Dear Wall Street

I thought this would bring a grin to ones face....No matter which side of the Isle you stand on!

Dear Wall Street,

Hi, this is the lobbyist for a group called The Taxpayers, Debtors, and Insured People of the United States. Now that we've rejected the first bailout plan, I'm sure that in the spirit of tough, free market capitalism, and spirited negotiations, you'll consider our second offer. Here are some terms that I'm SURE you will find reasonable:

1) We are willing to loan you money at a very low, introductory rate of 8.9%. If you are even one nanosecond late on your payment, your rate will go from 8.9% to 32.9% instantly. You will have no right to appeal this. The interest rate increase will be retroactive. None of this "but I mailed it out Friday" nonsense. We must get it, and the check must clear, for your payment to count. A reminder: transactions that occur after 2pm are not credited until the next business day, so be sure to make your payments before then.

2) If you are late on any of your other payments to your other creditors, your rate will also be spiked to 32.9%. I know it has nothing to do with us, but if you are late paying someone else, then OBVIOUSLY you are a bigger credit risk to us.

3) We will send you onerous terms and conditions 148,000,000 pages long in 6 point font. Of course, those terms can change on a whim, at any time, so we'll be sending you hourly updates to the contract, which we expect you to read and keep up with. Sorry, we will be the only ones that can amend the contract; you cannot.

4) You will have a predetermined credit line, and if you go over it by even $1, your interest rate will spike to 54.9%. Sorry, it's in the contract on page 109,209,392.

5) The bankruptcy laws have now changed. If you get into a bind, I'm afraid you won't find much sympathy; no more silly excuses will be accepted. We are going to have the titles to all of your buildings and physical assets put in our name, so when the inevitable time comes and you trip up, we'll simply take everything from you. There will be no court hearing.

6) We'll be conducting a background check, driving records check, drug test, and disease risk check of all of the top executives of your firm. After all, you're a riskier loan if you have any of those afflictions, aren't you? Well, if we find ANYTHING wrong, your interest rate will skyrocket, instantly, and without notice.

7) If your business is located in a "bad neighborhood", or a "poor city", or a "hurricane zone", or "flood plane", or "terrorist targeted city", as defined by us, we can raise your interest rates at any time, to any rate we choose.

For the last quarter century or so, you've imposed these terms, or some variation of them on us, when loaning us money or insuring us... arguing every single time that it's "necessary" and that these sorts of changes "will result in more profitable companies that will pass the savings along to consumers". Well, now that we're in the role of lender, and you're in the role of borrower, we're sure that you'll find these same terms fair.

Wall Street, prove the cynics wrong and accept our new plan. Prove to everyone that you're not the hypocrites that everyone thinks you are.

Best regards,

THE TAXPAYERS, DEBTORS, AND INSURED PEOPLES OF THE USA


Offer not valid in all 50 states. Terms, conditions, and interest rates subject to change at any time without notice. Borrower subject to intrusive credit, background, education, and criminal checks before issuance of loan. Upon any dispute, arbitration will be decided by someone tilted to rule in favor of taxpayers, and not by any indepedant or otherwise objective authority.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Figment

1) We are willing to loan you money at a very low, introductory rate of 8.9%. If you are even one nanosecond late on your payment, your rate will go from 8.9% to 32.9% instantly. You will have no right to appeal this. The interest rate increase will be retroactive. None of this "but I mailed it out Friday" nonsense. We must get it, and the check must clear, for your payment to count. A reminder: transactions that occur after 2pm are not credited until the next business day, so be sure to make your payments before then.

2) If you are late on any of your other payments to your other creditors, your rate will also be spiked to 32.9%. I know it has nothing to do with us, but if you are late paying someone else, then OBVIOUSLY you are a bigger credit risk to us.

3) We will send you onerous terms and conditions 148,000,000 pages long in 6 point font. Of course, those terms can change on a whim, at any time, so we'll be sending you hourly updates to the contract, which we expect you to read and keep up with. Sorry, we will be the only ones that can amend the contract; you cannot.

4) You will have a predetermined credit line, and if you go over it by even $1, your interest rate will spike to 54.9%. Sorry, it's in the contract on page 109,209,392.

---

:S2:

if this material is originally yours i seriously urge u to send it to your state rep as it is or just send it to some media outlet... or blog about it.... its worth being out there and getting some attention... maybe some see how things are n how they are always gonna lose on other peoples terms

Bravo! This made me smile. :D

Blessed be~

That was great, thanks for sharing. It is an outrage...and you make the case!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flyingimam

:S2:

if this material is originally yours i seriously urge u to send it to your state rep as it is or just send it to some media outlet... or blog about it.... its worth being out there and getting some attention... maybe some see how things are n how they are always gonna lose on other peoples terms

---

I regret to say that I did not author this...in fact it was posted on another board,but without the Authors name. Oh and it WILL make it in to more than a few inboxes in Washington.....The Board it comes from has Four Million registered users.....all PISSED!!!!!!!!

