do u like circumsied or uncircumsied? does it matter?
Printable View
do u like circumsied or uncircumsied? does it matter?
rofl man.... the only time they see it is when it's hard, and it doesn't really matter at that point.
yea when i moved to the states 4 like 2 years and i found out that they were circumsized over there o was like omg wtf. it was mad awkward. why did they start circumsizin anyway? i know they do it to jews but why did the americans and canadians do it i mean im pretty sure every other country in the world the guys arent circumsized. this will be interesting to hear form the ladies on this one.
Some babies get circumsized after birth to avoid some type of infection from occuring...
if you get an infection from not being circumsized then why does every other country in the world besides the us and i think canada keep their babies uncircumsized? i dont buy that infection claim do they have any proof?
i prefer circumsized.
well I love my boyfriends uncircumsized penis. It's great because you don't need any lube to give him a hand job so going down the road we don't need anything!! lol also I think that he gets more pleasure during sex because his head isn't rubbing on his pants all the time. Plus it's fun to play with it when it's soft and stretch it and........okay said to much......then it usually gets hard and we have sex.....
haha hope that helped.
In the US it's supposed to be to reduce the number of urinary tract infections in baby boys. But I don't know why the rest of the world doesn't suffer from them, too. :confused:
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha lmfao goose u are original babe :D:D. I just love ur silly ass to peices:). I could sit here and read ur damn posts all day.Quote:
Originally Posted by GooseBear
Circumcised i prefer anyday.
wat a very wierd topic i didnt think it mattered =o
ok this is one weird post that i was kinda freaked out by.. but i felt i must share my love of history with you all.
that all started during biblical times, the jews did it to signafiy a deal they made with god (( or for the PC ppl they did it as a way to ID the jewish men from the gentiles but no where have i ever heard that the jews walked around naked...)) then the babaloinians did it to keep the men from getting a fungus.. i kow ICH! anyway the fugus was said to "itch like a black worm ((leach)). well after babalon fell to the persians the practice continued, as time went by it was kind of a fasion statement *scratches head* but still i dont think ppl walked around naked.
as of to day the practice continues, due to faith or maybe bcause ppl have an uncanny nack for cutting things off they dont see an obvious use for RIGHT NOW! ?? :D :D :rolleyes:
I like it better uncircumsised, just because it's funner that way. I think the guy would get more pleasure anyway. I never had sex with anyone that was circumside. Does it feel any different???? :confused:
It dont feel much different cause when there erect there pretty much the same.I just prefer circumcised its cleaner cause i think uncircumcised blokes smell and they get foreskin cheese ewwwwww.Quote:
Originally Posted by Belleza
eeew foreskin cheese. that's only if the guys a nasty ass who doesn't pull the skin back when he showers. imma go throw up now....
Foreskin cheese? Thats the nastiest fucking thing I've ever heard.....
lmao at foreskin cheese. ive never herd of that and i hope i never will again! i think its obvious american and canadian girls are gonna like circumsized coz thats what there used to and uncircumsized is so unfamiliar and weird to them and its completely the opposite for every1 else in the world. this is my opinion but im rpetty sure im rite.
bro... when i read the first girls post about tuggin on teh wangskin i was thinkin, "ok thats kewl, id let a chick tug my foreskin", but then that other chick went and ruined it...
yup im still glad im circumsized!
its doctor recomened! to prevent health problems. some doectors may disagree to the need but the majority do agree. also like father like son and yeah most americans are, but first and formost its for health
sorry to say this but that was an ignorant post. its not a health risk otherwise every other country in the world EXCEPT america and canada have uncircumsized penis.' its doctor recommended in the states but not anyware else. they may claim its for health but its not a health risk.Quote:
Originally Posted by imagoober
Actually doctors from many other places recommend it as well..
And that's not coming from American ignorance, as I know I won't be forcing my kid to be circumcized. I'll be leaving that up to my wife. Heard it really fucks up the pleasure factor.
And Reefer, your post is the ignorant post. You know damn well America and Canada would recommend anything health positive. It's not like the doctors are telling us to eat our McDonalds.
well if your kids american i would seriously reccomend him being circumsized because if hes not he'l be an outcast trust me i know i lived in the states for like 2 years and it was awkward as fuck. and what im saying about the health issue is that its not neccesary to be circumsized and if it were that much of a health risk then why doesnt every other country except america and canada start circumsizing their boys? thats all im trying to say i dont think im being ignorant but ofcourse i would say that. but if you still feel im being ignorant after my explanation then please explain how. thanks peaceQuote:
Originally Posted by Encatuse
In some cultures they do it to discourage masturbation - I thought :confused:
Oh, which do I prefer ~ hmmmmmmmmmm not bothered actually wouldn't bother me either way is cool.
