top of the building would cause the destruction of the building below?
if they actually released the tapes from Pentagon there would be a clear conclusion; only 1 tape has ever been released.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneironaut
Welcome to the wonderful world of the neo-cons. LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Oneironaut
I'm not a neo-con and I never will be. But I'm not going to accuse my enemies of things if I don't have hard evidence that they actually did it.
LOL....exactly....innocent until PROVEN guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt!:thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneironaut
:D :DQuote:
Originally Posted by mrdevious
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...76160&q=9%2F11
http://filmstripinternational.com/fi...lmstrip=jones2
http://groups.myspace.com/911truth
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...q=loose+change
just watch them... they are a little long, but just take the time and watch them
http://total911.info/zacmstun.wmv
this is crazy, I don't believe his testimony then [case is going on now]... and for those of you who don't know this guy, Moussaoui would have been the "20th hijacker", but US caught him in Aug 2001. BTW other detainees such as the financial advisor for al-Queda have said under oath that Moussaoui was unintelligent, and untrustworthy along with being annoying
Well i looked at both sides and am convinced 150% that it was staged by a rogue element of OUR government, maybe Bushitter didnt know anything(I doubt it)but they had this planned, ever read the Operation Northwoods doc, or better yet, read the PNAC plan, it tells everything from having a New Pearl Harbor attack to get the people behind a war, and even talks about Iraq. and the same people who created the PNAC, are the same ones that are in control of the WhiteHouse...
Well Al CIA duh said that moussaoui was inept so they cut him out- plus no telling what kind of torture they used-check out this video saying moussaoui may have been wearing a stunbelt http://www.total411.info/Quote:
Originally Posted by xblackdogx
Few points to make ....First with the amount of fuel those planes have that fire burned hot and burned for a long time...Second skyscrapers are designed to collapse in on themselves
the video your directing me to is the one i posted :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by eg420ne
They each burned for less than an hour and a half!... jet fuel burns at a maximum of 2000 deg, while it takes around 3000 to melt steel. Even if the skyscrapers are designed to collapse on themselves, they didnt not "fall" - proof= the time it took for them to fall, i believe it is around 8 seconds, thats freefall time [there has been a study on it]Quote:
Originally Posted by StashDaCash
Sign the petition to get some answers!: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takea...141667399#body
Those where 747 planes. Ive flown on a few in my life and if you saw the size of these mo fos you could see how they caused destruction. Plus the camel jockies planned it so they jacked 747s with tanks full of gas.
i agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by graph
Moussaoui has mad holes in his story. he said his partner was supposed to be richard reid(the shoe bomber) but he was in europe at the time. i think we may have a patsy or a loose end on our hands.
So what about all the deaths that occured that day? I find it hard to believe that the government would stage something that would cause so many deaths of innocent people.
Yes most of them are usually [eace loving people but with those comic strips a while back they were extremely violent. It's the Shiites(sp) who are the extremists the peacful ones are the Sunnis.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
No offense to all you conspiracy dumb asses but unless you have a degree in physics then shut the fuck up because you dont know ANYTHING.
1. Imagine how much that building weighed, and imagine all that weight being dropped thousands of feet, if that hit a person it could very well have sent a few projectile bones flying out of one of the windows, just think about it....its not even that unlikely
2. The buildings should have fallen over instead of collapsed? You sir are on some bad drugs that have completely scrambled your brains.
3. A HUGE PIECE OF ALMOST SOLID METAL FILLED WITH A HIGHLY EXPLOSIVE LIQUID SLAMS INTO A BUILDING WITH A FEW STEEL SUPPORTS THAT WERE HOLDNG UP HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CONCRETE AND DESK JOCKIES, is it safe to say that there is no possible way for something like that EVER to fall down, maybe you should get a grip on reality moron, think about how buildings start, first off a bunch of contractors make bids to build it and the lowest one gets it, the only way this contractor can provide a lower price than his competitors is to sacrifice material quality, worker wage etc which means that at least a few corners were cut during the the construction durrrrrrrrrrr.
4. I was gonna explain the implosion thing, but Phsycho4Bud did a nice job of making some of you look like asses (thanks for being way ahead of me) why would the building explode because a plane hit it? thats just stupid there was AN explosion WHEN the plane hit it, because a plane moves very fast and to do this it burns something called JETFUEL!!!!!!!! or kerosene that might just be combustible.
and im too fucking tired to finish explaining to all you dolts the simplicity of the situation because im all whacked out on percocets
Im not asking you to believe in something blindly im just telling you that the facts are there and if you ignore them then its you're own damn fault for being a retard (and looking like one)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xblackdogx
You spout out misinformation that you hear and automatically believe it to be true, jet fuel DOES burn at 2k degrees and it does take roughly 3k degrees to melt steel BUT if you werent a pathetic moron you would know that if you contain a heat source it will continue to rise
think about an oven, just a simple household oven, if you can even muster that much brain power. Now the oven heats up to set temp, then does the flame thats heating it just stay on? No but yet the oven remains at a constant temp...so what happens when you keep adding fire in that contained space in the oven? it will get hotter and hotter even if the natural gas has a max temp of 500 degrees you can still heat the oven to much hotter than that. the same SIMPLE effect could have happened in the WTC towers, what happens when you get an entire level of a building thats still almost entirely sealed off and fill it with jet fuel and spark it up??? huh i wonder :cool:
any other questions?
i'm sorry, i should have stated, jet fuel can burn at a MAXIMUM of 2000 deg... and i have no degree in science... but search 9/11 scholars, they have researched everything we are talking about. do you discredit their degrees?Quote:
Originally Posted by God v2.0
http://911review.org/ScholarsforTruthabout911/
please entertain yourself with the articles written by PHD holders
give me a chuffin break. why do you think you are right and everyone else is wrong? noone is certain what happened that day but evidence and unanswered questions point to inside job.Quote:
No offense to all you conspiracy dumb asses but unless you have a degree in physics then shut the fuck up because you dont know ANYTHING.