I thought that #6 and #7 were spot on!

It never seems to amaze me that people will carry a flag, yet have no idea why they are doing so. From the many perspectives i have encountered, many of you seem to be in line with the good doctor (Paul) and his undying willingness to restore free market capitalism. Some of you have even seen RP on CNN calling for no bailout, yet fail to analyze the situation for what it is. He cannot, about face in regards to the situation, or else he would face future backlash as a "flip flopper".

You will never find a bigger Ron Paul supporter than myself. I studied at the Mises institute in Auburn, went to meet up groups, campaigned, studied Austrian theory, etc...

Even if Ron Paul were to become president, he would not allow people to be thrown into the streets. He preaches small government, but he would not cut social security right off the bat. He is against regulation of markets, but would not instantly deregulate the economy.

I guess the point i am trying to get across is... A collapse of the financial system is not something the good doctor would allow even if he were the chief executive. Alot of you believe that a collapse will lead us to a more free future, and i hate to say this, but you are mistaken. All this collapse will do is instill government even more power at the price of your liberty. If anyone disagree's i am open to your opinion, but will call out logical fallacy.

So, why do you believe a financial collapse is benifitial to this nation?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GoldenBoy812

So, why do you believe a financial collapse is benifitial to this nation?

---

I agree. We must do what we can to prevent this like collapse of the credit markets, no matter how distasteful or how philosophically or ideologically opposed we are to the IDEA of a bailout.We cannot cut off our nose to spite our face. But I an pissed livid about the fact that we find ourselves in this situation, and because of the frustration and where I place the blame, I found the letter very funny!

So now that I am done laughing, I want to see the fucking congress get back to work and keep us from sliding into the Great Depression II.

Donâ??t Blame Wall Street - At Least Not Completely

September 29, 2008

My dear friends, Americans, we stand this day on the precipice of abyss, and while I never mince words, I neither exaggerate words in saying so. A horrible misconception is greatly disturbing me, and I feel it's fueling a good deal of argument against this bill.

You want to blame the rich blue suits of Wall Street, because you are sure they are to blame and you are comforted to hear others doing so as well. Also, you see Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns now nonexistent and Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) fighting for survival. You note the stock market is nearing 30% collapse, and you see Wall Street on the front page of your daily paper. You hear about the excessive compensation of self-seeking CEOs, and you witness the witch hunt for their heads as human behavior drives counteraction.

Many people, many segments of American industry are to blame for the mess we are in, and even you and I are to blame. Just the same, it was Wall Street's contribution to this mess that is the same contribution which allows almost every American the opportunity to own a vehicle, and even a home. What separates the average American from the average third world suffering citizen is surely in part American creativity, invention and will.

Why does a man in one nation have a job at Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT), Target (NYSE: TGT), The Olive Garden (NYSE: DRI) or Disneyland (NYSE: DIS), and own a car and a home, while another across the world struggles to keep his family alive? You can partly thank Wall Street for that, because one man is not more intelligent than the other, nor embodies greater work ethic than the other.

Wall Street did nothing more than create financial securities, specifically secondary markets in asset backed securities, that allowed Americans to live the American dream.

They created securities, they bought them and sold them, held them for investment and traded them for fee. That's all they did.

Meanwhile, as a result, the every day Joe was able to own a home and a new car too.

I'm not saying that excess does not exist on Wall Street; that would be gravely naive.

Certainly excesses generated from greed took a well-intended idea, however profitable, and led it to dangerous extreme. But Wall Street is not solely to blame for that, nor is Wall Street solely to blame for every stock market downturn or economic cycle trough. Wall Street bears the pain the most, and enjoys the fruit at the highest.

Let's not overlook others equally at fault:

Credit Rating Agencies

Let's start with the credit rating agencies, Standard & Poor's (NYSE: MHP) and Moody's (NYSE: MCO), that supposedly analyzed these securities and negligently labeled too many of them investment grade. That little mistake which made no difference as long as home values rose, made all the difference as the housing bubble busted. It was their job to decide how risky these investments were, so how hard was it to envision the scenario of home price decline and why didn't they? Is price decline so abnormal as to not be included in scenario analysis?

Each bank that now owns these securities, and falls into bankruptcy because of holding them, trusted these organizations to do their job correctly. They were supposedly a trustworthy voice to be believed in these matters. Nothing was sold that was not rated by these organizations. So don't blame Wall Street alone while ignoring Water Street!

