Bush Takes Responsibility for Blunders

Bush Takes Responsibility for Blunders
AP, September 13, 2005
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050913/..._washington_14

WASHINGTON - President Bush said Tuesday that "I take responsibility" for failures in dealing with Hurricane Katrina and said the disaster raised broader questions about the government's ability to respond to natural disasters as well as terror attacks.

"Katrina exposed serious problems in our response capability at all levels of government," Bush said at joint White House news conference with the president of Iraq.

"To the extent the federal government didn't fully do its job right, I take responsibility," Bush said.

The president was asked whether people should be worried about the government's ability to handle another terrorist attack given failures in responding to Katrina.

"Are we capable of dealing with a severe attack? That's a very important question and it's in the national interest that we find out what went on so we can better respond," Bush replied.

He said he wanted to know both what went wrong and what went right.

As for blunders in the federal response, "I'm not going to defend the process going in," Bush said. "I am going to defend the people saving lives."

He praised relief workers at all levels. "I want people in America to understand how hard people worked to save lives down there," he said.

Bush spoke after R. David Paulison, the new acting director of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, pledged to intensify efforts to find more permanent housing for the tens of thousands of Hurricane Katrina survivors now in shelters.

It was the closest Bush has come to publicly finding fault with any federal officials involved in the hurricane response, which has been widely criticized as disjointed and slow. Some federal officials have sought to fault state and local officials for being unprepared to cope with the disaster.

Bush planned to address the nation Thursday evening from Louisiana, where he will be monitoring recovery efforts, the White House announced earlier Tuesday.

Paulison, in his first public comments since taking the job on Monday, told reporters: "We're going to get those people out of the shelters, and we're going to move and get them the help they need."

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff introduced Paulison as the Bush administration tried to deflect criticism for the sluggish initial federal response to the hurricane and its disastrous aftermath.

Chertoff said that while cleanup, relief and reconstruction from Katrina is now the government's top priority, the administration would not let down its guard on other potential dangers.

"The world is not going to stop moving because we are very focused on Katrina," Chertoff said.

Paulison, named to the post on Monday, said he was busy "getting brought up to speed."

He replaced Michael Brown, who resigned on Monday, three days after being removed from being the top onsite federal official in charge of the government's response.

Paulison said Bush called him Monday night and "thanked me for coming on board."

Bush promised that he would have "the full support of the federal government," Paulison said.

Chertoff said the relief operation had entered a new phase.

Initially, he said, the most important priority was evacuating people, getting them to safety, providing food, water and medical care.

" And then ultimately at the end of the day, we have to reconstitute the communities that have been devastated," Chertoff added.

He said the federal government would look increasingly to state and local officials for guidance on rebuilding the devastated communities along the Gulf Coast.

"The federal government can't drive permanent solutions down the throats of state and local officials," Chertoff said. "I don't think anyone should envision a situation in which they're going to take a back seat. They're going to take a front seat," he said.

Chertoff said that teams of federal auditors were being dispatched to the stricken areas to make sure that billions of dollars worth of government contracts were being properly spent. "We want to get aid to people who need it quickly, but we also don't want to lose sight of the importance of preserving the integrity of the process and our responsibility as stewards of the public money," Chertoff said.

"We're going to cut through red tape," he said, "but we're not going to cut through laws and rules that govern ethics."

Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said that some military aircraft and other equipment may be able to move out of the Gulf Coast soon.

"We've got to the point where most if not all of the search and rescue is completed," said Rumsfeld, who is attending a NATO meeting in Berlin. "Some helicopters can undoubtedly be moved out over the period ahead."

He also said there is a very large surplus of hospital beds in the region, so those could also be decreased. The USS Comfort hospital ship arrived near the Mississippi coast late last week. Rumsfeld added that nothing will be moved out of the area without the authorization of the two states' governors, the military leaders there and the president.

Elsewhere, workers with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention aren't finding many sick people, even though the specter of diseases has alarmed relief and rescue figures. Instead, between 40 and 50 percent of patients seeking emergency care have injuries. The CDC has counted 148 injuries in just the last two days, Carol Rubin, an agency hurricane relief specialist, said by telephone from the government's new public health headquarters in New Orleans' Kindred Hospital.

While she couldn't provide a breakdown, Rubin said chain saw injuries and carbon monoxide exposure from generators are among them. Those are particularly worrisome because they're likely to become more common as additional hurricane survivors re-enter the city in coming days, she said.

The message: Those injuries are preventable, if people take proper precautions, Rubin stressed.
____________________

I'm scared now.

Really.

Bush has taken responsiblity for something bad...finally. And even if it's just for political gain, it's the first time he's ever done that. So that scares me.

