Wow, and you thought other people's theories were nuts....

False-flag terror attacks planned in US for August 13?

WHAT IF

the events of 9/11 were planned by operatives high in the US Government and military in order to propel the US into war in the Middle East, following a plan outlined years previously by the Project for a New American Century - whose members happen to be high in government?

WHAT IF

shortly before 9/11, rumors had run wild on the internet that the US Government was planning staged terrorist attacks in the US on 9/11?

WHAT IF

these rumors were so widespread that they even began making the evening news?

WHAT IF

literally millions of Americans were exposed to the idea - IN ADVANCE - that something terrible might be planned by their own government - for 9/11?

IF

the planners of 9/11 were inside the US Government, COULD THEY THEN HAVE PULLED IT OFF?

As you read the following, I urge you to ACT, whether you consider yourself political or not. You do not have to be 'political' to die in a staged terror attack or in a war.

1. Spread this rumor as far and wide as possible. Send it to everyone in your email address book, post a bulletin to your friends list in MySpace and elsewhere. Put it in every online group and forum you can.
2. Send it to every news outlet you can - "August 13 terror attack rumor sweeping internet"
3. E-mail your elected representatives (who do not represent you, but that's another discussion) - use the heading "Terror atacks planned for August 13?" or something similar and ask if there is any truth to this rumor. Short and sweet. They don't read their email, but if they get 5,000 of these, it will be a matter of record and someone will pay attention.

If two million people in this country are aware that there MAY be a plan for something to happen on August 13, and then something DOES happen...think about it.

If something DOESN'T happen...think about that, too.

THE OBJECT OF THIS STAGED TERROR ATTACK WOULD BE IMPOSITION OF MARTIAL LAW, AN IMMEDIATE WAR ON THE IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFIED 'CULPRIT' --AND A DRAFT THAT WOULD EFFECT - AT LEAST - EVERYONE FROM AGE 18 TO 24.

IF YOU ARE 16, DO NOT EXPECT A DRAFT TO GO AWAY BEFORE YOU'RE 18. PASS THIS ON!

ALREADY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WHORES ARE PAVING THE WAY FOR AN ATTACK ON IRAN, AND TRUMPETING FEAR OF A NEW 'AL QAEDA' ATTACK -- SEE IT FOR YOURSELF ON TONIGHT'S OR TOMORROW'S 'NEWS.'

ACT, FAST AND NOW, TO SPREAD THIS RUMOR. LET ANYONE RIDICULE YOU FOR THIS, BUT IF THIS RUMOR IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD, AND IF PLANS ARE IN PLACE, THEY MAY JUST HAVE TO BE CHANGED.


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Thought Criminal
Date: Aug 4, 2005 2:46 PM

Please read and repost this. Even if you don't believe it, or don't care, perhaps someone you pass this on to will. How would you feel if you could prepare someone or save their lives, but chose not to?

I'll reiterate for those who haven't known me long enough... I've been waiting for a particular event for years. This urgent feeling of impending catastrophe is always in the back of my mind... and every day that passes, the more it grates on my nerves. This summer, August and September, feel to me utterly frightening.

The following is from someone I trust, and I would do not take his warning lightly.

In eternal vigilance,
Thought Criminal

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: NodulonMax
Date: Aug 4, 2005 8:53 AM

To all of my friends,

So a few of you I have discussed this feeling I've had about this summer, what will happen. Well, I believe it is very close, very close indeed! I had a eerie dream 2 nights ago and this dream has been confirming many of my suspicitions abou this month, August. Too many things have been coming to me as warning signs about the next 10 days I just must share it with all of you.

As you know myspace is now going to be heavily regulated as the eye of big brother peers closely into our lives. I'm already seeing bullshit pop-ups when I go to my profile. I've been to many profiles, some I have spoke with, some i have nothing in common, some I have much in common. But what we all have in common, as you type of humans, ones that think outside of the box, is the knowing, not suspecting, but KNOWING that an evil force has hijacked our goverments and is going to influence our own lives more heavily through regulation. We see the game they play, they play with our minds and our souls. And so far only pawns have been moved, but the game is about to enter a whole new level.