These assets, whether backed by mortgage loans, commercial loans or consumer credits, embody the securities the Treasury Secretary plans to buy with your $700 billion. These are the illiquid assets that are clogging the financial system. These are the securities that prevent banks from lending to one another. These are the securities that marked-to-market are now worth well below the value they were suppose to have, the value that was supposedly appropriate for the risk born.

These are the securities that cause your banks to take massive charges. These are the securities that lead to insolvency. These are the securities that have caused bankruptcy. These are the securities that our government now needs your tax money to purchase, $700 billion to $2 trillion in total, to remove from the balance sheets of our financial system. So, if you are looking to place blame, consider these firms equally to Wall Street's financial designers.

Mortgage Brokers

It was mortgage brokers who created liar loans. It was mortgage brokers who extended opportunity beyond its natural reach. It was mortgage brokers who propagated the excesses of housing price rise, partly at least. Most of these people are out of their jobs now, but many banked their profits and walked away. Sure, after the fact, many came to trial, but part of the blame belongs there as well. Also, some of the banks that originated these loans took on great risk for the sake of greed. These banks are not on Wall Street, but it's easier to blame the guys on the golden hill for all our woes. Greedy men in these other banks originated bad loans, and sought Wall Street's help to package them and sell them since they could be rated investment grade and dumped onto others. That greed is partly to blame as well.

Ourselves

Look no further than the mirror.

We neglected these errors. You and I, our elected officials, and the agencies we've established to watch over the activities of mortgage brokers, credit rating agencies, lending practices and securities creation, the collective group of us failed.
And please do not politicize this. This is not a Republican problem nor a Bush Administration issue. It's not the creation of the Democratic Party either. This is not John McCain's fault, nor Barak Obama's misunderstanding. This is a problem endemic to our society.

Society

Our society is to blame - our encouragement of easy living and good times.

The cheating we overlook in our schools, the free pass we give to negligence there; the selfishness throughout our society and deficiencies of our family structure; these are to blame as well. The easy going mentality that we have sown into our society, the 9 to 5 work day we arrange so as to allow for the life we think we deserve, this is to blame. The little consideration we give to our day's work and to our life's passing, this is to blame.

More specifically, the priority we give to Thursday night bar outings, beginning in college and extending throughout our lives in many instances, this is to blame. The priority we give to sports over church, this is to blame. The speed with which we rush to fight, before we offer outreach, this is to blame. The "entitled-to mentality," the "me first" way of thinking, this is to blame. The circle within which we enclose our love ones, and at the same time use to keep out the rest of the world, this is to blame.

People just like you and me made these mistakes, and people like me and you allowed it to happen by not staying informed with the goings on of our society and by not seeking to improve upon it. But, we looked the other way didn't we. After all, we were happy while driving our new cars, which we surely could not afford without credit nor deserved due to equal value work completed. Same goes for that first home we purchased. It made it easy to look the other way, to completely miss the "too good to be true" rule.

So don't go blaming some fictional enemy you've created on Wall Street. I've been to Wall Street. I worked on Wall Street. I know Wall Street, and it's no different than Main Street.

Of all the fools I've seen speak today in the House of Representatives, there were a few clear-minded voices I now admire. Maxine Waters, for one, is neither from my neighborhood nor from my party, but she made perfect sense today and her voice deserves credit.

Not Bailing Out Wall Street

The most important point I can make is that we are not bailing out Wall Street.

Wall Street is bankrupt already. The Wall Street machine is broken. We're not bailing out Wall Street, but if we were, they would deserve as much as the Main Street banks we really are saving. Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) is not located on Wall Street. Wachovia (NYSE: WB) is neither on Wall Street. National City (NYSE: NCC) is no where near Wall Street. Corruption is not isolated to any one place, no matter what you think. Also, wealthy individuals are NOT always corrupt, whether they own a car lot in Pennsylvania or a brokerage firm on Wall Street. You know as well as I do, corruption is not a rarity in our society. Selfishness is not uncommon. So, please do not draw a black circle around a place somewhere far away where people just like you and me live and work. Some of the worst men I'll ever know work on Wall Street, but some of the best men I'll ever know also do.

Our financial system needs fixing. This is the problem. These assets and their faults are not the sole responsibility of Wall Street, though Wall Street is feeling the pain more than anyone so far. You know, sometimes the sick are shunned just because they are ill. Lepers were sent to far away places long ago, just because they had a problem. All throughout history, men have been blamed for their own problems. People have been killed because of the problems of smaller societies they dwelled within. Wall Street is reliant on trade, and so when liquidity dried up, Wall Street got sick first. But, this problem is not the sole responsibility of Wall Street.

