Giuliani Hammers Democrats on Terrorism

NEW CASTLE, N.H. -- Rudolph Giuliani refused to relent Wednesday morning in what has become a regular assault on Democrats, particularly their commitment to and understanding of the terrorist threat against America.

At a town hall meeting in New Castle, Giuliani flatly accused Democrats of "ignoring terrorism." As an example, he said there had been no mention at the Democratic debate Sunday of the recent foiled terrorist plots in New Jersey and at JFK airport.

"I believe they don't want to talk about it because they want to make sure that President Bush doesn't get credit for anything," he told the crowd of about 150 at a meeting hall outside of Portsmouth.

Later, he criticized the leading Democratic presidential candidates by name, deriding them as backward-looking politicians and predicted any of the three would raise taxes if elected president.

"It's like a car. Our car is moving forward. Our car is trying to go to a destination called the future. Here is what Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards want to do. They want to take that car and put it in reverse...They want to go back to the golden age of the 1990s."

He added, sarcastically, "Oh, things were great in the 1990s. Your taxes were 24-25 percent higher. Would you like that to happen again? Do you want to pay 24-25 percent more to messed up Washington? Do you want to do that? Then you better not vote for a Democrat."

Giuliani's comments were a continuation of a theme he tried to establish in Tuesday night's GOP debate. In one of his first answers to CNN host Wolf Blitzer, Giuliani heaped criticism on Democrats for their foreign policy positions.

"The problem the Democrats make is they're in denial," the former New York mayor said during the debate. "That's why you hear things like you heard in the debate the other night, that, you know, Iran really isn't dangerous; it's 10 years away from nuclear weapons."
Giuliani Hammers Democrats on Terrorism - Campaign Trail

"Rudy Can't Fail"..........

Have a good one!:s4:

haha did you watch that republican thing, when Giuliani spoke about abortion the set was struck by lightning haha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rebgirl420

haha did you watch that republican thing, when Giuliani spoke about abortion the set was struck by lightning haha

---

That was CLASSIC! All the others backed off from Rudy in fear of a lightning hit. LOL

Have a good one!:s4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rebgirl420

haha did you watch that republican thing, when Giuliani spoke about abortion the set was struck by lightning haha

---

Howdy rebgirl420,

Well I'll be ! I ain't heard no tell of that there lightening strike ! Maybe Rudy's beliefs about abortion,pissed God off..after all,doesn't he believe that it's a personal choice for a woman to decide whether or not she wants to murder her child ? That God has no part in that choice ? That in such a situation,the woman temporarily becomes God,jury,judge and executioner ? How can any man or woman,tell God to step aside while they murder God's child ? Maybe God was sending us a message,that we best choose a leader who won't condone and support,the wave of baby killing that's been going on since 1973 and has resulted in the murders of over 40 million children.. ?

Have a good one ...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud

That was CLASSIC! All the others backed off from Rudy in fear of a lightning hit. LOL
Have a good one!

---

"It's like a car. Our car is moving forward. Our car is trying to go to a destination called the future. Here is what Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards want to do. They want to take that car and put it in reverse...They want to go back to the golden age of the 1990s."

I like that quote!

Below: click to see a guy doing the right thing

rudy giuliani is such a fucking crook...who in their right mind would exploit 9/11 for their own political benefit...oh yeah, him. fuck him. he'd let another attack happen if he could just to run for president again after he loses.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Markass

rudy giuliani is such a fucking crook...who in their right mind would exploit 9/11 for their own political benefit...oh yeah, him. fuck him. he'd let another attack happen if he could just to run for president again after he loses.

---

Political benefit or just benefit? I can name a few like M. Moore and A. Jones to start off with.

Have a good one!:s4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud

Political benefit or just benefit? I can name a few like M. Moore and A. Jones to start off with.

Have a good one!:s4:

---

he's running for president now isn't he? how much money did he have before? it wasn't multi millions like it is now for his campaign, that's for damn sure. that sure sounds like political benefit to me...right now we've got an ignorant selfish prick in the white house, we don't need a lying thieving bastard next.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Markass

he's running for president now isn't he? how much money did he have before? it wasn't multi millions like it is now for his campaign, that's for damn sure. that sure sounds like political benefit to me...right now we've got an ignorant selfish prick in the white house, we don't need a lying thieving bastard next.

