President Bush Defends Rapist-Murderer To Appease Mexico

President Bush Defends Rapist-Murderer To Appease Mexico [align=left] Chuck Baldwin
Tuesday October 16, 2007[/align]
It seems President George W. Bush will stop at no lengths to appease Mexico and place the United States under international authority. His latest fiasco, however, twists logic, mocks justice, and defies decency.
I am referring to the fact that President Bush is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the death penalty of an illegal Mexican alien convicted of brutally raping and murdering two Houston, Texas teenagers back in 1993. (I wrote about this case already. See When Do Bad Policies Become Treasonous? )
Here is Word Net Daily's (WND) latest report of the story: "At issue is the death penalty verdict for Jose Medellin, who confessed in 1993 to participating in the rape and murder of two Houston teenagers. Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena were sodomized and strangled with their shoe laces. Medellin then boasted of keeping one girl's Mickey Mouse watch as a souvenir of the crime.
"The Bush administration is before the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to overturn the death penalty, at the behest of the International Court of Justice, a division of the United Nations.
(Article continues below)


"Medellin and four others were convicted of capital murder and sent to Texas' death row. A juvenile court sentenced Medellin's younger brother, who was 14 at the time, to 40 years in prison."
(See the full WND report at WorldNetDaily: Outrage erupts over Bush demands in murder case )
Why, you ask, would President Bush appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of an illegal alien who murdered two American teenagers? According to administration officials, it is because "the Texas court [that convicted and sentenced Medellin] is undermining the president's efforts to conduct foreign policy."
You read it right. President Bush is defending a rapist-murderer, because the man is an illegal alien and, therefore, should be turned over to the authority of a UN "world court." And, according to Bush, for the State of Texas to refuse to do so undermines the President's efforts to conduct foreign policy.
One has to wonder: just what kind of foreign policy does President Bush want to conduct? Apparently, Bush's foreign policy determines that it is more important to appease the Mexican government than see justice done for two American families who had their teenage daughters raped and murdered by an illegal alien from Mexico.
Remember, this is from a President who, when he was Governor of Texas, signed more than 150 death warrants. This is the same man who mocked condemned prisoner Karla Faye Tucker after she had accepted the Lord Jesus Christ as her personal Savior and had appealed to Bush for clemency. In fact, George W. Bush just might be the only chief executive in American history to publicly mock someone who was about to die.
See I Would Spare Karla Faye Tucker
See also http://www.geocities.com/rainforest/...karlamain.html
See also Death in Texas - The New York Review of Books
In his autobiography, "A Charge To Keep," G.W. Bush addressed the subject of granting clemencies for people convicted of capital crimes. He said that it was not his job "to replace the verdict of a jury unless there are new facts or evidence of which a jury was unaware, or evidence that the trial was somehow unfair." He has now obviously forgotten this principle.
Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz is arguing on behalf of the state court and its death penalty. He called Bush's actions "breathtaking." He told the Houston Chronicle, "It is emphatically not the province of the president to say what the law is. If this president's assertion of authority is upheld in this case, it opens the door for enormous mischief from presidents of either party. What might these presidents be inclined to do if they had the power to flick state laws off the books?"
According to WND, Alliance Defense Fund Chief Counsel Benjamin Bull said he expected justices Souter, Stevens, Breyer, and Ginsburg to side with President Bush. For example, when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was General Counsel with the ACLU, she wrote a law review article "advocating that American foreign policy be under the United Nations." According to Bull, the Medellin case "is manna from heaven" for Ginsburg.
The Medellin case might be manna from heaven for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, but it is rotten potatoes for the American people. And President Bush is the cook in the kitchen serving up this garbage.
Is it any wonder that former Mexican President Vicente Fox told Larry King Live last Tuesday evening that he and President Bush had agreed to "create a new regional currency in the Americas." (See the story at WorldNetDaily: Ex-Mexican prez: 'Amero' on the way )
Fox was asked by a listener what he felt about the possibility of having a Latin America united with one currency. According to the CNN transcript obtained by WND, "Fox answered in the affirmative, indicating it was a long-term plan. He admitted he and President Bush had agreed to pursue the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas--a free trade zone extending throughout the Western Hemisphere, suggesting part of the plan was to institute eventually a regional currency."
Is there anyone who cannot see what Bush is doing? He has committed the United States to a trilateral, hemispheric government in which each of the three nations--the U.S., Mexico, and Canada--are united under one regional authority. This is why President Bush demonstrates such stubborn resistance to any plan that would attempt to keep the United States independent of this newly formed regional authority.
Because of Bush's plan to merge the U.S. into a North American Community, he is determined to grant illegal aliens amnesty, and he is willing to demand that illegal aliens who rape and murder American citizens must be turned over to a "world court."
It is time the American people face the reality that President Bush is deliberately and intentionally sacrificing America's sovereignty and independence in order to fulfill his elitist plans for global unification. If our congressmen and senators had any real courage, they would impeach this man and his Vice President for treason.
The sad reality is, however, many of our congressmen and senators are just as guilty as Bush and Cheney. Furthermore, if the American people themselves would break away from "American Idol" and their favorite college football games long enough to see what was really happening in this country, we would not have these bozos in Congress to begin with.
America's biggest threat is not from al Qaeda; it is from these conniving internationalists in Washington, D.C. An al Qaeda terrorist can possibly knock down a building or bridge and kill a few of us, but these traitors (from both major parties) in Washington have the power to enslave the whole country--and that is exactly what they are in the process of doing.
So, in the name of "conducting foreign policy," President George W. Bush is doggedly defending a Mexican rapist-murderer. However, what he is really doing is working to appease his elitist Mexican counterparts so they together can implement their New World Order agenda. I don't know about anyone else, but it makes me want to puke!

