The Left finally find a cause that they can support that will kill US troops

The left finally find a cause they can support that will kill US troops

BrookesNews.Com ^ | Monday May 15 2006 | Gerard Jackson


Since the liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq the Democratsâ?? Leninist core, the leftwing MainStream Media Party and the leftâ??s Hollywood collaborators have been doing everything in their power to demoralise the troops, delegitimise the President, subvert the war on terror and sabotage victory over the terrorists in Iraq. In other words, they have behaved like traitors.

Yet when Bill Clinton continuously bombed the Serbia from a height of 15,000 feet without UN permission he was overwhelmingly hailed by the left as a great humanitarian and liberator. President Bush liberates 50,000,000 Muslims from tyranny and heâ??s Adolf Hitler. Americaâ??s cause in Iraq is just as noble as the Vietnam War, the loss of which led to millions being massacred, with the help of the US left, by communist fanatics and yet the left still take malicious pride in the holocaust they helped create. They are now trying to do the same to the Iraqi people.

With the left there is neither shame nor honour, but there is consistency â?? and it is their remorseless hatred of the United States and of liberty. Right now the two-faced Rev. John L. McCullough, executive director of the pro-communist America-hating Church World Service, is calling for the United States to take unilateral military action in Darfur. This sanctimonious hypocrite self-righteously declared:

Already hundreds of thousands have died, and far too many others are at risk of the unrelenting tide of death that is sweeping across hot desert sands. The time for political posturing has expired. The time for decisive action is now

Millions died at the hands of communist despots and he stridently opposed US efforts to save them. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died on the orders of Saddam, and yet this dog-collared liar condemned the liberation of the Iraqi people and damns the efforts of the US to destroy the terrorists who would turn Iraq into a charnel house.

What gives with this scum? Why do they now demand action in Darfur where most of the Christians have already been exterminated by neo-Nazi Muslim fanatics who are now in the process of exterminating black Muslims?

Why are these victims of neo-Nazi Muslim fanatics more deserving of US aid than the victims of the Taliban and Saddam? And by what moral authority does President Bush now have to act against these mass murderers that he didnâ??t have to topple those other tyrants?

Why are these leftists and sundry Democrats demanding an interventionist policy that guarantees more body bags? These the same sleazebags that are still drooling at the thought of US casualties in Iraq. Moreover, the American liberation was slandered by many of these very same hypocrites as an outrageous act of imperialism designed to steal Iraqâ??s oil.

Itâ??s the same old story. When President Reagan funded anti-Marxist groups struggling to overthrow pro-Soviet Latin American regimes he was accused by Democrats of interfering in these statesâ?? internal affairs, even though these states intended to spread revolution right up to the Rio Grande. (They might yet still succeed). Yet these brilliant political analysts ridiculed Reagan when he pointed this fact out.

(During his 1980 campaign the infamous Jimmy Carter asserted that the election would determine â??whether we have peace or warâ?�, meaning that Reagan was the real threat. In 1984 the Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill parroted Carterâ??s nonsense by confiding to the Soviet ambassador, Anatoly Dobrynin, that Reagan â??is a dangerous manâ?�. Itâ??s patently obvious that in 1972 the Dems decided that the Republicans were the real enemy of America, never the Soviet empire and its allies and satrapies. And they still consider the Republicans to be the real enemy and not Islamo-Nazies).

So now we have it. Any action that is seen as advancing â??American imperialist interestsâ?�, such as defending South Vietnam against communist aggression, resisting Marxist-Leninist regimes in Central and South America, overthrowing brutal Arab dictatorships, defending US borders, opposing the sadistic thugs in Iran and North Korea is immediately condemned as an act of aggression.

This is why copperheads like McCullough and George Clooney supported the attack on Serbia and now demand action in Darfur while insisting that Iraqis be handed over to neo-Nazi Muslims and their savage allies in Tehran.

The leftâ??s conscience is a political three card trick. Fun to perform but never meant to achieve anything other satisfy the playersâ?? putrefying ego.

Gerard Jackson is Brookesâ?? economics editor

"Americaâ??s cause in Iraq is just as noble as the Vietnam War,"


Like how you wanted to force capitalism in the cong, you want to force democrazy on muslims. Both equally worthless american ideals. Theres no oil in darfur, so the inbred racist rednecks of the amerikkkan dont care.
Entire article is garabge, its not journalism. Why post it?

No war for monica yelled the republicans ahhhh you demopublicans all the same, the neo-cons are the real commies ....If all fails just blame clinton, Clinton did it:thumbsup:

Since the liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq the Democratsâ?? Leninist core, the leftwing MainStream Media Party and the leftâ??s Hollywood collaborators have been doing everything in their power to demoralise the troops, delegitimise the President, subvert the war on terror and sabotage victory over the terrorists in Iraq. In other words, they have behaved like traitors.