Is the world coming to an end or something? Are there changing weather patterns in hell?

what a revelation this was!!

did you watch the news conference held with the new elected president of Iraq or just cut and paste this material?

"...newly elected president..."

And of course I cut and pasted this. I'm not an AP writer.

It is possible to get your news without watching TV, man. Are you really so fucked up as to come out on the attack even when someone's giving your guy a little credit?

no attack i swear.sorry for the confusion.

It's cool.

I just can't believe W. is taking credit for something bad. It scares me.

hahahaha.you might not like his policies or ideas.but in reality,he isnt a bad man.

a visionary,like the newly elected president of Iraq said at the news conference.

I know that my governor declared a state-of-emergency, for T.S. Ophelia, earlier this morning, when the winds in Virginia Beach were at an astonishing 13 MPH. During Isabel, a lot of people went hours inland and a lot stayed. But, I'm not gonna compare the two. All I'm saying is that Katrina was ringing New Orleans' doorbell when the mayor ordered mandatory vacuations.

The government warned the state more than 24 hours in advance of the mandatory evacuation. (I don't know if that's all straight because it was a long time ago when Hurricane Katrina struck. Three hundred, three hundred twenty-five , three hundred and fifty (I don't know, it was so long ago) hours ago).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amsterdam

hahahaha.you might not like his policies or ideas.but in reality,he isnt a bad man.

a visionary,like the newly elected president of Iraq said at the news conference.

---

He's a visionary all right. I don't know what the fuck he's smoking that's making him visualize the things he does though.

But I don't think he's a bad man. I don't know him personally to know one way or the other. All I see is that he's a corporate crony - come on, even Republicans can't argue that - and his policies are severely one-sided in their benefits.

every president's policies are one sided...they always favor bigger government and the military/media/corporate industrial complex...

thats what happens when 62 million people vote you into power,you implement your agenda.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amsterdam

thats what happens when 62 million people vote you into power,you implement your agenda.

---

or your father's old agenda

Or whatever agenda best serves the wishes of the oil industry, your pocketbook and your various corporate sponsors. (Is it any coincidence that Halliburton is the one profiting most from this war? You'd have to be pretty naïve to say that it is.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amsterdam

thats what happens when 62 million people vote you into power,you implement your agenda.

---

But what if 62 million people don't vote for you? What if, in fact, most people vote against you?

Didn't stop W. in 2001, when he pushed through most of his agenda.

very manly of him.

Also remember, Hitler also enacted his agenda after a majority of the German people democratically elected him into power. Just because the masses have been deceived into believing something is a good idea, certainly does not make it a good idea.

I guess Karl Rove figured there was no way spin this as anything but a major fuck up.

well,in 3 years we can all do battle again,i really cant wait.

i really dont see any dems who even stand a chance.

and yes,around 62 million people voted for W.i know it hurt to get spanked so severly,but get on with your life.you lost,,,,,,,BIG.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amsterdam

well,in 3 years we can all do battle again,i really cant wait.

i really dont see any dems who even stand a chance.

and yes,around 62 million people voted for W.i know it hurt to get spanked so severly,but get on with your life.you lost,,,,,,,BIG.

---

Imagine that; more "we won, you lost" bullshit from Amsterdam. Shocker.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amsterdam

well,in 3 years we can all do battle again,i really cant wait.

i really dont see any dems who even stand a chance.

and yes,around 62 million people voted for W.i know it hurt to get spanked so severly,but get on with your life.you lost,,,,,,,BIG.

---

Yes 62 million voted this moron in with the help of computer voting machines go usa, or maybe 62 million Ignorant people. Sounds reasonable

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eg420ne

...or maybe 62 million Ignorant people. Sounds reasonable

---

Actually, you aren't that far off. I read a poll recently - if I could find it again, I would reference it - where something like 40% of those who voted for W. thought his stance on the issues were the opposite of what they really are.

You cant make up stuff like this: See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over & over & over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda 4-24-05 G. BUSH
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our people, and neither do we 8-5-04 gwb
Theres an old saying in Tennessee-I know its in Texas, probably in Tennessee that says, fool me once, shame on- shame on you, fool me- you cant get fooled again..

or this one.... You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on...GWB 3-31-01

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amsterdam

well,in 3 years we can all do battle again,i really cant wait.

i really dont see any dems who even stand a chance.

and yes,around 62 million people voted for W.i know it hurt to get spanked so severly,but get on with your life.you lost,,,,,,,BIG.

---

And you lost, because you must live in the world you have chosen. Cool avatar, a shame you completely miss the point of the movie.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by andruejaysin

And you lost, because you must live in the world you have chosen. Cool avatar, a shame you completely miss the point of the movie.

---

I know, lot's of nudity and violence, but maybe if you explain your situation, your parents would let you watch it.