Sometimes people are to blame for the problems of many innocent, but these assets have existed for a long time my dear friends, and our economy thrived partly because of them. The average Joe in America has lived a far better life than the average Joe in the third world, partly because of these securities that allowed for it. So, while I will not absolve Wall Street of all blame, I will not attribute all the blame to those folks either. But, most importantly, the other financial institutions now sick with the cancer of these securities need radical surgery. Otherwise, make no mistake, you will get sick as well. These are your banks, and they fund your life.

The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 just failed in the House of Representatives. I am reviewing the bill in detail. I suspect I will also find faults with it. However, we must support some form of government intervention, which I believe should be based upon the Paulson plan; because otherwise I believe we very well could see the support of the failings of Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich led bull-headed, self-righteousness (and ignorance) help to destroy American life as we know it.

Don�t Blame Wall Street - At Least Not Completely - Seeking Alpha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GoldenBoy812

It never seems to amaze me that people will carry a flag, yet have no idea why they are doing so. From the many perspectives i have encountered, many of you seem to be in line with the good doctor (Paul) and his undying willingness to restore free market capitalism. Some of you have even seen RP on CNN calling for no bailout, yet fail to analyze the situation for what it is. He cannot, about face in regards to the situation, or else he would face future backlash as a "flip flopper".

You will never find a bigger Ron Paul supporter than myself. I studied at the Mises institute in Auburn, went to meet up groups, campaigned, studied Austrian theory, etc...

Even if Ron Paul were to become president, he would not allow people to be thrown into the streets. He preaches small government, but he would not cut social security right off the bat. He is against regulation of markets, but would not instantly deregulate the economy.

I guess the point i am trying to get across is... A collapse of the financial system is not something the good doctor would allow even if he were the chief executive. Alot of you believe that a collapse will lead us to a more free future, and i hate to say this, but you are mistaken. All this collapse will do is instill government even more power at the price of your liberty. If anyone disagree's i am open to your opinion, but will call out logical fallacy.

So, why do you believe a financial collapse is benifitial to this nation?

---

I believe it will be required to fix our ridiculous over complicated securities sytem on wall street. Futures markets need to be done away with along with hegde funds and alot more. Just allow companies to go public and sell stocks if they want period. It doesn't need to be any more complicated than that. Along with our tax system. Just scrap it and go to some simple flat tax system. Then we could do away with 90% of the IRS and maybe shtudown the fed and the fcc. There are so many oversight government orgs. in this country. We have become a socialist welfare state. Its getting to where there are more people working for all the different government orgs. than there are in private industry. And don't even mention prevailing wage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by killerweed420

I believe it will be required to fix our ridiculous over complicated securities sytem on wall street.

---

Good:thumbsup:

Quote:

---

Futures markets need to be done away with along with hegde funds and alot more. Just allow companies to go public and sell stocks if they want period.

---

Here i disagree. Futures markets save the consumer big time. Reason be, if there is a huge spike in oil, and futures contracts did not exist, you would have a scenario of rapid cost push inflation.

For example, if the airlines has to purchase fuel at a static market cost (what it is that day), when oil spikes, costs would either have to be turned over to the customer at a fairly fast rate or firms would have to take a loss. But most probable, the firms would not be able to turnover increased costs fast enough to save face, which would result in many cases negative operation income due to commodity dynamism.

A rapid cost push inflation scenario would arise as prices would have to be raised in accordance to increased business costs. Such a jump in overall costs could be damaging to economies (all of them in the world) where wages do not catch up to inflation at a fast enough rate.

Quote:

---

It doesn't need to be any more complicated than that.

---

Yes it does, sorry to say:stoned:

Quote:

---

Along with our tax system. Just scrap it and go to some simple flat tax system. Then we could do away with 90% of the IRS and maybe shtudown the fed and the fcc.

---

Technically, a flat tax is still an income tax, therefore it would still go with the Federal Reserve and SEC (FCC is federal Communications :D).

I do agree a simpler tax system would save billions in administrative costs, but think of all the poor accountants that would be out of work:jointsmile: (of course im only kidding, i really do not care for accountants as a whole).

Quote:

---

There are so many oversight government orgs. in this country. We have become a socialist welfare state. Its getting to where there are more people working for all the different government orgs. than there are in private industry. And don't even mention prevailing wage.

