Printable View
Simple enough question, I'm just curious as to most women's asthetic preferrence. Lets not turn this into a circumethics debate please, somehow those get even angrier than the religious and political ones:wtf:.
We're also assuming that cleanliness isn't an issue. That's gotta be one of the biggest bullshit myths that uncut guys are "unclean". I'm not cut and I keep everything 100% clean all the time, it really takes no effort to wash it with everything else.
So my good stoner chicks, opinions?
I worry a heck of a lot more about the person behind the penis, frankly. If I were single, I'd be choosing according to the guy and not whether or not he's been cut. My husband is circumcized because that was the fashion when he was born. We elected not to circumcize our son. I don't know any ladies who choose for or against a guy based on circumcision. If any of them do, I don't think that speaks well of those ladies.
Damnit! I forgot the "doesn't matter either way" option. Ah well....
You're quite right birdgirl, but I've seriously heard girls say "EEWWW! That's so gross if they're not cut, I'd never touch that!" :rolleyes:
I figure you circumcised guys must be in the US, because everywhere here doctors won't do it to babies, and even in the UK it's not covered by the Health.
So if you're from anywhere from Spain to Korea, and circumcised, you're bound to get a lot of questions...
One of my friends from the US came to visit me, and he said that they all thought it was cool, only that the ones who thought it was cool weren't females.
Not all females think it's cool. It's just that they've been fooled by our foreskin-unfriendly American culture into thinking that circumcized is the only proper way for a guy to look. I'd be much more apt, if it were a matter of choice based on the penis alone instead of the person, to choose an unadulterated, uncircumcized guy because that's the way he's really meant to be, with all those nerve endings intact for his pleasure and mine.
Who says "looks" are the sole reason behind the practice? If I took that approach towards women, keeping it natural as it were, how would it look upon me to label others as fools just because they prefer artificially augmented ears, noses, chins, lips, cheeks,... ?Quote:
It's just that they've been fooled by our foreskin-unfriendly American culture into thinking that circumcized is the only proper way for a guy to look.
Which is why I agree with your previous statement of the guy behind the tool being vastly more important in an adult relationship than the tool itself.
I guess I just don't share the view of nature, and by proxy the human anatomy, being absolutely perfect in every way. The way I see it, if our eyes, knees, and backs have design flaws then I don't see why a penis can't.
Nature saw fit to give the majority of us wisdom teeth, yet we remove them to make our lives easier all the time. That's not fashion, that's pragmatism.
I thought women liked uncircumcised cuz it FELT better. has nothing to do with 'looks' or 'aesthetic appearance'.
what actually matters anyway is how it feels and not just how it looks.
You need to read what I wrote again. Twice, if necessary. I didn't by any means say looks were the reason behind the practice of circumcision itself. Nor did anyone else. You might want to revisit the suject of this poll, too, so you can see how my statement followed that.Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueDevil
I said looks, because they're what women have seen most often in pictures and American culture, are what are likely behind many women's preference for circumcized men as romantic partners.
There's a big difference my statement and your misinterpretation of it. BIG.
I'm not cut and girls usually compliment me on my penis' looks and hygiene.
Certain "expierenced" girls have told me that they prefer a circumcized penis because some guy's foreskin isn't as clean as mine.. then again, girls have told me my penis is normal looking and that there are very nasty looking penises...cut or not.
i think it's all about your hygiene.
I'm surprised by the lack of female respondants to the poll...:wtf:
^lol i guess it's taboo..
It's also true that once an un-circumcized penis has a lot of un-protected sex, the foreskin stays down and it's barely noticeable.
At least that's what happend to me....I can't speak for anyone else though.. lol
bah, enough dick talk for me....haha
Personally, I like uncircumcised solely because I'm used to it. I've been with both cut and uncut and honestly (only one uncut), it doesn't bother me either way, but if I HAD to choose, I guess I'd pick cut. Like others have said though, in the long run that really DOESN'T matter, obviously the person comes before looks and uh, the penis. :P
In the UK it IS covered by the NHS - and it's a very regular thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by maik
Quote:
You need to read what I wrote again. Twice, if necessary. I didn't by any means say looks were the reason behind the practice of circumcision itself.
I provided the relevant parts of your post that I was addressing, so please don't try to make this sound like I'm attempting to put words in your mouth - or anyone else's for that matter.
But the fact is you completely avoided mentioning any and all justification for the procedure, and instead went straight to calling people 'fooled' over what according to your post is a mainly a fashion issue. Or, did you infer 'fool' in a nicer, less condescending way? I'm glad to hear your clarification though, that's what I was hoping for.