Howdy pisshead,

I tell ya what-President Bush is sure pissin in his cornflakes to support the ICJ over the sovereignty of Texas and America ! :mad:

Now do you see why I think that it's time that States start talking about seccession ? If for no other reason than to send shockwaves through the feds.

I'm totally against Bush on this one. :mad:

Have a good one ...

hey torog whats up?

well another fine mess aye? well i have to say that this guy deserves what he gets. but we entered a treaty with the UN on iternational affairs and according to that this guy was not given due process and his rights were violated. now this is according to this treaty. in my personal opinion screw his rights he raped and murdred two teenage girls. but we still have to honor a treaty. if this was an american in say turkish prison could you imagine how much hell would be raised over the exacution. also from what i seen in the news on this the UN wants a retrial not clemancy. remember a few years ago when that kid was sentanced to caining for vandalism? i cant remember exact details but it came down to the fact his rights were not violated under the UN agreement he was given due process and guess what he got the crap beat outa him with a cain. i am not for given this guy clemancy but we have to honor the agreement we maid or we cant complain when the shoe is on the other foot. like i said in my oppinion this guy sould be soddomized in his cell and strangled with his shoestring rather than a nice painless lethal injection. in my oppinion also the real terroists ( thats what i call the media) are yet again spinning things and only telling half truths. of course the "liberal bush hating" media is goin to make it look like bush wants to turn a sick preverted killer loose on the streets of america.

it makes me almost embarressed to call myself a liberal now a days

The Bush administration became involved in the Medellin case in 2003 when Mexico sued the U.S. over the consular issue in the International Court of Justice at The Hague. The so-called "World Court" is the United Nations' top court for resolving international disputes.

The court ruled in Mexico's favor in late 2004 and ordered the United States to reconsider the Mexican inmates' murder convictions and death sentences. In February 2005, Bush announced that while he disagreed with the World Court's decision, the U.S. would comply, and he declared how: He would order courts in Texas and elsewhere to review the cases.
Houston killer's case raises constitutional issue | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle

IF Bush didn't do this these people would be printing a story on how Bush is ignoring the World Court and denying this individual of his rights. This son of a bitch should hang and he sure shouldn't have his own website!!
Jose Medellin - Texas Death Row

I believe that would be the state of Texas allowing that one.:mad:

Have a good one!:s4:

i stand corrected . i maynot be a supporter of the bush admin. but i find it totaly embarrising the way the liberal media portrays the man. i am a liberal at heart. and i find it a sad state of affairs the way the so-called-liberals attack him on every issue. even this last SCHIP thing. i was totlaly against that, mainly because the money would come from another cigarette tax. but the spin that was put on it was ridiculous.
i can honestly say i was just goin by what i heard on the news recently because this whole story is new to me, with the exception of the crime and the arrest. i did not know about the previos rulings.

its my beleif that the media has and is doin more damage to our country than any terror organzaion could ever do

There's a liberal media?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Torog

Howdy pisshead,

I tell ya what-President Bush is sure pissin in his cornflakes to support the ICJ over the sovereignty of Texas and America ! :mad:

Now do you see why I think that it's time that States start talking about seccession ? If for no other reason than to send shockwaves through the feds.

I'm totally against Bush on this one. :mad:

Have a good one ...

---

Damn, I finally agree with you on something. :thumbsup:

Constitutionally, the States have the power to tell the federal gov't to screw off. It's a pity that none of our state politicians have the intestinal fortitude to stand up for our rights.

PC :smokin:

Sure, ignore the international community on issues like going to war, or having secret torture prisons... but when it comes to saving the poor rapist/murdurer, suddenly the US drops it's John Wayne "My way or the highway" attitude.

International community? LOL..you must mean the U.N. I agree with ya though, we should play "The Duke" one more time.:thumbsup:

Have a good one!:s4:

Howdy Y'all,

Well dang..I reckon that pisshead is so shocked that I agreed with him for once,that he don't know what to say..lol.

I realize that Bush is stuck between a rock and a hard spot on this,I just think that it's time for the States to grow a spine and stop letting the feds(and the international comunity) trample all over em. :mad:

Have a good one ...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jakez

There's a liberal media?

---

Yeah. It's called 'High Times'.