Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
"Clash of Civilizations" Advanced by Naive and Controlled Groups
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | February 7 2006
The riots that are currently sweeping across Europe and the Middle East in response to caricatures of Mohammed that were originally printed in Danish newspapers are staged managed and are helping the Neo-Cons advance the "clash of civilizations" that they need to impose world order and imperial hegemony.
Images of Muslims with signs that read "freedom go to hell" and "Europe, take some lessons from from 9/11" are playing right into the hands of the Globalists by enabling them to hold up examples of how the Muslims are dangerous barbarians who wish to take away our liberties and need to be dealt with.
The elite is encouraging and fostering the spread of Islamofascism throughout Europe by allowing mass immigration in increasing levels year after year. It is in their interests to create a balkanized melting pot so they can use divide and conquer tactics to enslave all races under a centralized new world order.
The elite want us to be at each others throats while they dominate over the downtrodden and befuddled warring tribes. Race is the ultimate touchstone hot button issue and the Globalists have enacted policies of rampant uncontrolled immigration in order to force hostile cultures to intermingle. The outcome is always tribal warfare, as we saw in Bosnia and Kosovo.
The right of newspapers to publish these caricatures is unwavering and freedom of speech takes precedence over everything else. Violent Muslim demonstrators should be aware that they are sowing the seeds of their own destruction by allowing the media to portray them as freedom hating, brutal and out of control. This ensures increased support for future wars that primarily target Muslim and Persian majority countries.
During collection of material that is posted on this website, we regularly scan political cartoon and artwork archives such as Daryl Cagle's Professional Cartoonists Index. This is an archive for cartoons that appear in US newspapers nationwide on a daily basis. On numerous occasions over the past five years we have seen cartoons and caricatures that depict Mohammed. Why the sudden outrage now?
As Kurt Nimmo points out, the three most offensive cartoons that caused the outrage were not even printed in the Danish Jyllands-Posten newspaper but were added in and handed out by Danish imams who ??circulated the images to brethren in Muslim countries,? according to the London Telegraph.
It also appears highly suspicious that Muslims in Gaza City and other places had gained access to a plentiful supply of Danish flags to burn in front of the waiting world media as soon as the controversy broke out.
We have tirelessly documented previous cases where Muslim clerics and leaders were proven to be acting on behalf of Western intelligence agencies. Early indications strongly suggest that the original riots that led to worldwide demonstrations were staged managed.
Last November's French riots were used to advance a similar agenda that we see unraveling today.
The melting pot of multiculturalism does not work, it has never worked and it was never intended to work. The Algerians in France do not want to be part of the Western fabric because they fundamentally hate it to its very core. This is not helped by promotion of decadent and hedonistic lifestyles pumped out from every cultural and media orifice.
A sizeable proportion of the secular humanist Westerners who like to think of themselves as part of the establishment, when in reality they are unwitting tools of the true elite, have bought into the cuddly utopian philosophy that the West is a global village which welcomes all comers and has the enlightened innate ability to homogenize millions of different people of all different colors and creeds into one giant melting pot.
The reality couldn't be further from the truth and images of flaming buses, schools, nurseries, terror and panic betrayed that fact in France last November.
Establishment controlled Mexican groups such as Aztlan and Mecha advocate killing all whites and blacks and driving them out of the southern states by means of brutal ethnic cleansing. Flags and placards carried at marches depict white people having their heads cut off, as seen in the picture below.
Those that protest such groups are then attacked by the establishment media and labeled as racists, despite the fact that the Plan of San Diego, a rallying cry for the Hispanic Klan groups, advocates total eradication of any race but Hispanics.
Mecha's own slogan reads, "For the race everything. For those outside the race, nothing."
Again, this racial warfare only benefits a smug elite who are content to sit back and watch all the chaos unfold, leaving a terrified middle class to beg for a choking police state to be instituted as the only solution to the problem, a problem manufactured by elite control of so-called minority groups in the first place.
Violent Muslim demonstrators need to take a step back and consider what is important in the long term. The ability of western media to exercise freedom of speech and print cartoons, or unwittingly greasing the skids for a giant engineered backlash against the Muslim world that will see all Muslim nations subjugated and dominated under a tyrannical world government, along with every other race, color and creed.
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
Getting a little desperate huh pissy? Your posts have gotten wierder and wierder every time i log on.
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
Cartoon editor Fleming Rose and the tentacles of PNAC
It turns out the editor who originally publshed the "offensive" Muslim cartoons is a disciple of Daniel Pipes and the "clash of civilizations" theory put out by Project for a New American Century. PNAC is the outfit that called for a "Pearl Harbor event' in order to initiate a global war against the Muslim world. American Free Press, Feb. 4:
"Under the guise of free speech, a leading Danish newspaper published a dozen provocative anti-Islamic cartoons clearly designed to offend Muslims. The predictable result has greatly increased the possibility of violence and left Denmark in a costly and dangerous predicament.
