Printable View
just spill it, give me the rules and confinements with which i am required to conform in order to convey my understanding of the impossible to your binding perception.
what laws must i adhere to make you understand that these laws are illogical?
pardon any and all mistakes i make in asking you, just please give it to me straight.
I already have in every other post directed towards you , just listen to the standard rules of debate for the english language its easily googled .Considering ive plainly stated what I would like from you. Take it from any other post I just want clarity and consistency from anyone (as does any debate participant)
how am i inconsistant? am i not constantly telling you the same thing?
where am i not clear? how can i be clearer? you're no help, you have no reason to complain about how you cant understand what im trying to convey to you, if you arent even going to try to help me understand what it is you dont udnerstand.
this thread is shot -_-
oh, back from my results: easy to google MY ASS
FUCK google, the only time i can find results i am looking for is when i am looking for porn!
SSW if you refuse to reread the posts which ive done before clearly pointing out fallacies (sorry not bold preface with underline .....I'm sorry I wasnt aware I have to hit you with a stick to get you to realize exactly what im talkin about) if you wish to ignore them fine. Continue to do so , please stop claiming i've made vague claims to yours and that you dont understand where your inconsistencies lie (when I clearly said its because you dont apply the same rules you apply to others to yourself.....look at my posts READ the whole thing....ok seriously your going off half cocked. If need be get a friend to look it over and read it with you slowly if you cant see it....)
Basically all your doing is showing yourself as either a liar right now , or someone who doesnt even read more than a few lines of any posts directed at him. OK. Seriously is english a second language? because if not I'd expect anyone over the grade of 8 to be able to distinguish proper english from fanciful meaning. IF not my apologies. Otherwise reread my posts and stop repeating yourself ad nauseum with the same tired complaints that ignore everything i've pointed out ok.....?
Come on you can't find anything through google other than porn....I hope that is a HUGE exaggeration.....
Oh and where's my hash I saw hash in the title dammit!
god damnit man, hit me with a fucking god damned tree right now!!! >=(
i cnanot read what you read as wrong.
i have read my posts and understand them fully, i have read your posts and re read your posts and re reread your posts and STILL i fail to understand what you are griping about!!! :(
pull out the fucking tree and lay the beat down or shut the FUCK up, unfortunately i am a little pissed off right now, and cannot understand why YOU make me so mad! i am angry with myself for becoming so angered by your failure to comprehend my posts.
if i understood what your problem was, maybe i wouldnt be so pissed off at you for having a problem.
Sigh I've explained it as many times as I will , It was clear concise and to the point. I refuse to hit you with a tree. If you want to be obstinate feel free.....I give up, theres no making it any simpler than I have, to me anyway. Maybe someone else can make it even simpler I dont know how. Once perhaps you've read the SD for awhile you'll finally understand my frustration. (Proper language is needed to communicate an idea....no made up words and definitions or else theres really no discussion ya see....thats about as simple as it gets for me).
you're a piece of shit, i cant stand people who have the AUDACITY to complain about another's faults, yet refuse to help them understand both why what they do is a fault, and WHAT the faulty action is in the first place!
EXPLAIN TO ME, DAMNIT, WHY I AM WRONG.
you have no reason to claim i am wrong if you cannot explain it.
-_- sorry weirdo, i know (or at least hope :D) you mean well, but you are not doing a good job at having a point; you can point out that i am wrong by some means, but you cannot provide me with the means for which i am wrong, and if you could, i would most appreciate that, otherwise, shut your trap, you do not have a basis to attack me. forgive the rudeness, im in a bad mood, sorry
I think what he is saying is he needs you to back it up with more then just your ideas. You need reasons for your beliefs. I take it that weirdo is a logical person. Looking for the parts that make sence and the "have to be" answer.
"it" is too much to be backed up in a thread really lol
"it" is the lack of disproval and impossible.
science proves things by disproving elswise.
religion proves things with blind faith and verbal (often physical) attacks on "defilers".
i say that nothing can truly be disproven, and given the proper circumstances "disproof" will look retarded and abismal.
such as, i can prove the world is flat.
pretty retarded and abismal in today's eyes, isnt it?
i've never learned how to argue about something under a confinement of rules, my who belief is based on laws and rules either do not truly exist or can be easily broken with concentration.
not as things are now, though, too many negative minds to contend with, 6 billion minds say "impossible" reducing the ability of the other 5 million minds to break past that impossibility.
another 500 thousand are trying to excersize their minds to believe "possible".
so we have some 6 billion equal defining forces of reality that say it is impossible and only 500 thousand that say otherwise.
the mob rule wins by default, because thought isnt like a bank account, you cannot hoard the power and unleash it in one moment, it is constantly flowing from you.
every time you doubt you can break the laws of physics, you make it more solid and real, that physical laws cannot be broken, your thoughts are a weak form of zero point energy, the more you observe a thought, the more real it becomes, so why observe the thought that human flight is impossibe?
no, it cant be proven that thoughts create reality, no studies are avaialable to study such a thing, let alon ethe required funding.
we would first be required to develope science that can both prove and observe the string theory.
and even then, we could be lightyears away from physical thoughtology!
first you need a thought, then you need great quantities of concentration, or group observation of one thought, and when enough mental effort is finally inserted into one thought...
it gains a point of realism, perhaps the first point is the string theory, perhaps the first point is smaller by far! but in any case, thoughts with enough observation become real in some manner, it is largely automated by what we think; the collective of all thoughts determines reality.
if you could percieve the collective of all thoughts, you'll probably find humans to be very negative minded, and all other beings will appear "ignorant" in their ignoring all negative aspects of life, how a zeebra ignores the pain of death, in light of the survival of it's prediter, the lion. unlike humans, i believe all other animals are inherently born with a psychic connection to the mind, however i also believe that the animals also suffer the same level of ignorance as humans, just in a different fassion, a more harmonic fassion at that.
how many times did i go off topic this time? -_-