Unnecessary. My mentioning of health concerns is every bit as valid as you mentioning your take on this as a parent. As in, they're the same for the sake of argument in that both angles have nothing to do with the preference of a sex partner. Can you see how my statements follow now?Quote:
You might want to revisit the suject of this poll, too, so you can see how my statement followed that.
I figured you were focusing on that aspect for the obvious reasons; what puzzled me was your mentioning of the other valid scenario, that of a parent's choice (decidedly un-romantic!) in relation the child's health. If health is therefor a concern, all I'm saying is let's cite that supporting rational instead of cutting straight to labeling others as being duped by some unnecessary cultural fad.Quote:
I said looks, because they're what women have seen most often in pictures and American culture, are what are likely behind many women's preference for circumcized men as romantic partners.
Is it really that much to ask?
Quote:
There's a big difference my statement and your misinterpretation of it. BIG.
Speaking of misinterpretation...
AGAIN, I didn't form a conclusion from your statements, I submitted a question to you in regards to your rather lop-sided comment(s) in hopes of clarification. Perhaps you should read what I wrote again. Twice, if necessary.
Disclaimer: I'm not trying to start a fight with you birdie, and have absolutely no problems with you or your personal feelings on circumcision. But I think your take on this lacks some of the objectivity and detail I've come to equate with your username. Please try not to be offended if I attempt to get you to elaborate your sentiments.
wow you need to chill out and smoke one :jointsmile:
LOL! And I'd recommend you smoking less if you really think I'm worked up over this. If I were anymore chill I'd be asleep.Quote:
wow you need to chill out and smoke one
Thanks for the concern though! :thumbsup:
Read your PM from me, Blue Devil. We need to let Gandalf's thread proceed and be answered by women, as it was intended, and to remain free of debate about circumcision, as he asked.
if its uncircumcised keep it clean. its fucking gross when it smells.
bloody hell these are very interesting results, wouyld be nice if we could break them down by location. I never imagined 50% of guys were circumcised and there is not one single female vote for uncut!
PS: If your circumcised that must make having a bash a bit uncumfy!
Personally I prefer a cut penis simply because that's the norm I know. I've almost been with one uncut guy, and it was gross because his foreskin hygeine was lacking (hence the almost LOL...his ass had to hit the curb with that stinky winky). I've assisted doctors in curcumcising infants and adults, and if you're gonna have it done, it's better to be done at 3 days old than at 30. Every man I know that's had to have adult circ has been absolutely miserable with it...women have less trouble giving birth....sorry I'm a little off topic...
How many adult males have to get circumcision though?
For the ladies,
just think of an uncircumcised cock as TASTY like a bagel dog
[attachment=o157577]
or CUTE like a turtle in it's shell
[attachment=o157578]
More than you'd think....there's a few medical conditions that require it...the most common reason I've seen is a condition called phimosis, which is a hardening and narrowing of the foreskin behind the glans (head) which if left untreated will cut off blood supply to the glans. When I was in nursing school, the first 4 obervations during my surgical rotation were circumcisions....blew my little innocent mind...Quote:
Originally Posted by Snorbel
Of course it's smelly if you don't wash it.. who in their right mind wouldn't wash their genitals????
If I had to guess, it's prolly the same smell as smelly, dirty vaginas...
fucking gross... i'm shuttering just thinking about it.
My grandfather got it after some years.. He's fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Snorbel
I don't see the need for me to do it though.
it isn't nasty, it's clean, and you can barely notice..
I could, I don't see a reason to..
maybe if my wife wants me to one day.....or something like that.
im planning on circum. my son though, if i ever have one.
unbeleivable that no women chose the natural state. i myself, being in the US, have run accross few that were in the natural state. is kinda funny that the procedure was started by a god and now most (?) of the US has it done most (?) often. i know some men in the UK and they are appalled that it happens all the time here. wonder how many posts will be done now that i bring up a god?
fuck a cicum-ANYTHING BRO!! 7 3/4s uncut, california stick. but to a certain extent it really is about how u use it, ive seen guys who were hung that could not sling very skillfully.
but too get back on topic, i feel sorry for guys who are cut. thats a sensitive area what if somethin nicked ur tip?? oh yeah and guys who are uncut have 40% more sensitivity...i mean when a girl is givin me head and polishes the knob w/skill, sometimes i just cant take the SENSATION; meaning it totally tickles. anyone who is rank irregarless of cut or un cut, thats bc u r a MF scrub bro, ditch the dread locks and groom yourself!! naw jk. seriously though ive had plenty of females tell me it looks cool. plus it feels nice to pull that shit down. *checks package*
Donny