As someone who is "sensitive" to the world I can feel large impacts upon society and the human psyche as a collcetive consciousness. I had this same feeling days before 7-7-05, 3-11-03, 12-26-04 and 9-11-01. Only this time the feeling is much more intense. So intense that I must say what I am now.

The morning after my dream, I had recieved an email from one of my good friends that I trust. It was a warning. The following came from my friend S____, who is with her husband H____ in South Alabama working for FEMA's Hurricane Dennis relief. By the way, S____ has seen auras in people since she was little. You can't lie to her.

"I met a FEMA official the other day, not a contractor like H____, but a Government FEMA official from The Dept of Homeland Security, he was escorted or seemed more like guarded by a special ops military guy dressed in full battle dress fatigues with weapon. He said that H____ should look to be very busy beginning on the 13th of August for a very long time. Not sure what he knew that we do not and why the specicfic date of the 13th. He would not say what kind of disaster or how he knew this only that it was about to get really busy for The Federal Emergency Management Agency. He was a very very "Red" guy with only one other color in his aura - orange - very dark but vibrant orange - manipulative, secrative and untrusting, His body guard goon was also very "Red" with a hint of grey/black - not good combos for much else other than special ops!! I believe what he told me was true and should be deemed reliable based on the patterns of his aura while we were speaking - he was telling me what he believes to be the truth, however it was truth coming from a person who generally I would not trust based on his aura colors,patterns and textures as well as his body language - stiff, arms folded, shifty eyes and he got way to close to my personal bubble space!! Just wanted to pass this along to the group. It feels important and quite disturbing. "

My jaw dropped when I read this. It confirmed all my suspictions about this month.

If you know your history, you'll know that 60 years ago, on August the 13th, 1945 America dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima to end the second world war. I am hearing there is much chatter on the internet that Al Queda (or whoever) is going to detonate a nuclear device on that day, August the 13th. It will probably be more than one city too. To begin the third world war? One of them is going to be a port city, that was part of my dream.

If this happens, there is no doubt in my mind that the U.S. goverment will re-enstate the draft and a war with Iran will begin. Possibly involving large-scale nuclear weapons.

I don't want to be an alarmist of any kind everyone, I just want you all to be aware, be listening to your heart. Your intuition will let you know if it is your time or not. The human race needs as much of you free-thinkers to survive as possible! These ruling forces of evil are trying thier best to take our minds and free will away from us. Remember, to them, we are property. We have a number when we leave the hospital after birth. We are marked! But we also can rebel, this is the universe of free will and I know you all will exercise this as they try to imprison us. They won't take me without a fight damnit, I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees anyday.

If you live in a big city, meditate on this probable situation. If you get a deep feeling to get out, then DO IT! Nothing matters other than your survival. You can always come to my house and crash if you have no place better to go! Then we shall fight them as a team. All over this great nation. The people that made America what it was will wake up as soon as the goverment (of whoever) tightens thier grip. Inform them, keep them from going crazy, stay calm and think. I wish you all the best, and I hope you will join me and pray that this situation does not manifest. Stay strong.

Eternal Love & Light to you all

Andy ________
Cullman, AL

Here is the code for a link to this page;

<a href="http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=20391859&b logID=40015832" target=blank>Phony terror attacks in US planned for August 13</a>

4:56 PM - 10 Comments - 2 Kudos - Add Comment

a fema official admitted on cbs that they were in NYC on monday night, ready to go into action the next day...giuliani said this at the 9/11 commission too...to say the feds at least had no foreknowledge of 9/11 is a joke...just like the drills being done of planes hitting buildings at the same time...oops.

there's always a drill...that's how they get honest people to carry out their dirty work.

people on the streets of NYC knew something was coming...many were warned. not a theory. many schools and businesses were closed.

the theory is that the magic passport flew through an exploded plane, through fire and landed perfectly on the ground unscathed, and that was evidence...and that 19 freedom hating muslims just up and did this one day and evaded any air defense.

we're under similar circumstances compared to 9/11...and lord bush is on a cozy vacation too at his crawford bunker/tv soundstage...with plans to invade more countries (per pnac) on the table.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XTC

If you know your history, you'll know that 60 years ago, on August the 13th, 1945 America dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima to end the second world war.