---

Exploitation for personal gain is just that no matter what the venue. These others that I've mentioned have filled thier pockets off the same subject.

Rudy is playing the part of a typical politician. We all KNOW that 99% of politicians are crooks so this should come as no big suprise. Personally, I expect more out of journalists than I do politicians.

Have a good one!:s4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud

Exploitation for personal gain is just that no matter what the venue. These others that I've mentioned have filled thier pockets off the same subject.

Rudy is playing the part of a typical politician. We all KNOW that 99% of politicians are crooks so this should come as no big suprise. Personally, I expect more out of journalists than I do politicians.

Have a good one!:s4:

---

scraping millions upon millions of dollars up from the deadliest attack on US soil is typical? yeah, right...maybe for bush's administration, but that's not what american democracy is. I can distinctly remember american government and our government functions nothing like I've learned.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Markass

I can distinctly remember american government and our government functions nothing like I've learned.

---

welcome to the real world. it ain't as tidy here as it is on paper, is it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Markass

scraping millions upon millions of dollars up from the deadliest attack on US soil is typical? yeah, right....

---

What about all them dems that ran on a anti-Iraq war platform and then voted for a pro-surge general? Hell, even Hillary is running as the 9-11 senator from New York.....watch the debates, she ALWAYS manages to slide that statement in.

Have a good one!:s4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud

What about all them dems that ran on a anti-Iraq war platform and then voted for a pro-surge general? Hell, even Hillary is running as the 9-11 senator from New York.....watch the debates, she ALWAYS manages to slide that statement in.

Have a good one!:s4:

---

you can't compare any of that to what rudy did...there's a point where you should not go past..and he certainly went past it..I'll be 18 in 6 days, and if his name is on the ballot when I go to vote, well I guesss I wouldn't vote republican anyhow, but he would never get my vote, and based on the article that I read in rolling stone about him and that article only. that's not the type of person I want running the country I live in.

honestly though as far as my political feeling...I want a president who's going to allow a federal policy change on medical marijuana, and that's who gets my vote. our country's already fucked up enough, and nobody could do a worse job at management than george bush..except for maybe rudy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Markass

honestly though as far as my political feeling...I want a president who's going to allow a federal policy change on medical marijuana, and that's who gets my vote.

---

MUCH RESPECT for ya!!:thumbsup: Alot of people would just turn off from the system as it exists. VERY glad to see you'll be there with a vote. Even if you know that your going for an "underdog" at least your making the statement. We won't ever see change unless everyone gets involved.

Have a good one!:s4:

Juliani is a scumbag. MARIJUANA ARRESTS WENT UP 1,000% when he took over as mayor. All you right wingnuts beware, he'll ramp up the war on drugs for sure. That might be the only good to come out of the Bush regime, they put the war on drugs on the back burner. I wouldn't vote for that asshole if he were handing out 1,000 dollar bills.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by medicinal

Juliani is a scumbag. MARIJUANA ARRESTS WENT UP 1,000% when he took over as mayor. All you right wingnuts beware, he'll ramp up the war on drugs for sure. That might be the only good to come out of the Bush regime, they put the war on drugs on the back burner. I wouldn't vote for that asshole if he were handing out 1,000 dollar bills.

---

I'm glad he got rid of the street-types that plagued many parts of the city, who were selling beat stuff and often just outright ripping people off, sometimes violently.

Most marijuana possession arrests in NYC were for using it in public view, a misdemeanor, and usually nothing comes of it beyond a fine.

I've lived in NYC during the tenure of seven mayors, and Guiliani was one of the best, if not the best. For a Republican in a Democratic city to get voted in not only once, but twice, that's saying something.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat

I'm glad he got rid of the street-types that plagued many parts of the city, who were selling beat stuff and often just outright ripping people off, sometimes violently.

Most marijuana possession arrests in NYC were for using it in public view, a misdemeanor, and usually nothing comes of it beyond a fine.

I've lived in NYC during the tenure of seven mayors, and Guiliani was one of the best, if not the best. For a Republican in a Democratic city to get voted in not only once, but twice, that's saying something.