Four months after Jyllands-Posten (JP), Denmark's most widely read morning paper, published 12 anti-Islamic cartoons, Danes woke up to the fact that there is a very high price to be paid for promoting the "clash of civilizations."
The fact that the editors behind the anti-Islamic images claim to be exercising free speech while refusing to address Europe's strict censorship laws regarding discussion of the Holocaust and the ongoing imprisonment of historical revisionists reveals the existence of a more sinister agenda behind the provocative cartoons.
"Agents of certain persuasion" are behind the egregious affront to Islam in order to provoke Muslims, Professor Mikael Rothstein of the University of Copenhagen told the BBC. The key "agent" is Flemming Rose, the cultural editor of JP, who commissioned cartoonists to produce the blasphemous images and then published them in Denmark's leading morning paper last September.
The International Herald Tribune, which reported on the offensive cartoons on January 1, noted that even the liberalism of Rose had its limits when it came to criticism of Zionist leaders and their crimes. Rose also has clear ties to the Zionist Neo-Cons behind the "war on terror."
Rose told the international paper owned by The New York Times that "he would not publish a cartoon of Israel's Ariel Sharon strangling a Palestinian baby, since that could be construed as 'racist.'" [...]
Rose traveled to Philadelphia in October 2004 to visit Daniel Pipes, the Neo-Con ideologue who says the only path to Middle East peace will come through a total Israeli military victory. Rose then penned a positive article about Pipes, who compares "militant Islam" with fascism and communism.
In April 2003, President George W. Bush nominated the rabid anti-Muslim Pipes to the board of the United States Institute of Peace, a congressionally sponsored think tank
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
Oil giant Iran became the latest nation to impose penalties, saying on Monday it would cut off all trade ties with Denmark. Reuters reported that Iran imports $280 million worth of goods from Denmark a year.
* * *
Qatar's Chamber of Commerce said it had halted dealings with Danish and Norwegian delegations, while in Bahrain, parliament formed a committee to contact Arab and Islamic governments to enforce the boycott.
* * *
Iraq's transport ministry also said it was severing ties with the Danish and Norwegian governments, a move that includes terminating all contracts with companies based in those countries.
* * *
Danish-Swedish dairy company Arla Foods told Reuters it was losing $1.8 million of sales a day in the Middle East. Its products were removed from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait.
* * *
"Not a single sachet of a Danish product is left on our shelves," the director of a Kuwaiti supermarket told Reuters.
Meanwhile...
[N]on-Danish companies have rushed in to tell consumers about the origin of their products in a bid to keep them on supermarket shelves.
Switzerland's Nestle, Italy's Ferrero and New Zealand's dairy co-operative Fonterra were among the companies putting out newspaper ads showing their products were not made or imported from Denmark, according to Reuters.
I feel bad for Danish companies that did nothing to offend Muslims. But, if one Danish newspaper thinks nothing of insulting millions of Muslims so that they can express their contempt for a few, then how can Danish companies complain when millions of Muslims express their contempt for a few Danish companies by making them all suffer.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
There are many Danish people (one at this blog) who expressed regrets for recent events. And I don't suggest that any government intervene and prohibit or punish people for showing such poor judgment.
But, if Danish officials (and other prominent Danes) had acted swiftly to distance themselves morally from those kinds of base attacks against an entire faith, then innocent Danish companies most certainly would not find themselves in the position they're in today.
Shit, even CNN knows better.
CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons out of respect for Islam.
I hope this is all over soon. The concept of free speech was designed to advance civilization, not to obliterate it.
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspo...for-goose.html
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
Quote:
Originally Posted by eg420ne
Cartoon editor Fleming Rose and the tentacles of PNAC
It turns out the editor who originally publshed the "offensive" Muslim cartoons is a disciple of Daniel Pipes and the "clash of civilizations" theory put out by Project for a New American Century. PNAC is the outfit that called for a "Pearl Harbor event' in order to initiate a global war against the Muslim world. American Free Press, Feb. 4:
"Under the guise of free speech, a leading Danish newspaper published a dozen provocative anti-Islamic cartoons clearly designed to offend Muslims. The predictable result has greatly increased the possibility of violence and left Denmark in a costly and dangerous predicament.
Four months after Jyllands-Posten (JP), Denmark's most widely read morning paper, published 12 anti-Islamic cartoons, Danes woke up to the fact that there is a very high price to be paid for promoting the "clash of civilizations."
The fact that the editors behind the anti-Islamic images claim to be exercising free speech while refusing to address Europe's strict censorship laws regarding discussion of the Holocaust and the ongoing imprisonment of historical revisionists reveals the existence of a more sinister agenda behind the provocative cartoons.
