Printable View
Materials-
Scale
Bud buster with keif screen
and weed
Common sense
Gram test
1. scale an amount of weed in(1 Gram is what Im testing in)
2. Take Bud and put it in buster with keif screen and start busting up.
3.when down take raw bud out and weight it in.
4.mark down what its weights in too
5.take keif(thc crystals) and weight it in on scale.
ex if your raw bud weights in too .8 and your keif weights in too .2 your thc levels in your bud are around 20% thc
PLEASE STICKY THREAD
? are you sure about this chief? :wtf:
uhm your just weighing the trichomes...inside the capitate stalks and bulbus heads of the trichome is where the thc,cbd,cbn is found so its not all thc just proves its about 20% trichome yeild..i have no clue on how they find thc% but i know the thc is inside of the bulbus heads of the trichomes
well i guess its a start to finding thc levels
Yea I'm not so sure it sounds somewhat reasonable but I dunno if thats necessarily measure thc content.
there's no way you can measure thc levels with weight.. atleast not without some pretty scientific equipment (if you could even do it that way)
it is a way with out having to be a scientist and its it a resonible guestamit, u have to admit that
No it's not. You're just weighing trichomes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stoned_Friend
There's still some thc in the plant matter.
LMFAO AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA ROFL AHAHAHA.
hate to say it but i think you was missing your last material on this test.
i would say that, that keif is only at max 90% thc anyways.< not sure. but yeah it is deffenitly not telling you the thc level. when you smoked the busted up bud i bet you got high. just my 2cents
Hopefully you aren't serious
Dude, relax, he could be new to this. What would you think if someone laughed at you like that? Give him some credit for trying something new... :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt the Funk
Anyways a lot of people are right (the ones who said it), the trichomes contain more then just thc. You see potency is not necessarily for the amount of trichomes, it's the individual trichome that needs to be tested to find out if the sample is potent or not.
This thread however has sparked up a hint of interest with me though, i never did read up on how you test potency of thc in a sample so i think i will do that now. :rastasmoke:
I can't remeber where I saw it but there was a chemical potency test kit online some time ago. that would be the only true test of potency
Erowid Cannabis Vault : Articles & Writings
some info on kif and pot thc content
I am reading this article Medical Cannabis Potency Testing Project - Autumn 1999
and it appears that THC percentage is determined by a "standard methanol extraction technique" :thumbsup:
On another note, they detected 28 percent CBD in one sample, the runner up had 5 percent CBD. What's up with that? :wtf:
think shit through before you post stoner friend, little bits of plant matter still get through, plus you lose some on the surface of the grinder, and keif has barely any weight to it, not to mention that weight has nothing to do with potency, you would need a fully stocked lab and 8 years in university before you will come up with accurate results
but uh...nice try there skipper
no need for hating
I don't think so. THC levels means the percentage of the potency is measured. Average THC levels last time I checked of buds was tested at 7-15% and that doesn't even include the other cannabinoids that are produced, so how could you possibly figure your bud has 20% of THC? That type of thing takes a lot of work and tools that you probably can't afford to run THC level tests..Bad mistake coming on here trying to start off being cool. We don't care rather you're cool or not but you honestly just made a fool of your self.
o sry i thought thc cystal meant pure and read on the top must need common sense something most of u dont seem to have.
Different strains produce different potency. I think the higher the CBD the stronger indica plant it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by jessem98
ic most of u like to hate on people who try something new i dont hate on peoples stupid ideas i post ways that can make them better at least u could of done something like that, u cant say everything u said was correct and to reply to one orangemans posts i didnt think i was cool at all and to reply to aziz93 take atleast 80% percent of that then! i was just tryin to help but thanks for bringin me down
What are you 12? Grow up kid. Don't be a little bitch so soon. You fucked up, let it go already. Posts like this only make us remember longer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stoned_Friend
chill out, ur all being a complete dick to him. so he had an idea to test thc and it was bs, get over it.
i'm curious why you always 'run in' like 'captain save a hoe' all the time lmao..Quote:
Originally Posted by orange floyd
i'm tempted to erase that top part for fear it's gonna be taken as an insult.. but i'll leave it cuz i'm drunk and it's funny...
anyways... i never saw anyone 'ganging up' on him.. so not everyoen agrees with him... that's not ganging up on him... ganging up on him would be calilng him stupid, idiot, retarded, ect ect.... no one's doing that...
everyone just told him he's not right....
well it would be somthing like testing for fat in a gummie bear(lol i did it in science class) Im sure u could mix the weed with somthing to get just thc or somthing like that but im pretty high, an there mite not be a way.... research that shit...
Quote:
Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho
when else have i ever ...ok im not even gonna quote that because ill sound fucking retarded cause im trying to be serious (although it was pretty funny).
but yea when else have i ever..."ran in" like a "captain save a hoe"..?
hmmm... o.0 you might not have but for some reason i remembered you coming into atleast one other thread telling everyoen to back off...
not saying nothing bad about it :jointsmile: and i could very well be wrong... i don't have the best memory... but i thought i remembered you doing it.... if you haven't... well then just return to sender those CSAH briefs i just mailed you :D
haha word. i dont remember doing it but thats not to say it never happened. oh well.Quote:
Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho
I don't think its as simple as that dude...Quote:
Originally Posted by Stoned_Friend
i know i was just testin man, peace my fellow stoner no more hate words peace, any body sayin peace awell were supposed to unite not fight
Quote:
Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho
In a way they are man. Orangeman and other posts i saw in here are making me angry cause yes, he is wrong, but should he be condemned for this? His original intention was to post something to HELP this community and in turn hes got people calling him a fool... No one likes being wrong, and then some people have to try to humiliate him?
That my friend is wrong, and now they are also at fault.
I just have to say this guy gets an A for effort, but an F for not realizing this would never, ever, EVER work. I think we can all see the flaws in this "plan", so i feel no need to address them further.
I will simply say "Stoned Friend, no more posts like this one, and also, you cannot fake being a cool mellow hippy by using words like 'peace', 'unite', 'hate', and 'man' sporadiclly throughout your ramblings. Do not pass go, do not collect $200.
[Disclaimer: I do not in any way attack the OP personally, i am simply disagreeing with his ideas, and his way of stating them. Thank you, and have a nice day.]
hahaha!Quote:
Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho
but yeah i was just saying why i think it is false i was not downing him. i did feel bad after i read it beacuse to me i could see a smile on his face as he was typing his post out. "im saving the world" but was a far cry from it. lol.
hey, good shot though. i am sure einstein made a few dumb studys and thought that the outcome was correct.
Thats like try to measure a chocolate kettle...:rasta: