Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
[align=left]Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?[/align]
The terrorist they didn't catch but tried to fool the American public with a spelling mistake
[align=left]Paul Joseph Watson | May 18 2005[/align]
[align=left]This website has documented many times before the fact that whenever an arrest of a high level terrorist suspect is announced in every single case theyâ??re either dead, theyâ??ve already been arrested or they pop up a week later in a different country.[/align]
[align=left]In the case of this latest arrest the US government has successfully hoodwinked the entire nation into believing that a person is someone theyâ??re not.[/align]
[align=left]He was presented to us as Al-Qaeda number three, closely associated with bin Laden, someone who had recent contact with bin Laden and someone who could lead us to bin Laden.[/align]
[align=left]Fox News revelled in it for days, another sign that Bush is winning the war on terror. I watched the snivelling Neo-Con John Gibsonâ??s show and they had government officials and current CIA agents on snickering about how they wished they were in the interrogation room with the Pakistanis so they could torture this guy.[/align]
[align=left]And it turns out of course that our friend Mr. Al Libbi is not Al-Qaeda number three at all. The London Times described him as among the flotsam jetsam of the organization.[/align]
[align=left]Al Libbi is spelt L I B B I and the real Mr. Al Libby is spelt L I B B Y â?? so on the basis of a misspelt name this flotsam jetsam becomes Al-Qaeda number three, becomes a justification that the war on terror is real in the first place, becomes justification that Bush is winning the war on terror and that sacrificing our rights is working, becomes justification for renewing the Patriot Act and becomes part of the script theyâ??re working on for when they capture their friend Osama.[/align]
All that on the basis of a spelling mistake and yet the American people are none the wiser because itâ??s only in the European newspapers.
Weâ??re going to be hearing about the Newsweek retraction about the Koran story for weeks. Whereâ??s the retraction that they captured Al-Qaeda number three? Because they didnâ??t.
They captured a nobody with a similar sounding name.
They have to keep faking these arrests because people are starting to get wise and ask a simple question - if weâ??re in a war on terror then why havenâ??t we been attacked for four years. Ah... because weâ??re winning of course. Weâ??ve smoked them out and got them on the run.
When they bring out Al-Zarqawi it will be the reward for staying the course in Iraq, for re-upping the stop loss because we caught the killer. And no one will mention that major newspapers all over the world keep reporting heâ??s either been killed or captured over and over again but the Pentagon pays no attention to it because if heâ??s going to be captured then heâ??s going to be captured by them and no one else.
They need the gas mileage that staged capture will give them to stay in Iraq and establish the military bases needed to launch the attack on Iran.
Itâ??s all theatre, all the time.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
why do they need gas mileage??the war is going better than anyone thought.if you gave the american people a vote on wether or not to stay,WE WOULD STAY.
with democracy revolutions sprouting up all over the region,people will do and say anything to discredit all the obvious victories.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
democracy is one of the worst forms of government, if not the worst according to the founders of this country. but i don't blame you, the word's been drilled into your head so many times that you think it's a good thing.
i can remember at 15 times where we've been told they caught some big guy, and it was top story for a few days...then a few days later it's "oh we were wrong, it was some tinpot loser..." with not even 1% of the same publicity.
this is called propaganda.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
sure,it really looks like democracy is a terrible,terrible form of govt.!!
i know the govt uses propaganda.so what?
i could care less wether or not that guy is important,you know as well as i do that if he isnt libbi,he sure wasnt hanging out with noble citizens.fuck em.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
i would love to hear what system of govt. pisshead would enjoy.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
i'll tell you...a constituional republic. separation of power, checks and balances...bill of rights.
rescind all executive orders which are inherently unconstitutional, and get rid of all corporate welfare and foreign aid...
no drug war as an excuse to take away rights. and no unconstitutional property laws...
i could go on for a long long long time, but that would be a start.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
well,those things are NEVER going to happen.
as for someone who loves talking about propaganda,all your sites you quote,do you know what that is??ITS PROPAGANDA!!how can you not see that.you always say that the govt is using scare tactics?kinda seems that they have already defeated you.you are more afraid than anyone else on this site.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
I just went to this site and saw where else the money could be going... when you really think about it why spend 170 billion to kill people?? are they really that bad??
http://costofwar.com/
ps, amsterdam is halliburton, halliburt? oh cheeny's company? That'd explian why you love war so much... if not, just curious as to what it is is all..
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
Halliburton,founded in 1919 is one of the worlds largest providers of products and services to oil and gas companies.The company adds value through the entire lifecycle of oil and gas reservoirs.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pisshead
no drug war as an excuse to take away rights. and no unconstitutional property laws.
I'm all for the war on drugs.
Just not cannabis, which is readily available to everyone on this site anyway :p .
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Button Basher
I'm all for the war on drugs.
Just not cannabis, which is readily available to everyone on this site anyway :p .
my thoughts exactly.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
is that a joke that you love them or do you really... cause if you do that's awesome, i've never met one... I thought that's what that was... wasn't sure of the name though, just know that it was the business he and the bin ladens were incorp. with.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
i dont mind halliburton.i just thought the avatar was funny.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
You can't expect the truth from a media that is censored.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
i thought carl levin was gonna jump over the bench and bich slap him.
Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?