Yeah, your explanation cleared things up. Sorry bout the mis-understanding. As for circumcizing my kid, well, if things go my way, I won't be having a kid, and thereby not have to worry about the whole issue. lol
yea i know jewish people did it to recognize their religion or something to do with religion but i want to know where the americans got their research about how its healthier any1 have any statistics or anything like that.
The merits of circumcision are currently under debate. There is NOT a compelling medical rationale for the procedure in healthy boys. However, some boys have medical conditions where circumcision may be needed.
http://www.cirp.org/library/history/
Many theories have been advanced to explain the origin of genital mutilation. One theory postulates that circumcision began as a way of "purifying" individuals and society by reducing sexuality and sexual pleasure. Human sexuality was seen as dirty or impure in some societies; hence cutting off the pleasure-producing parts was the obvious way to "purify" someone.
It is now known that the male foreskin, or prepuce, is the principal location of erogenous sensation in the human male. Removal of the prepuce substantially reduces erogenous sensation.Therefore (in the appropriate cultural context), circumcision is revealed as a sacrifice of "sinful" human enjoyment (in this earthly life), for the sake of holiness in the afterlife.
http://www.cirp.org/library/general/preston/
A Consideration of Routine Neonatal Circumcision
CAPT E. Noel Preston, MC, USAF
Routine neonatal circumcision has been advocated as a means of preventing genitourinary diseases and genital cancers. However, the procedure has been found to have been of questionable benefit and to be associated with both immediate and delayed risks and complications. These in turn may produce undesirable psychologic, sexual, and medico-legal difficulties. Circumcision is considered with respect to carcinoma of the cervix, penis, and prostate; there is little evidence that circumcision of the newborn affords protection against subsequent development of these cancers in individuals who practice good personal hygiene.
[CIRP Note: This article is historic in nature. Preston's article along with that of Leitch, which was also published in 1970, disproved the false claim by Abraham Wolbarst that male circumcision could prevent penile cancer. Its publication influenced the American Academy of Pediatrics which issued a statement the following year that said "there are no valid medical indications for circumcision in the neonatal period."]
My son was not circumcised until he was almost a year old only because he was getting bladder infections and he's never had another since in 8 years. He had other medical reasons for this, and had it not been for those, he would not have been circumcised and we are 100% American. I just believe it's unnecessary unless it becomes a health risk.Quote:
Originally Posted by Encatuse
Either circumcised or un is just fine...they're both waaay better than battery operated. :rolleyes: :D
Sometimes................... ~lol~Quote:
Originally Posted by maryjanemama
:D
Im with you MJM, especially about the battery operated part.
Ok, for one thing I don't think circumcision discourages masturbation at all. LoL. And another thing could be that other countries don't do it because it is associated with the Jewish religion. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against Jews. One of my best friends is Jewish. However, other people in the world dont feel as I do.
It is compulsory for all Muslims to be circumcised and every year there is a religious ceremony performed where young Muslim boys are prepared for the imminent cut.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brimstone
wow really i did not know that thanks for that info lulu.
lmao @ foreskin cheese
DAMN........
THE TRUTH IS......THERE ARE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES TO BOTH.
UNCUT FEELS BETTER
CUT IS EASIER TO KEEP CLEAN.
PERIOD
SMOKE POT
how bout a cheese sandwich everyone......LMAO
what do you call an ethiopian with a yeast infection......
A QUARTER POUNDER WITH CHEESE......
One more tid bit....
Until the age of 2 or 3 years... the foreskin is attached to the head of the penis with the same membrane that keeps our fingernails attached to our fingers...
The foreskin can not/ should not be pulled back or cut off until this membrane naturally releases the forskin from the head of the penis.. aka HELMET, Mushroom, etc
During this two year, helmet incubation period the head of the penis is still developing... by removing the foreskin, this development stops... : (
yeh, i only know 1 person who is circumcised... he had it removed when he was 3 cuz it was still attached or summit like that... he sais he still remembers being in pain n walkin like a penguin... circumcised is prolly better cuz of the whole smeg thing goin on.... ewwww....
this is all ridiculous, for a long time circumcision was deemed very jewish so not practiced but when jews came over to america and europe and being involved with christian anglo-saxons it was adopted because the jews could make money doing it, they are good at that shit and i guessed people liked it, then it was predomininatly borught over to america and stopped there but true white people, at least in europe dont get circumcised anymore but it is still widely practiced in america unfortunately, truly just another way that cultures intermingle and adopt rituals that were not natural for them, we might get it right one day but for now....people stil get their foreskin cut off