---

The atomic bomb named "Little Boy" was dropped on Hiroshima by the Enola Gay, a Boeing B-29 bomber, at 8:15 in the morning of August 6, 1945.
http://www.lclark.edu/~history/HIROSHIMA/

At 11:02 a.m. on Ausust 9, 1945, the explosion of an atomic bomb devastated Nagasaki.
http://www1.city.nagasaki.nagasaki.j...museume01.html

I was pretty sure I went to a different history class than you. UNLESS? If we take the 9th add it to the 6th and subtract two for the number of cities and OH MY GOD!!!! We got the 13th!!!!!
Thats erie!!! :eek:


P.S. They offered to surrender on the 10th and accepted terms on the 14th......but what can that mean???? :confused:

Hey Psycho I am curious have you ever read the Northwoods plan?

What are your thoughts on it?

http://www.gwu.edu/%7Ensarchiv/news/...northwoods.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwood

You know the PNAC is real....it is scary enough without adding all this conspiracy crap..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlueCat

Hey Psycho I am curious have you ever read the Northwoods plan?

What are your thoughts on it?

http://www.gwu.edu/%7Ensarchiv/news/...northwoods.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwood

---

It was the times. We just got over McCarthyism but the "red threat" was still there. A small country on our border with tight ties to the Kremlin. U.S. Generals were all about breaking out the nukes and going for it! Kennedy used great restraint by keeping our hard liners in check while at the same time having to deal with Khrushchev. I'm sure his talks with Khrushchev to remove the missles from Cuba also included thoughts of what would happen incase of one of their unfortunate deaths while tensions were so great. And another bargain met! Khrushchev pulled the missles but what did we give in order to achieve this?

Some say it relates to Kennedys assassination. Who knows. The Kennedys had the Russians, Cubans, upper U.S. generals, the Teamsters, and the mob all pissed off! One of the five; maybe a combination of the five? Who knows what the truth is. Maybe it WAS just some nut job.

There's alot of dirty shit that goes on behind closed doors. Lawyers, Politicians, and Generals oh my!!! :eek:

ok but do you see a problem with the government having a plan to fake an attack?

So we write this one off as history, a long time ago...forget it

How about the PNAC That one's fresh...what are you thoughts on it?

Oh I'm sure its a bunch of dirty lil' minds thinking up new and improved ways of dealing with situations. Do I believe they are behind Afghanistan...no. Maybe Iraq.....possibly? I still do believe that Saddam was hiding WMDs but were moved before the invasion. Why wouldn't he cooperate with inspectors? What is with these HUGE bunkers we have found if they weren't being used for nothing?
They can have their motives and I'll keep to mine. Fact is alot of good Kurds and Shi'ites were being exterminated. Something had to be done (Pisshead even thinks that!). We overlook Rwanda, Sudan, etc. full knowing of large scale killings but do nothing. For whatever reason they want to use, something had to be done!
At this point I think the PNAC is more concerned with keeping "democracy" in S. Korea and Tiawan than any other issue.

We overlook Rwanda, Sudan, etc. full knowing of large scale killings but do nothing

So with that said..... why do you think "we chose" Iraq over ALL THE OTHER possibilites? There were countries that pose a much greater security threat as well as countires with greater humanitarian needs. Why Iraq?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlueCat

We overlook Rwanda, Sudan, etc. full knowing of large scale killings but do nothing

So with that said..... why do you think "we chose" Iraq over ALL THE OTHER possibilites? There were countries that pose a much greater security threat as well as countires with greater humanitarian needs. Why Iraq?

---

Because the US have nothing to gain by freeing poor Africans who possess no resources whatsoever. Just like in Cambodia. Spread freedom my ass.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlueCat

We overlook Rwanda, Sudan, etc. full knowing of large scale killings but do nothing

So with that said..... why do you think "we chose" Iraq over ALL THE OTHER possibilites? There were countries that pose a much greater security threat as well as countires with greater humanitarian needs. Why Iraq?

---

Greater humanitarian needs....maybe equal to. There was genocide happening in Iraq too and we did stomp on countries toes that didn't really give a rats ass due to self interests. I'm sure the assassination attempt on paw had something to do with it also.