---

That is because the WWII generation not only allowed it, but brainwashed their children into believing in its virtues. My generation, i believe, will be the ray of light for this country...

futures markets can protect consumers from spikes in the price of oil, but they can also cause spikes in the price of oil...the futures market needs more regulation to limit speculators from screwing us (again)



Testimony of
Michael W. Masters
Managing Member / Portfolio Manager
Masters Capital Management, LLC
before the
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
United States Senate

May 20, 2008

Good morning and thank you, Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, for the
invitation to speak to you today. This is a topic that I care deeply about, and I
appreciate the chance to share what I have discovered.

I have been successfully managing a long-short equity hedge fund for over 12 years
and I have extensive contacts on Wall Street and within the hedge fund community. Itʼs
important that you know that I am not currently involved in trading the commodities
futures markets. I am not representing any corporate, financial, or lobby organizations. I
am speaking with you today as a concerned citizen whose professional background has
given me insight into a situation that I believe is negatively affecting the U.S. economy.
While some in my profession might be disappointed that I am presenting this testimony
to Congress, I feel that it is the right thing to do.

You have asked the question â??Are Institutional Investors contributing to food and energy price inflation?â?�
And my unequivocal answer is â??YES.â?� In this testimony I will explain that Institutional Investors are one of,
if not the primary, factors affecting commodities prices today. Clearly, there are many factors that contribute
to price determination in the commodities markets; I am here to expose a fast-growing yet virtually unnoticed
factor, and one that presents a problem that can be expediently corrected through legislative policy action.

Commodities prices have increased more in the aggregate over the last five years than
at any other time in U.S. history.

We have seen commodity price spikes occur in the
past as a result of supply crises, such as during the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo. But today,
unlike previous episodes, supply is ample: there are no lines at the gas pump and there
is plenty of food on the shelves.

If supply is adequate - as has been shown by others who have testified before this
committee - and prices are still rising, then demand must be increasing. But how do
you explain a continuing increase in demand when commodity prices have doubled or
tripled in the last 5 years?

What we are experiencing is a demand shock coming from a new category of
participant in the commodities futures markets: Institutional Investors. Specifically,
these are Corporate and Government Pension Funds, Sovereign Wealth Funds,
University Endowments and other Institutional Investors. Collectively, these investors
now account on average for a larger share of outstanding commodities futures contracts
than any other market participant.

These parties, who I call Index Speculators, allocate a portion of their portfolios to
â??investmentsâ?� in the commodities futures market, and behave very differently from the
traditional speculators that have always existed in this marketplace. I refer to them as
â??Indexâ?� Speculators because of their investing strategy: they distribute their
allocation of dollars across the 25 key commodities futures according to the popular indices â?? the
Standard & Poors - Goldman Sachs Commodity Index and the Dow Jones - AIG
Commodity Index.

*snip*

some familiar names there...where have i heard of them before????

read more here:
hsgac.senate.gov/public/_files/052008Masters.pdf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GoldenBoy812

It never seems to amaze me that people will carry a flag, yet have no idea why they are doing so. From the many perspectives i have encountered, many of you seem to be in line with the good doctor (Paul) and his undying willingness to restore free market capitalism. Some of you have even seen RP on CNN calling for no bailout, yet fail to analyze the situation for what it is. He cannot, about face in regards to the situation, or else he would face future backlash as a "flip flopper".

You will never find a bigger Ron Paul supporter than myself. I studied at the Mises institute in Auburn, went to meet up groups, campaigned, studied Austrian theory, etc...

Even if Ron Paul were to become president, he would not allow people to be thrown into the streets. He preaches small government, but he would not cut social security right off the bat. He is against regulation of markets, but would not instantly deregulate the economy.

I guess the point i am trying to get across is... A collapse of the financial system is not something the good doctor would allow even if he were the chief executive. Alot of you believe that a collapse will lead us to a more free future, and i hate to say this, but you are mistaken. All this collapse will do is instill government even more power at the price of your liberty. If anyone disagree's i am open to your opinion, but will call out logical fallacy.

So, why do you believe a financial collapse is benifitial to this nation?

---

The stock market sure isn't doing good...And if a collapse were to happen, and the government tried to take more liberty than they already have from us, there would most certainly be a revolution...As each day passes by I believe it's getting closer and closer..The government is supposed to be servant rather than our master, but that's certainly not the case here..and people are beginning to realize what's going on..

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -Thomas Jefferson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Markass

The stock market sure isn't doing good...And if a collapse were to happen, and the government tried to take more liberty than they already have from us, there would most certainly be a revolution...As each day passes by I believe it's getting closer and closer..The government is supposed to be servant rather than our master, but that's certainly not the case here..and people are beginning to realize what's going on..

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -Thomas Jefferson

---

What if people are desperate? Desperation paved the way for FDR to push big government throughout the republic.