---

Say all you will, Juliani is a cross dressing pervert with 3 marriages to his name and a warmongering outlook. If the Republicans elect this loser, I'm looking into panamanian citizenship. You can kiss all your civil rights goodby in the name of the war on terror, the war in Iraq will continue ad-infinitum, and the rich will continue to squeeze the middle class out of existence. One world order will be the order of the day and open borders will prevail. By the time he would be out of office, this would be a third world country. This guy is more like Bush than Bush!

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsZUBpNLGAU[/YOUTUBE]

Have a good one!:s4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by medicinal

You can kiss all your civil rights goodbye in the name of the war on terror, the war in Iraq will continue ad-infinitum, and the rich will continue to squeeze the middle class out of existence. One world order will be the order of the day and open borders will prevail. By the time he would be out of office, this would be a third world country.

---

the dems have a much more humane agenda, don't they.

you can kiss your civil rights and your paycheck goodbye in the name of socialist totalitarianism, as the dems regulate us into oblivion (for our own good, of course). with a host of their patented do nothing social programs, all at the expense of predominantly middle-class taxpayers, we will be expected to save the world while the rich take their cut from the safety of their ivory towers.

hooray, we've pulled out of iraq. now we can sit back and watch the bloodbath as the possibility of an iraqi democracy fades and it becomes just another islamic theocratic state. what's next? will we sit by idly as iran makes good on its threats to obliterate israel? will we welcome the jihadists with open arms next time they decide to protest our foreign policy by blowing up a few thousand more civilians on american soil? i suppose we could attempt to placate them by providing them with the nuclear technology to turn detroit into a glowing wasteland (would anyone notice?).

of course, the borders wouldn't have to be opened. with 20 million brand new citizens (i'd say that's an extremely conservative estimate) straight out of mexico and any other central or south american country that doesn't feel like dealing with its own poor. this has been a major component of the dem play book for years and with their control of the white house and both houses of congress its pretty much a foregone conclusion that we won't have to become a third world country, we'll bring every third world country on earth here and add them to the rolls here in our brand new welfare state.

HELL YEAH! Great post!!:thumbsup:

Have a good one!:s4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by delusionsofNORMALity

the dems have a much more humane agenda, don't they.

you can kiss your civil rights and your paycheck goodbye in the name of socialist totalitarianism, as the dems regulate us into oblivion (for our own good, of course). with a host of their patented do nothing social programs, all at the expense of predominantly middle-class taxpayers, we will be expected to save the world while the rich take their cut from the safety of their ivory towers.

hooray, we've pulled out of iraq. now we can sit back and watch the bloodbath as the possibility of an iraqi democracy fades and it becomes just another islamic theocratic state. what's next? will we sit by idly as iran makes good on its threats to obliterate israel? will we welcome the jihadists with open arms next time they decide to protest our foreign policy by blowing up a few thousand more civilians on american soil? i suppose we could attempt to placate them by providing them with the nuclear technology to turn detroit into a glowing wasteland (would anyone notice?).

of course, the borders wouldn't have to be opened. with 20 million brand new citizens (i'd say that's an extremely conservative estimate) straight out of mexico and any other central or south american country that doesn't feel like dealing with its own poor. this has been a major component of the dem play book for years and with their control of the white house and both houses of congress its pretty much a foregone conclusion that we won't have to become a third world country, we'll bring every third world country on earth here and add them to the rolls here in our brand new welfare state.

---

I'd say that was a little over the top. I'm not exactly a democrat either. I'm an independent, although that doesn't leave a whole lot of choices. If you like the idea of living in a plutocracy then the repubes are your choice, BTW, isn't it Neo-con Dubya that wants this amnesty, isn't it him and his cronies that have been pushing the cheap labor policies in this nation. Don't try and blame it on the Dems, although their complicity abounds, its the elites that will and are benefitting from all these illegal workers. The middle class pay the taxes to support their medical and schooling and welfare, while the elites reap the large tax breaks, curtesy of Dubys and his cronies.

It seems some conservatives like to make arguments simply by flinging around terms like "socialists" and "liberals" as if they're dirty words in and of themselves. Socialist policiies are not proof of an impending totalitarian regime, or the diminishment of rights. ACTION, is proof of these things, when administrations like the current one actually implement such dictatorial policies.

Meanwhile, I'll continue living in evil socialist Canada where average living standards, personal income, and the rich/poor cap are all in better shape than in the states. Something I attribute to moderate socialism and capitalism rather than extremist attitudes that reject one or the other as the tool of the devil.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mrdevious

It seems some conservatives like to make arguments simply by flinging around terms like "socialists" and "liberals" as if they're dirty words in and of themselves.