Like I've said, there's alot of shit that we aren't privy about. Who REALLY knows why? We opened the doors with an open election process that basically puts the Shi'ites into power with a 60% majority. Iran is a Shi'ite run government. Could end up being a big slap in the kisser but once again, who knows?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by F L E S H

Because the US have nothing to gain by freeing poor Africans who possess no resources whatsoever. Just like in Cambodia. Spread freedom my ass.

---

Sudan has no resources? Get real dude! The French already have their oil deals arranged in that country! :rolleyes:





'World's worst humanitarian crisis'
"In Darfur, it would be better to help the Sudanese get over the crisis so their country is pacified rather than sanctions which would push them back to their misdeeds of old," junior Foreign Minister Renaud Muselier told French radio.

France led opposition to US moves at the UN over Iraq. As was the case in Iraq, France also has significant oil interests in Sudan.

Mr Muselier also dismissed claims of "ethnic cleansing" or genocide in Darfur.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3875277.stm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud

Sudan has no resources? Get real dude! The French already have their oil deals arranged in that country! :rolleyes:





'World's worst humanitarian crisis'
"In Darfur, it would be better to help the Sudanese get over the crisis so their country is pacified rather than sanctions which would push them back to their misdeeds of old," junior Foreign Minister Renaud Muselier told French radio.

France led opposition to US moves at the UN over Iraq. As was the case in Iraq, France also has significant oil interests in Sudan.

Mr Muselier also dismissed claims of "ethnic cleansing" or genocide in Darfur.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3875277.stm

---

Right, but the US has oil interests in the middle east, so that's why they "free" those people instead of people in the Sudan.

No interest = no freedom.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by F L E S H

Right, but the US has oil interests in the middle east, so that's why they "free" those people instead of people in the Sudan.

No interest = no freedom.

---

Wasn't our companies pumping oil during Saddam, it was French and Russian. The French are tied all up in Sudan, so why should it be the U.S.? Why not France?

the US involvement is not a newfound whim of philanthropy by Washington. There is a deliberate strategic national interest: access to oil. Since the Clinton administration, the US has been angling to diversify its oil supplies away from the turbulent Middle East region.

The US has increased policing of the West Africaâ??s oil producing region. The US carrier USS Harry Truman has been deployed on Africaâ??s Atlantic coast under an exercise dubbed "Summer Pulse 04".

The US passes off the exercise as part of the war against terror, but the reason is the oilfields off the west coast of Africa, described as the fastest growing source of oil over the past 10 years.

The US strategic interests in Africa are in the unveiling of the "Africa Doctrine" last year, which involves stability of oil states and therefore energy security. One of the pillars of the doctrine is the African Coastal Security Programme announced in April 2003, weeks before the invasion of Iraq. To ensure stability in the supply of oil, the US is helping the Nigerian military contain civil unrest. And Nigeria has received four of seven military ships.

Despite insistent denials by US Assistant Secretary of State for Africa, Mr Walter Kansteiner, the signs are that a navy base is likely in the Gulf of Guinea, possibly on the Island of Sao Tome, where America is funding a deep-sea port. The US oil interests target Africaâ??s 20 per cent oil contribution to the world market and 60 million barrels of proven oil reserves west of the continent.

In June 2002, the BBC quoted oil industry sources confident of deep-water discoveries that would boost the production on the Atlantic rim for old players like Nigeria, Angola, Gabon, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, and newcomers like Sao Tome.

Sudan falls into this orbit not for its current production levels but for its potential to supplement the Gulf of Guinea oil belt. With peace imminent in southern Sudan, Darfur can only be an inconvenience to a possible link line from Chad to the previously "blood oil" in Southern Sudan.

THE discovery of oil in Africa would seem to have begun to reinsert the continent into the dynamics of world trade and has resuscitated considerable interest on the part of the US government. In the autumn of 2002, the British magazine The Economist made an accusation to that effect that was echoed by officials and researchers.

In an interview for Asia Times Online published in the fall of 2003, US security analyst Michael Klare, the author of Resource Wars, warned of Washingtonâ??s potential implication on the African continent. When asked where the next oil conflict after Iraq could emerge, Klare responded, "I think in Africa, the situation there is heating up."