"Agents of certain persuasion" are behind the egregious affront to Islam in order to provoke Muslims, Professor Mikael Rothstein of the University of Copenhagen told the BBC. The key "agent" is Flemming Rose, the cultural editor of JP, who commissioned cartoonists to produce the blasphemous images and then published them in Denmark's leading morning paper last September.
The International Herald Tribune, which reported on the offensive cartoons on January 1, noted that even the liberalism of Rose had its limits when it came to criticism of Zionist leaders and their crimes. Rose also has clear ties to the Zionist Neo-Cons behind the "war on terror."
Rose told the international paper owned by The New York Times that "he would not publish a cartoon of Israel's Ariel Sharon strangling a Palestinian baby, since that could be construed as 'racist.'" [...]
Rose traveled to Philadelphia in October 2004 to visit Daniel Pipes, the Neo-Con ideologue who says the only path to Middle East peace will come through a total Israeli military victory. Rose then penned a positive article about Pipes, who compares "militant Islam" with fascism and communism.
In April 2003, President George W. Bush nominated the rabid anti-Muslim Pipes to the board of the United States Institute of Peace, a congressionally sponsored think tank
this post just uses to many non-objective word...you know like "anti-muslim cartoons" come on, theres the way to put oil on a fire...this article is dumb-fucked
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
The people who started the cartoon are the Imams in Denmark. They started this in December and the Danish newspaper was trying to tell the story about what had happened. The Imams put out these cartoons to incite violence. And their own people fell for it hook-line-and-sinker.Oh well.
I wish riots would break out here,payback time.
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
this religion is the first to use the fear agent to govern there people...i don't have to much respect for the extremist of this religion...i know a guy working with me who is muslims and he thought the cartoons were actually funny...so no point in killing people or burning ambassy for that...they should calm down and respect others before asking for respect...
there was no dis-respect in making a cartoon about a prophet, it's simply the wolrd we live in today...
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
OOOOO im sorry:thumbsup: didnt mean 2 hurt any1s thought process, even tho most peoples thinking is turn off to this Neo-Con global empire agenda...
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
Quote:
Originally Posted by eg420ne
OOOOO im sorry:thumbsup: didnt mean 2 hurt any1s thought process, even tho most peoples thinking is turn off to this Neo-Con global empire agenda...
Sorry kiddo, but wether you choose to admit it or not, you are the minority in this world.:thumbsup: Do you even know what a neo-con is without looking it up real quick?:confused:
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
Quote:
Originally Posted by eg420ne
OOOOO im sorry:thumbsup: didnt mean 2 hurt any1s thought process, even tho most peoples thinking is turn off to this Neo-Con global empire agenda...
not even close to most by the way...
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
Quote:
Originally Posted by amsterdam
Sorry kiddo, but wether you choose to admit it or not, you are the minority in this world.:thumbsup: Do you even know what a neo-con is without looking it up real quick?:confused:
I did look it up kiddy, just to make sure i was right on what a Neo-Con is!, all I have to do is look at the Bush Administration and see what a neo-con is...
Neoconservatism refers to the political movement, ideology, and public policy goals of "new conservatives" in the United States, who are mainly characterized by their relatively interventionist and hawkish views on foreign policy, and their lack of support for the "small government" principles and restrictions on social spending, when compared with other American conservatives such as traditional or paleoconservatives.
In the context of U.S. foreign policy, neoconservative has another, narrower definition: one who advocates the use of military force, unilaterally if necessary, to replace autocratic regimes with democratic ones. This view competes with liberal internationalism, realism, and non-interventionism.
The prefix "neo" can denote that many of the movement's founders, originally liberals, Democrats or from socialist backgrounds, were new to conservatism, but can also refer to the comparatively recent emergence of this "new wave" of conservative thought, which coalesced in the early 1970s from a variety of intellectual roots in the decades following World War II. It also serves to distinguish the ideology from the viewpoints of "old" or traditional American conservatism.
Modern neoconservatism is associated with periodicals such as Commentary and The Weekly Standard and some of the foreign policy initiatives of think tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). Neoconservative journalists, pundits, policy analysts, and politicians, often dubbed "neocons" by supporters and critics alike, have been credited with (or blamed for) their influence on U.S. foreign policy, especially under the administrations of Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) and George W. Bush (2001-present), and are particularly noted for their association with and support for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. The term "neocon", while increasingly popular in recent years, is somewhat controversial and is rejected by many to whom the label is applied
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
I figured you would say that. Bush is far from a Neo-Con and as a matter of fact. real right-wingers hate W. Read a book sometime.