How can you sit there and say that both afganistan and iraq is liberated when if you have a look at the state its in right now its in total kiosk.And what about the rightys hollywood collarborators and the rightwing media doing for starters not being a true jounalist and releasing the real stories that goes on in iraq and not some bullshit made up by bushs advisors,No we aren't the traitors here its all you people that are pretty well flushing america down the toilet.

Yet when Bill Clinton continuously bombed the Serbia from a height of 15,000 feet without UN permission he was overwhelmingly hailed by the left as a great humanitarian and liberator. President Bush liberates 50,000,000 Muslims from tyranny and heâ??s Adolf Hitler. Americaâ??s cause in Iraq is just as noble as the Vietnam War, the loss of which led to millions being massacred, with the help of the US left, by communist fanatics and yet the left still take malicious pride in the holocaust they helped create. They are now trying to do the same to the Iraqi people.

And quite frankly bill clinton wasn't any better than bush in regards to serbia and he certainly wasn't prasied for this ethier.And I don't see how you can say its like the vietnam war no mate its what your doing to the iraqis right now is destroying there lively hood and for what they weren't going to invade america get real yet you go and invade there country and thats all mean't to be ok because the bush adminstration saids so!

With the left there is neither shame nor honour, but there is consistency â?? and it is their remorseless hatred of the United States and of liberty. Right now the two-faced Rev. John L. McCullough, executive director of the pro-communist America-hating Church World Service, is calling for the United States to take unilateral military action in Darfur. This sanctimonious hypocrite self-righteously declared:

Right now the two face bush and cheney are sitting there laughing at you and whilst there at it, destroying america before your eyes.

Already hundreds of thousands have died, and far too many others are at risk of the unrelenting tide of death that is sweeping across hot desert sands. The time for political posturing has expired. The time for decisive action is now

Now is the time to get real and realise that now is the time to get the hell out of iraq you've got what you want so piss off back into your own country and get a few things sorted out like having your own democracy instead of trying to fuck other countries over.Yeah and i'm sure there has been hundreds of thousands of iraqi and afgany people and they have risk there lives.

Millions died at the hands of communist despots and he stridently opposed US efforts to save them. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died on the orders of Saddam, and yet this dog-collared liar condemned the liberation of the Iraqi people and damns the efforts of the US to destroy the terrorists who would turn Iraq into a charnel house.

Yeah Saddam might of done this and if he had it would of being up to the Iraqi people to bring him to justice not some outsider wanker that doesn't even live in the country?

What gives with this scum? Why do they now demand action in Darfur where most of the Christians have already been exterminated by neo-Nazi Muslim fanatics who are now in the process of exterminating black Muslims?

Yeah and what gives bush the right to invade another country ilegally and destory it?

Why are these victims of neo-Nazi Muslim fanatics more deserving of US aid than the victims of the Taliban and Saddam? And by what moral authority does President Bush now have to act against these mass murderers that he didnâ??t have to topple those other tyrants?

Why are these leftists and sundry Democrats demanding an interventionist policy that guarantees more body bags? These the same sleazebags that are still drooling at the thought of US casualties in Iraq. Moreover, the American liberation was slandered by many of these very same hypocrites as an outrageous act of imperialism designed to steal Iraqâ??s oil.

Sounds like your talking about your own party here not the leftys there the ones bringing in the body bags not the democrats or the leftys it was your party that decided to go on this high school adventure.

Itâ??s the same old story. When President Reagan funded anti-Marxist groups struggling to overthrow pro-Soviet Latin American regimes he was accused by Democrats of interfering in these statesâ?? internal affairs, even though these states intended to spread revolution right up to the Rio Grande. (They might yet still succeed). Yet these brilliant political analysts ridiculed Reagan when he pointed this fact out.

(During his 1980 campaign the infamous Jimmy Carter asserted that the election would determine â??whether we have peace or warâ?�, meaning that Reagan was the real threat. In 1984 the Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill parroted Carterâ??s nonsense by confiding to the Soviet ambassador, Anatoly Dobrynin, that Reagan â??is a dangerous manâ?�. Itâ??s patently obvious that in 1972 the Dems decided that the Republicans were the real enemy of America, never the Soviet empire and its allies and satrapies. And they still consider the Republicans to be the real enemy and not Islamo-Nazies).

So now we have it. Any action that is seen as advancing â??American imperialist interestsâ?�, such as defending South Vietnam against communist aggression, resisting Marxist-Leninist regimes in Central and South America, overthrowing brutal Arab dictatorships, defending US borders, opposing the sadistic thugs in Iran and North Korea is immediately condemned as an act of aggression.

This is why copperheads like McCullough and George Clooney supported the attack on Serbia and now demand action in Darfur while insisting that Iraqis be handed over to neo-Nazi Muslims and their savage allies in Tehran.

The leftâ??s conscience is a political three card trick. Fun to perform but never meant to achieve anything other satisfy the playersâ?? putrefying ego.