You have two scenarios really:

1.) The bailout works; new leadership is ushered by way of baby boomer power demise. New leadership will in fact encompass our generation, paving the way for liberty and justice for all.

2.) The bailout does not work, and the world suddenly stops doing shit. If Americans do not have money to buy things, China collapses. Paper debasement via Asian states redeeming their US treasury certificates surfaces, which could force the treasury to offer better interest rates. Liquidity would drain from free market investment into that of government insured paper, sending retirement accounts into a frenzy. Those that were to retire work longer, offering less jobs to new graduates. Massive deflation follows...

Nobody in their right or blazed mind wants scenario 2.:jointsmile:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maladroit

futures markets can protect consumers from spikes in the price of oil, but they can also cause spikes in the price of oil...the futures market needs more regulation to limit speculators from screwing us (again)

---

Markets are flawless in their ability to stabilize prices on the long run. Does US consumption based on speculation have the ability to bring the fuel increase on its own? NO!

There are too many factors at work to label 1. US dollar debasement, turmoil in the region of the world where the majority of oil production occurs, and of course oil speculation that feeds of the two other factors.

When the US dollar is down, you are going to have volatility in many commodities, more so oil because it is only sold in dollars ( > 95%). Since food throughout the US is shipped using oil energy (the majority) prices are going to go up.

Quote:

---

Testimony of
Michael W. Masters
Managing Member / Portfolio Manager
Masters Capital Management, LLC
before the
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
United States Senate

May 20, 2008

Good morning and thank you, Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, for the
invitation to speak to you today. This is a topic that I care deeply about, and I
appreciate the chance to share what I have discovered.

I have been successfully managing a long-short equity hedge fund for over 12 years
and I have extensive contacts on Wall Street and within the hedge fund community. Itʼs
important that you know that I am not currently involved in trading the commodities
futures markets. I am not representing any corporate, financial, or lobby organizations. I
am speaking with you today as a concerned citizen whose professional background has
given me insight into a situation that I believe is negatively affecting the U.S. economy.
While some in my profession might be disappointed that I am presenting this testimony
to Congress, I feel that it is the right thing to do.

You have asked the question â??Are Institutional Investors contributing to food and energy price inflation?â?�
And my unequivocal answer is â??YES.â?� In this testimony I will explain that Institutional Investors are one of,
if not the primary, factors affecting commodities prices today. Clearly, there are many factors that contribute
to price determination in the commodities markets; I am here to expose a fast-growing yet virtually unnoticed
factor, and one that presents a problem that can be expediently corrected through legislative policy action.

Commodities prices have increased more in the aggregate over the last five years than
at any other time in U.S. history.

We have seen commodity price spikes occur in the
past as a result of supply crises, such as during the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo. But today,
unlike previous episodes, supply is ample: there are no lines at the gas pump and there
is plenty of food on the shelves.

If supply is adequate - as has been shown by others who have testified before this
committee - and prices are still rising, then demand must be increasing. But how do
you explain a continuing increase in demand when commodity prices have doubled or
tripled in the last 5 years?

What we are experiencing is a demand shock coming from a new category of
participant in the commodities futures markets: Institutional Investors. Specifically,
these are Corporate and Government Pension Funds, Sovereign Wealth Funds,
University Endowments and other Institutional Investors. Collectively, these investors
now account on average for a larger share of outstanding commodities futures contracts
than any other market participant.

These parties, who I call Index Speculators, allocate a portion of their portfolios to
â??investmentsâ?� in the commodities futures market, and behave very differently from the
traditional speculators that have always existed in this marketplace. I refer to them as
â??Indexâ?� Speculators because of their investing strategy: they distribute their
allocation of dollars across the 25 key commodities futures according to the popular indices â?? the
Standard & Poors - Goldman Sachs Commodity Index and the Dow Jones - AIG
Commodity Index.

*snip*

---

The rest is needed to further evaluate what the man is saying; i keep getting an error. Of course, when you add more overall dollars to an economy, the cost of goods will go up until correction takes place.

Quote:

---

some familiar names there...where have i heard of them before????

read more here:
hsgac.senate.gov/public/_files/052008Masters.pdf

---

What is inflation?

sorry about the bad link GB...i'll post the rest of his written testimony below...here is a link to his spoken testimony:
YouTube - Hearing on Energy Speculation, Gas Prices: Masters Testimony


continuation of written testimony (charts available at link):

http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/_files/052008Masters.pdf

Index Speculator Demand Is Driving Prices Higher
Today, Index Speculators are pouring billions of dollars into the commodities futures
markets, speculating that commodity prices will increase. Chart One shows Assets
allocated to commodity index trading strategies have risen from $13 billion at the end of
2003 to $260 billion as of March 2008,
and the prices of the 25 commodities that
compose these indices have risen by an average of 183% in those five years!