I do love your liberal definition of non-interventionism.LOL. You got that right. Sit around with your thumbs up your asses while people are slaughterd and genocide ravages Africa (Rawanda). Not to mention letting your own citizens be slaughtered by terrorists in 4 seperate attacks on our country, (1st world trade attack), in foreign countries,( Kenya AND Tanzania) and our military,(U.S.S. Cole). Thats why liberals have no power anymore and will never be trusted with national security again. Good Job Guys!!
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
Ya i forgot bush is just a fascist monkey and you all praise him saying, ol save me from the evil brown terrorist LordBushler.......
If this were a dictatorship it be heck of alot easier just so long as im the dictator-GWBushiter
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
And most of his administration are part of the PNAC plan which is very Neo-conservatived......
.Modern neoconservatism is associated with periodicals such as Commentary and The Weekly Standard and some of the foreign policy initiatives of think tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). Neoconservative journalists, pundits, policy analysts, and politicians, often dubbed "neocons" by supporters and critics alike, have been credited with (or blamed for) their influence on U.S. foreign policy, especially under the administrations of Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) and George W. Bush (2001-present), and are particularly noted for their association with and support for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. The term "neocon", while increasingly popular in recent years, is somewhat controversial and is rejected by many to whom the label is applied
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
It is chilling to read this statement from January 1998, for it makes exactly the argument, in regard to Iraq, that was pushed by Bush and his media supporters in 2003. It seems clear that Bush came into office in January 2001 with the intention stated in the letter.
THE CAST HE CHOSE??Among the 18 signers to this pro-Iraq-war letter were nine people who Bush promptly appointed to federal positions. A signer and a PNAC founder, Donald Rumsfeld, was named Bush's Secretary of Defense on December 11, 2000, before the inauguration. Vice President Cheney was also a PNAC founder.
Throughout the months leading up to September 11, 2001, Bush consistently chose PNAC networkers, focused on Iraq, over nonpartisan security experts for top security positions.
Bush announced the appointment of PNAC signer Robert B. Zoellick as the U.S. Trade Representativethe president's principal trade adviser??on January 11, 2001. Paul D. Wolfowitz was named Deputy Secretary of Defense on February 5. Richard L. Armitage was appointed Deputy Secretary of State on February 12. Dov S. Zakheim became Comptroller at the Defense Department on February 12. And John R. Bolton was picked as Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security Affairs at the State Department on February 21. PNAC people, all.
Dov Zakheim, the Pentagon Comptroller, is responsible for overseeing contracts for the reconstruction of Iraq. Zakheim recently defended Halliburton's handling of its Iraq contracts in testimony before a Congressional panel. His sympathetic testimony is posted on Halliburton's website, www.halliburton.com.
Within a month of assuming the presidency, Bush thus gave control of pertinent positions in the executive branch to hawks with the none-too-subtle agenda of invading Iraq. Former White House terrorism adviser Richard Clarke testified before the 9/11 Commission that the Bush II administration came into office wanting to pick up where the Bush I White House left off. Clarke was attacked at the 9/11 hearing by Commissioner John F. Lehman, also a PNAC signer.
In February 2001, the New Republic mentioned that "Vice President Dick Cheney has quietly been stocking the Defense Department with outspoken interventionists. . . . Cheney has effectively created his own foreign policy apparatus, installing his protégés (and, in the case of Donald Rumsfeld, his mentor) at the Defense Department and the White House." It noted that "many of Cheney's protégés are known for their willingness to use military force." The New York Times ran only a three-line note on Bush appointees who supported invading Iraq.
THEY KEPT COMING??By the end of May 2001, PNAC members also held sensitive positions in the State Department's global affairs division and the Pentagon's Office of International Security Policy. PNAC signatory Peter W. Rodman was appointed to the International Security Affairs office in the Defense Department. Rodman, an assistant to Henry Kissinger in the Nixon and Ford administrations, worked in the State Department and the National Security Council (NSC) in the Reagan and first Bush administrations, and was more recently the director of National Security Programs at the Nixon Center, a conservative think tank.
The National Security Council was similarly politicized. Bush appointed the PNAC signer Dr. Zalmay Khalilzad to the National Security Council on May 23, and signer Elliott Abrams to the NSC on June 25. Khalilzad worked at the Pentagon under former President Bush and went to the Rand Corporation, a major military contractor, in the 1990s. Born in Afghanistan, he was also a consultant to U.S. oil company Unocal, which attempted for several years to launch a giant pipeline deal with the Taliban in Afghanistan. Khalilzad is now the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan. Abrams is the NSC representative for Middle Eastern Affairs.
Other signers of Project for the New American Century's letters and statements have been appointed to federal positions. Thus a tax-exempt organization connected to previous G.O.P. administrations, to military contractors and to foreign countries has continued a 10-year project to get the U.S. into war with Iraq.
http://www.washingtonspectator.com/a...warriors_2.cfm