And you think that the rightys don't perform man you should see them shuffle those cards and what a hand that they have dealt.:mad:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Torog

Americaâ??s cause in Iraq is just as noble as the Vietnam War, the loss of which led to millions being massacred, with the help of the US left, by communist fanatics and yet the left still take malicious pride in the holocaust they helped create.

---

Well, it's not a very popular thought, especially amoung the right-wingers who want to blame the loss of the Vietnam War on the left, but many experts in South East Asian history and politics will now say that our very presence in Vietnam virtually guaranteed the communist victory.

For hundreds, if not thousands of years, Vietnam had been controlled by foriegn powers. First China, then France, then Japan, then France again. In 1955, just when it looked like they might be their own country at last we had to go against the Geneva accords and set up a puppet government in the South led by an unpopular, Catholic (in a nation of Buddhists), president-Diem. Ironically we also back the coup that assinated President Diem 8 years later. By the mid '60's South Vietnam has essentailly lost it's independance and was controlled by the U.S.. To make matters worse, the money brought in by the U.S. soldiers created rampant inflation to the point that many Veitnamese could no longer afford goods which were inexpensive a few yaers earlier.

What happened is that for many Vietnamese, the war was not a question of Communism vs Capitalism. It became an issue of independence from yet another foriegn power. The Communist got the popular support not because of their political ideology, the got it because they were driving out the foreign invaders. If we really wanted to defeat the Communists, we should have signed up for their team.

Lets just hope the same thing doesn't happen in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The left is more liberal, while the right is more conservative. It always looks good to have a member of the right to be a dictator (Bush).

The war in Afghanistan and Iraq are all based on lies. We do NOT need to be in both places!! 9/11 was engineered by the US government and Elite. We went to Afghanistan because the Taliban was there, but now we found out that the Taliban had nothing to do with 9/11. Can you say opium poppies and heroin? lol.

Then 2 years later out of of nowhere, Saddam Hussein all of a sudden becomes a greater threat than bin Laden who was supposedly the architect of 9/11. Well, shouldn't you have gone after bin Laden and not Saddam? It is now common knowledge that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction and this war is becoming more and more unpopular. Actually, this is considered treason to lie to Congress and the American people. Can you say oil? How many more innocents have to die??!!! :confused: :mad:

2 things will come out of this situation:

1. 9/11 was really caused by the Taliban, but just to slap the US in the face but the US took advantage of the oppurtunity (Patriot Act, Iraq war). Bush will end his term in 2009 as the worst President in US history and life will go on. There is no conspiracy to 9/11.

2. 9/11 was the Reichstag Fire of Amerika and Amerika will become a fascist state, along with the rest of the world, aka the New World Order. There is a secret occultic organization controlling the world with guidance from extra-terrestrials. The leaders of the world are collaborating with the aggressive warlike Greys from Zeta Reticulli and Reptilians from Alpha Draconis, while these aliens' real plan is to take the Earth for themselves. The leaders have shunned the more spiritually advanced Arcturians in favor of technology and weaponry. Bush is now a dictator and will remain in power until the Earth changes happen. By 2012, the leaders of our world will be terminated and the world will ascend to a 5th dimensional level in the Photon Field and be forever changed. Bush is Mabus..the third anti-christ predicted by Nostradamus.

I am going with option 2!!

hold up gs...im out of foil for my hat.... yopu should warn us before you say shit like that...

grays....and reptilains....this is ZETA talk......wtf about zacharia sitchins theroy? ill go buy some foil if you are going in this direction....

way better than every body is a nsa nazi

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Great Spirit

The leaders of the world are collaborating with the aggressive warlike Greys from Zeta Reticulli and Reptilians from Alpha Draconis, while these aliens' real plan is to take the Earth for themselves.

---

I want what ever this guys smoking

michael hayden looks like a grey:D anyone ever seen Dreamcatcher...good movie

First I am Neither Democrat Or Republican,Left Or Right...Most People I Speak with Feel Like I Do... Neither One Or the Other,Not Red Or Blue. This Sounds Like Most Of The US Is in The Middle....Sooo Where Is The Purple,Ya Know If You Mix Red an Blue You get Purple. There Are No Purple States On ANY Map(Politcal Or Otherwise) No Purple Counties Or Cities Nothing!! If Most Of the U.S.A Is Centrist Then We Should Vote an Act In Said Same Manner
I'm VERY Tired Of All The Bickering...I Jus Want My Goverment To Do Something....Like Earn What We Pay Them!!

Instead We Get Super-Frantic-Non-Productive-Nothing-Legisation!!! NOTHING GETS DONE!!! ENOUGH!!!

STOP THE INSANITY!!!

Fuck Bush
Fuck Gore
Fuck Cheany
Fuck Kerry
Fuck Rumesfeld
Fuck Rove
Fuck Rice
Fuck 'Em All!!!

Its Time To Elect People Who Will Do The Job...NOT Argue!!!!!