To illustrate the basis for such statements, in 2001 a report by Vice President Richard Cheney on US national energy policy affirmed that Africa would be "one of the fastest-growing sources of oil and gas for the United States."

http://granmai.cubaweb.com/ingles/20...7/28petro.html

Saddam and Chirac: 30 Years of Sleaze
NewsMax.com Wires
Wednesday, April 9, 2003
France has desperately and publicly sought a peaceful solution of the Iraqi crisis with a sole strategic goal: strong influence if not control of the world's future leading oil reserves.
At the same time, French President Jacques Chirac has consolidated his status as heir of former President Charles De Gaulle's policy of independence from the United States.

The Iraqi government remembered Chirac's predecessor Francois Mitterrand's opposition to allied action to evict Iraqi forces from Kuwait, before ultimately joining the Desert Storm coalition, and thus suspected France would eventually not use its veto power to block a second U.N. resolution. With good reason: If it were to have a stake in postwar oil developments, France must have realized it needed to be seen as a supporter of the "coalition of the willing."

Although the veto option did not materialize, opponents of the Iraqi regime accuse France of duplicity, citing opposition to use of force against Saddam's regime as a prime example. They see the French challenge to U.S. hegemony as propaganda for Arab consumption, in an attempt to divert attention from France's own objectives in Iraq.

Funded by the Genocidal Maniac

Opposition leaders accuse France of freely violating international law and the U.N. charter when it comes to safeguarding its interests and argue that Paris' opposition to war was solely to avert its good friend and client Saddam Hussein's ouster.

They point to a quarter of a century of such close relations that Baghdad generously contributed to Chirac's election campaigns and made annual donations to the Gaullist Rassemblement Pour La Republique political party, founded by Chirac.

They cite mutual public declarations of admiration made by the two leaders during Chirac's 1975 trip to Baghdad as prime minister, a visit that ushered in the golden age in French-Iraqi relations.

Shortly thereafter, France provided financial and technical assistance for the Ozirak, Iraq's first nuclear reactor. Israel eventually bombed the Ozirak, keeping Saddam from having a nuclear offensive capability during the Gulf War in 1990-91. At the time, Chirac's critics called him "Jacques Ozirak," much as now U.S. commentators have taken to referring to the French president as "Jacques Iraq."

Follow the Money, Oil, Weapons ...

After Chirac's 1975 visit, Iraq became the leading buyer of French arms, as well as France's main oil supplier. In fact from 1980 until Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait, exports to Iraq and Saudi Arabia accounted for 75 percent of France's total arms sales, with the United States eventually taking the lead in Saudi Arabia.

The situation has been further complicated by a struggle between France and Russia over commercial dominance in Iraq.

France was strongly criticized by Baghdad last year when it agreed to the U.N. imposing "smart sanctions" against Iraq. At the time, the Iraqi newspaper Babel, run by Saddam's eldest son Uday, warned France its stance endangered French oil "interests and privileges" in Iraq.

France's leading oil company, Total Elf, which has held exclusive negotiating rights for the huge Majnoun and Bin Omar oil fields, was about to sign new contracts late last year, prior to the Iraqi oil minister being dismissed for canceling contracts with Russia.


Stifling the Opposition

In a bid to recoup its position, the Chirac regime has been the sole major European country refusing to receive Iraqi opposition leaders or hold official discussions with them.

Thus the diplomatic dilemma for Jacques Chirac: Having viewed French interests better served with a friendly Saddam Hussein in power, he has rightly feared the U.S.-led coalition would topple the Iraqi despot. And with good reason.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti.../9/91851.shtml

France was Iraqs largest arms dealer, France sold nuclear designs to Iraq, let the damn French clean up their own mess, FOR ONCE, in Sudan!

Follow the Money, Oil, Weapons ... <----yes exactly right! Just don't isolate one country as any less guilty than the others...

Let me reiterate.....

USA, Russia, France and Britain do the largest businesses of arms trade in the world. Sometimes, these arms sales are made secretly and sometimes knowingly to human rights violators, military dictatorships and corrupt governments. This does not promote democracy in those nations........it is wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlueCat

USA, Russia, France and Britain do the largest businesses of arms trade in the world. Sometimes, these arms sales are made secretly and sometimes knowingly to human rights violators, military dictatorships and corrupt governments. This does not promote democracy in those nations........it is wrong.