According to the CFTC and spot market participants, commodities futures prices are the
benchmark for the prices of actual physical commodities, so when Index Speculators
drive futures prices higher, the effects are felt immediately in spot prices and the real
economy.

So there is a direct link between commodities futures prices and the prices
your constituents are paying for essential goods.
The next table looks at the commodity purchases that Index Speculators have made via
the futures markets. These are huge numbers and they need to be put in perspective to
be fully grasped.
In the popular press the explanation given most often for rising oil prices is the
increased demand for oil from China. According to the DOE, annual Chinese demand
for petroleum has increased over the last five years from 1.88 billion barrels to 2.8 billion
barrels, an increase of 920 million barrels.
Over the same five-year period, Index
Speculatorsʼ demand for petroleum futures has increased by 848 million barrels.
The
increase in demand from Index Speculators is almost equal to the increase in demand
from China!

In fact, Index Speculators have now stockpiled, via the futures market, the equivalent of
1.1 billion barrels of petroleum, effectively adding eight times as much oil to their own
stockpile as the United States has added to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve over the
last five years.

Letâ??s turn our attention to food prices, which have skyrocketed in the last six months.
When asked to explain this dramatic increase, economistsâ?? replies typically focus on the
diversion of a significant portion of the U.S. corn crop to ethanol production.

What
they overlook is the fact that Institutional Investors have purchased over 2 billion
bushels of corn futures in the last five years. Right now, Index Speculators have
stockpiled enough corn futures to potentially fuel the entire United States ethanol
industry at full capacity for a year.
Thatâ??s equivalent to producing 5.3 billion gallons of
ethanol, which would make America the worldâ??s largest ethanol producer.
Turning to Wheat, in 2007 Americans consumed 2.22 bushels of Wheat per capita.

At
1.3 billion bushels, the current Wheat futures stockpile of Index Speculators is enough
to supply every American citizen with all the bread, pasta and baked goods they can eat
for the next two years!

Index Speculator Demand Characteristics
Demand for futures contracts can only come from two sources: Physical Commodity
Consumers and Speculators. Speculators include the Traditional Speculators who have
always existed in the market, as well as Index Speculators. Five years ago, Index
Speculators were a tiny fraction of the commodities futures markets. Today, in many
commodities futures markets, they are the single largest force.

The huge growth in
their demand has gone virtually undetected by classically-trained economists who
almost never analyze demand in futures markets.
Index Speculator demand is distinctly different from Traditional Speculator demand; it
arises purely from portfolio allocation decisions. When an Institutional Investor decides
to allocate 2% to commodities futures, for example, they come to the market with a set
amount of money. They are not concerned with the price per unit; they will buy as many
futures contracts as they need, at whatever price is necessary, until all of their money
has been â??put to work.â?� Their insensitivity to price multiplies their impact on commodity
markets.

Furthermore, commodities futures markets are much smaller than the capital markets,
so multi-billion-dollar allocations to commodities markets will have a far greater impact
on prices. In 2004, the total value of futures contracts outstanding for all 25 index
commodities amounted to only about $180 billion.

Compare that with worldwide
equity markets which totaled $44 trillion
, or over 240 times bigger. That year, Index
Speculators poured $25 billion into these markets, an amount equivalent to 14% of the
total market.

One particularly troubling aspect of Index Speculator demand is that it actually
increases the more prices increase. This explains the accelerating rate at which
commodity futures prices (and actual commodity prices) are increasing. Rising prices
attract more Index Speculators, whose tendency is to increase their allocation as prices
rise. So their profit-motivated demand for futures is the inverse of what you would
expect from price-sensitive consumer behavior.

You can see from Chart Two that prices have increased the most dramatically in the first
quarter of 2008. We calculate that Index Speculators flooded the markets with $55
billion in just the first 52 trading days of this year.

Thatâ??s an increase in the dollar
value of outstanding futures contracts of more than $1 billion per trading day. Doesnâ??t it
seem likely that an increase in demand of this magnitude in the commodities futures
markets could go a long way in explaining the extraordinary commodities price
increases in the beginning of 2008?

There is a crucial distinction between Traditional Speculators and Index Speculators:
Traditional Speculators provide liquidity by both buying and selling futures. Index
Speculators buy futures and then roll their positions by buying calendar spreads. They
never sell. Therefore, they consume liquidity and provide zero benefit to the futures
markets.

