Canada Legalizes "Sex Clubs" - "14-year-olds will be exploited"

[align=left]Canada Legalizes "Sex Clubs" - "14-year-olds will be exploited"
[/align]
[align=left]Life Site/Gudrun Schultz | December 22 2005
[/align]
[align=left]The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that group sex in publicly accessible venues is legal.
[/align]
In a ruling handed down this morning, Canada's Supreme Court has declared it is legal for clubs to provide opportunities for group sex. As long as consent is given, the area is somewhat private, and no payment is directly involved, partner exchanging or "swinging" and group participation in sexual acts is not considered illegal.

"The decision is certainly in line with the tendency of this court to throw out any restrictions to behavior," said Gwen Landolt, vice president of Real Women of Canada. "The courts are gradually reducing public concern about morality and behavior that is offensive. Judges don't have legitimacy."

"There is a real trend to break down moral principles in Canadian society. Those principles have been built based on human experience about what is in the best interest of society."

With sex clubs now protected by Canada's supreme court, the potential social repercussions are staggering. The age of sexual consent in Canada is 14. Canadian teenagers can now legally participate in group sex offered by clubs (so long as alcohol is not sold on the premises).

"The implications are horrendous," said Landolt. "It's an exploitation of human sexuality. 14-year-olds will be exploited."

The Supreme Court ruling addressed two Quebec Court of Appeal decisions that had arrived at opposite conclusions. The owners of two Montreal 'swingers' clubs were charged with operating bawdy houses, in both cases involving group sex. One was convicted, the other acquitted. The owner who was convicted appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court. The Crown appealed the acquittal of the other owner.

The Supreme Court's decision was based upon the definition of what constitutes a public place and an 'indecent act'. (Prostitution was not a factor in either case, even though payment was required at both locations before entry.)

One club was for members only, and the sexual activity took place in designated rooms, sometimes with on-lookers. The other club, which had a cursory doorman in place, used a moveable, transparent curtain to block off the dance floor at regular intervals, and the activity took place behind the curtain. In both clubs, according to the owners, entry was granted to adult patrons after a fee was paid and the person was notified about the nature of the club.

In general, case law has defined an indecent act as that behavior which either offends the community or has the potential to cause harm to the community in some way.

According to Supreme Court Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin, group sex neither offends nor harms the Canadian public.

Supreme Court Justices Major, Binnie, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron agreed with McLachlin's ruling. Justice Michel Bastarache and Justice Louis LeBel disagreed.

wow. I never would of expected them to allow such young teenagers into these brothels!
Still, it's a matter of personal choice. If youre a slut at 14 youre going to get shagged like crazy any way. At least it's regulated.
Not letting them have alcoholic drinks though..thats kinda funny. Dontcha think?[align=right]

Making prostitution legal will allow the act to be managed instead of ignored. Pimps and organized crime figures, who regularly treat their workers on subhuman levels, would no longer control women. In some countries, prostitute rings buy and sell women on the black market, force their women to comply through violence and create unhealthy working conditions. When prostitutes operate independently and in secret, many times they become abused by their own customers.

:pimp:

It is estimated that 100,000 to 3 million teens are nearly invisibly prostituted per year in the United States (Walker, 2002). If we allow prostitution to remain hidden from view and basically invisible to the law as it is today, we allow a number of teens to be swept up into prostitution every year. When adult women decide to exchange money for sex, it is a personal choice open to them under the philosophy of a free, democratic society. When troubled minors who do not yet have the social survival skills decide to prostitute, they are often manipulated by opportunists who exploit these teens, typically leading to horrific ends. Legalizing prostitution will help prevent these instances through regulation. [/align]

interesting...


now wait a second guys. noones going to let 14 year olds in sex clubs. we still have liquor requirements. and dont worry...there will be 18/19 and over age restrictions.

that article is just a simple knee-jerk reaction to losing the arguement.


very interesting...

Sex clubs may sound good in theory, but probably they in up with 20 guys for every girl.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by andruejaysin

Sex clubs may sound good in theory, but probably they in up with 20 guys for every girl.

---

Most these type clubs don't accept single males...check out Club Hedonism. :thumbsup:

I'm sure I could find a fat girl who would saY she loved me (and probably mean it), but the basic problem remains...

uh Swinger Clubs Welcome Single Males, there are lots and lots of them in Florida, Atlanta. Anyone and Everyone is welcome to a Swinger Club.

And anyone else got this feeling that NAMBLA is gona be having week long fieldtrips to Canada now?

I take it you didn't check out Club Hedonism.

That's in Jamaica, right? Further than I'm willing to travel just to get laid. I would like to check out their weed, though.

You're WAY off. The only thing that was legalized was places where people can swap partners, or watch their partners have sex with others. It basically legalized swinging.

so where does it say 14 yr olds can do it too?

Tuesday, December 27, 2005


This may be what they were talking about, I dont know- found it interesting
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canada new destination
of choice for pedophiles?
High court ruling legalized
group-sex clubs with 14-year-olds

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: December 27, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern



by James L. Lambert



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com




The Canadian Supreme Court ruling that redefined obscenity for that nation and legalized group-sex clubs, combined with Canada's unusually low age of consent â?? 14 â?? will result in an influx of pedophiles to America's neighbor to the north, contends a former consultant to the U.S. Justice Department.

In its Dec. 20 decision, Canada's Supreme Court legalized a type of business activity previously restricted by Canadian law, overturning two previous Quebec Court of Appeal decisions that had ruled group-sex clubs qualified as "bawdy houses" violating Quebec's community decency standards and were therefore illegal.


Judith Reisman, a world-renowned scholar and author of four books, including "Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences," said that since under Canadian law 14-year-olds are legally considered "consenting adults," the court's controversial decision "will now make Canada a sex traffic playground for pedophiles."

A former consultant to three U.S. administrations, Reisman, who is also a WND columnist, says the court's decision sends a clear message to pedophiles: "You don't have to go to Asia anymore. Pedophiles can have the blond, blue-eyed kids in Canada, too."

The Canadian government, Reisman believes, is sending a strong message to international sex traders that "you can get all the kids you want when you come to Canada." The liberalization of the Canadian courts, the author contends, shows "that pedophiles or politicians who refuse to prosecute these types of crimes are in power more than ever in Canada."


Supreme Court Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin was joined by Justices Major, Binnie, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron in the sex-club decision. Dissenting justices Michael Bastarache and Louis LeBel said the high court's ruling "strips of all relevance the social values that the Canadian community as a whole believes should be protected," according to Canada's Globe and Mail newspaper.

"There is a real trend to break down moral principles in Canadian society," said Gwen Landolt, vice president of Real Women of Canada, according to LifeSiteNews.com. "The implications are horrendous," said Landolt. "It's an exploitation of human sexuality. Fourteen-year-olds will be exploited."

"The Canadian government," Reisman told WND, "will see that the kids are clean from sexual disease by giving them the appropriate drugs and medication and if they get pregnant, they will provide them with abortions."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ahh ok thanks ;)

very intresting but how many woman regret what they done when they were 14 its also a bit sick but that is only my opinion