---

Arms for special interests, self interests instead of humanitarian for oil, etc... Unfortunately thats what makes the world go around.

Like I said before, I surely ain't gonna worry about it I just hope all these dumb fucks don't go to far and blow us all up! The only way, I believe, for a country now days to stay "pure" is to be complete isolationists. You know how it is though, you take away one asshole problem and there's another to replace it.

Actually Costa Rica got rid of it's standing Army and put all the money into social programs. They have some of the best medical care in the world. It is better than the US medical care in many ways...

The have also invested highly in Ecotourism and it has worked out really well.
I can't wait to move there.

You will not convince me that making weapons and selling them to other countries so they can blow each other away is an OK accepted practice. It never will be for me, ever. I don't believe that is what makes the world go around. Its not OK becuase every country is doing it. Every country is wrong.

I live my life with a clear conscience...

Remember what I said about assholes? Get rid of one another will be there to step it up!

By the time the February 2002 elections rolled around, however, Ticos (a term locals use to refer to themselves) were mumbling about a lack of government transparency and shady deals between political mates. These grass-roots misgivings resulted in a 'no win' election, and pollsters returned to the ballot box in April 2002. RodrÃ*guez's successor, Abel Pacheco of the conservative Social Christian Unity Party, was elected to step up to the president's ring.

Pacheco began his term promising to eliminate the public debt within four years. He launched a conservationist platform banning new oil drilling and mining and proposed legislation guaranteeing citizens the right to a healthy environment. It didn't take long before the sheen paled. A campaign finance scandal clouded his presidency, leading some opponents to demand his resignation, and it became unclear if he could weather this storm through to the end of his term in 2006.
http://www.lonelyplanet.com/destinat...ca/history.htm


A country like Costa Rica can afford the luxury of going without an army. Backed by the entire U.N. not to mention big brother to the North, they're about as safe as a baby in a cradle!


P.S. I think it's wrong to but its old buisiness throughout this world. UNfortunately!

I am still looking forward to a change...and things are headed in the right direction in Costa Rica.....
No country can be without corruption....but I pick my battles. I do not agree with arms sales, or warprofiteering so I have found a place where that is not an issue.

Do you plan on becoming a citizen? What is the process? GREAT climat!!!

You can become a citizen in just 6 mos. and then all your medical is covered 100% and you don't have to give up your US citizenship...the medical care is so good that many people are flying there to have major surgery like heart bypasses because the care is so good and it is so cheap. The hospital food is excellent and they give a family member a bed as well. Family is "expected" to stay all for one cost.

We have a lot doctor friends that have retired there.... I can post a few info links if you like...

I found this:

http://www.cocori.com/library/life/living.htm

I take it you fit the criteria. Wish ya the best!!! I have to check into that offshore banking....could be interesting! :D

These are better links....you will have to come put your toes in the sand sometime. :D

http://www.costaricapages.com/

http://www.costaricatouring.com/

http://www.tourism.co.cr/

[QUOTE=Psycho4Bud]Arms for special interests, self interests instead of humanitarian for oil, etc... Unfortunately thats what makes the world go around.

that just goes to show how wrong you are, you are an idiot man, stop defending america and putting down other countries like france

one thing is cetain all great nations that attempt to take over fail
the roman empire, the epyption/pharoah shit, napolean, hitler
and one day the US...whether it takes another couple 9/11s to happen in the states or whatever i hope somethnig happens to put an end to the evil empire: USA

but what do i know i aint a history major like half of you clowns

[QUOTE=dooman]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud

Arms for special interests, self interests instead of humanitarian for oil, etc... Unfortunately thats what makes the world go around.

that just goes to show how wrong you are, you are an idiot man, stop defending america and putting down other countries like france

one thing is cetain all great nations that attempt to take over fail
the roman empire, the epyption/pharoah shit, napolean, hitler
and one day the US...whether it takes another couple 9/11s to happen in the states or whatever i hope somethnig happens to put an end to the evil empire: USA

but what do i know i aint a history major like half of you clowns

---

I'm an idiot, put an end to my beloved evil empire? Only one thing I got to say to you dude........

BWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!! :D

And a short cartoon for your viewing pleasure: :D

LMAO now that was funny..... :D :D

lol me funny