It is easy to see now that traditional policy measures will not work to correct the problem
created by Index Speculators, whose allocation decisions are made with little regard for
the supply and demand fundamentals in the physical commodity markets. If OPEC
supplies the markets with more oil, it will have little affect on Index Speculator demand
for oil futures. If Americans reduce their demand through conservation measures like
carpooling and using public transportation, it will have little affect on Institutional

Investor demand for commodities futures.
Index Speculatorsâ?? trading strategies amount to virtual hoarding via the commodities
futures markets. Institutional Investors are buying up essential items that exist in limited
quantities for the sole purpose of reaping speculative profits.

Think about it this way: If Wall Street concocted a scheme whereby investors bought
large amounts of pharmaceutical drugs and medical devices in order to profit from the
resulting increase in prices, making these essential items unaffordable to sick and dying
people, society would be justly outraged.
Why is there not outrage over the fact that Americans must pay drastically more to feed
their families, fuel their cars, and heat their homes?

Index Speculators provide no benefit to the futures markets and they inflict a
tremendous cost upon society. Individually, these participants are not acting with
malicious intent; collectively, however, their impact reaches into the wallets of every
American consumer.

Is it necessary for the U.S. economy to suffer through yet another financial crisis
created by new investment techniques, the consequences of which have once again
been unforeseen by their Wall Street proponents?

The CFTC Has Invited Increased Speculation
When Congress passed the Commodity Exchange Act in 1936, they did so with the
understanding that speculators should not be allowed to dominate the commodities
futures markets. Unfortunately, the CFTC has taken deliberate steps to allow certain
speculators virtually unlimited access to the commodities futures markets.
The CFTC has granted Wall Street banks an exemption from speculative position limits
when these banks hedge over-the-counter swaps transactions.

This has effectively
opened a loophole for unlimited speculation. When Index Speculators enter into
commodity index swaps, which 85-90% of them do, they face no speculative position
limits.

The really shocking thing about the Swaps Loophole is that Speculators of all stripes
can use it to access the futures markets. So if a hedge fund wants a $500 million
position in Wheat, which is way beyond position limits, they can enter into swap with a
Wall Street bank and then the bank buys $500 million worth of Wheat futures.

In the CFTCâ??s classification scheme all Speculators accessing the futures markets
through the Swaps Loophole are categorized as â??Commercialâ?� rather than â??Non-
Commercial.â?� The result is a gross distortion in data that effectively hides the full impact
of Index Speculation.
Additionally, the CFTC has recently proposed that Index Speculators be exempt from all
position limits, thereby throwing the door open for unlimited Index Speculator
â??investment.â?�

The CFTC has even gone so far as to issue press releases on their
website touting studies they commissioned showing that commodities futures make
good additions to Institutional Investorsâ?? portfolios.
Is this what Congress expected when it created the CFTC?
Congress Should Eliminate The Practice Of Index Speculation
I would like to conclude my testimony today by outlining three steps that can be taken to immediately reduce Index Speculation.

Number One:
Congress has closely regulated pension funds, recognizing that they serve a public
purpose. Congress should modify ERISA regulations to prohibit commodity index
replication strategies as unsuitable pension investments because of the damage that
they do to the commodities futures markets and to Americans as a whole.

Number Two:
Congress should act immediately to close the Swaps Loophole. Speculative position
limits must â??look-throughâ?� the swaps transaction to the ultimate counterparty and hold
that counterparty to the speculative position limits. This would curtail Index Speculation
and it would force ALL Speculators to face position limits.

Number Three:
Congress should further compel the CFTC to reclassify all the positions in the
Commercial category of the Commitments of Traders Reports to distinguish those
positions that are controlled by â??Bona Fideâ?� Physical Hedgers from those controlled by
Wall Street banks. The positions of Wall Street banks should be further broken down
based on their OTC swaps counter-party into â??Bona Fideâ?� Physical Hedgers and
Speculators.

There are hundreds of billions of investment dollars poised to enter the commodities
futures markets at this very moment.
If immediate action is not taken, food and
energy prices will rise higher still. This could have catastrophic economic effects on
millions of already stressed U.S. consumers. It literally could mean starvation for
millions of the worldâ??s poor.

If Congress takes these steps, the structural integrity of the futures markets will be
restored. Index Speculator demand will be virtually eliminated and it is likely that food
and energy prices will come down sharply.

"What is inflation? "

- that depends on what the definition of "is" is

ha ha?

you're joking, right?

Gee I post a bit of "Humor" and some of ya'll take it SOOOOOO seriously!!! Geez can't ya'll Consertives ever laugh at yourselves??/ Gawd....No Sense of humor!!