---

by current standards, to be labeled a liberal is one of the worst insults imaginable. the agenda of the liberal elite has become a quest for the ultimate nanny-state and many life-long liberals are now embarrassed to be associated with such totalitarian ideals. the concepts of progressive political reform have been replaced by these ivory tower fools with a headlong rush toward improbable goals through impossible means. this latest crop of liberal leaders seem to see no point in responding to the desires of their constituents. they are merely a slightly hipper version of their reactionary counterparts from across the aisle.

as for socialism. if properly constrained by a truly democratic political system it is merely another name for communism, one of the most equitable forms of economic distribution ever developed. the problem arises when those in control of the means of production (the state) become so corrupt that they no longer represent the best interests of the population. as a citizen of a country where our representatives have long since ceased to represent their constituents, i see no good end to a socialist trend. `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````````````````

i have no idea what happened at the end of that post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by delusionsofNORMALity

i have no idea what happened at the end of that post.

---

That's a monitor encription code courtesy of the DNC.

Have a good one!:s4:

Nice try. I think he was trying to get the last word. No matter who wins in '08' they'll be better than the current regime. A donkey and an elephant could not do as much harm as these assholes have done. Maybe since we don't seem to have the balls to stop them, after they're out of office, the world court will indite them, and while on vacation in the south of France, Cheney will be renditioned to the Haig. God, I'd die from laughter. Bush goes to visit his bussom buddie Vincente Fox in Mexico and Bam, renditioned to the Haig. Please God, If you are real, let it happen!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by medicinal

Please God, If you are real, let it happen!

---

sorry, god is a republican. why do you think i'm an atheist.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by delusionsofNORMALity

sorry, god is a republican. why do you think i'm an atheist.

---

~LOL~, your probably right.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by delusionsofNORMALity

sorry, god is a republican. why do you think i'm an atheist.

---

In the not-too-distant past, and even in the 19th century, an Atheist or non-religious person was more likely to be a Republican than a Democrat. A politician could not survive if they admit to being an Atheist, in either party, and never could.

The Republicans got hijacked by the religious right, and the Democrats got wrecked by the far-left.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by delusionsofNORMALity

by current standards, to be labeled a liberal is one of the worst insults imaginable. the agenda of the liberal elite has become a quest for the ultimate nanny-state and many life-long liberals are now embarrassed to be associated with such totalitarian ideals.

---

I see just as much wanting for a nanny state on the republican side as the dems, just under the guise of different reasonings.


I also think that the term liberal is ok, but I'd definitely despise being called a democrat (which I'd assume most people would call me if i were in the states).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hardcore Newbie

I see just as much wanting for a nanny state on the republican side as the dems, just under the guise of different reasonings.


I also think that the term liberal is ok, but I'd definitely despise being called a democrat (which I'd assume most people would call me if i were in the states).

---

You never know, they might call you anything. Being a Democrat most of my life (I'm an independent, whatever that means) I don't feel it's a badge of dishoner. In fact I'd say lately with all the scandal in the repube party they are the more dishonorable party. Why Canadians think they have a say in our politics is beyond me. You don't see americans posting opinions about your politics. I'd say, look to your own government and keep them as honest as you can before you end up with this mess we have down here.

Oddly, candians seem to feel they have a right to express their opinions on anything they damb well please. Oh, wait, they do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by medicinal

You never know, they might call you anything. Being a Democrat most of my life (I'm an independent, whatever that means) I don't feel it's a badge of dishoner. In fact I'd say lately with all the scandal in the repube party they are the more dishonorable party. Why Canadians think they have a say in our politics is beyond me. You don't see americans posting opinions about your politics. I'd say, look to your own government and keep them as honest as you can before you end up with this mess we have down here.

---

I didn't say that I had a say, but why not talk about it? If you followed Canadian politics you'd probably have fun discussing it.

Seeing as i don't have television (I have a tv, but no cable or channels at all) I get a few different news feeds on American politics delivered to my google reader. I haven't been able to find a decent Canadian one yet, which sucks, because I'd like to learn a lot more about Canadian Politics.

But I do agree, that "republican" is a worse name than "democrat" right now, just all the shit that's been happening is crazy.