Is it possible to get just as high through oral consumption as you do when smoking?
Printable View
Is it possible to get just as high through oral consumption as you do when smoking?
you get more medical effect orally over a longer period of time versus smoking
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...vsmokedbig.gif
That graph is completely inaccurate. You get SO much higher off of edibles than with smoking. Smoking a gram vs. eating a gram..no comparison
Well its spread out over a longer time period so your peak isn't as high as smoking wouldQuote:
Originally Posted by AbrandnewL
however, smoking does destroy a lot of THC before it reaches your lungs
I prefer smoking so I can control the duration more
Yes... in fact, is possible to get FAR higher than smoking... but the effects of eaten cannabis takes much longer to kick in (hours) and lasts much longer (sometimes more than 24 hours). Also, it takes a much larger amount of eaten cannabis to reach the same level of highness you could get from smoking.Quote:
Originally Posted by NGC1300
Like, if you eat 1g of cannabis you would get a high far less intense (but much longer lasting) than if you smoked this same 1g. But, if you eat like 3-4g you could get the same level of highness (intensity) of smoking 1g, but lasting WAY longer.
Thats a nice graphic! I got a graphic like this one when i did make a mathematical/pharmacological model of the cannabis absorption by the body, and compared smoked and eaten cannabis.Quote:
Originally Posted by Revanche21
Well... usually smoking is one of the most wasteful ways of ingesting THC, as a lot of THC is burnt away, a lot of it goes (literally) "up in the smoke", etc... so it may seem that eating is indeed more efficient.Quote:
Originally Posted by AbrandnewL
Yet, its not true. I do smoke (and sometimes eat) hash oil, which is one of the purest forms of THC. I smoke it in an way that has virtually NO waste, so all THC in is is absorbed. And i noticed that smoking is indeed FAR superior to eating. When i smoke it, i need only a very small amount of it to get high (as all of it is inhaled without ANY waste), but when i eat it (properly "cooked" into any suitable food) i need an amount some 10 times greater than i smoke to reach the same level of highness. So, when there is no waste, smoking is indeed way better than eating.
Absolutely - in fact you can get much higher for much longer. It is also a lot more efficient - the bud that you might smoke up in a week will probably produce enough oil to keep you stoned for a month.Quote:
Originally Posted by NGC1300
The math looks something like this:
(:eat::eat::eat::eat: = :S5:) <------<<< :thumbsup:
Baked Goods Are Nice :D
Edibles are great, it's easy to eat too much though and you'll end up with a hangover headache. The high is very different from smoking almost like taking a pain pill.
Also when you go poo, it smells like cannabutter:thumbsup:
Absolutely! The highest high I have ever had has been from edibles. You can get TOO high and very uncomfortable if you don't dose it right. Check out the Recipoes subforum and the Medicated Edibles subforum for recipes, techniques and ideas. I like Green Dragon, and I have made brownies from canabutter. Both work great!Quote:
Originally Posted by NGC1300
Thats What I would worry about, The Doses.I don't want to have a Freak Out because I consumed Too much.We all have different tolerances.:stoned:
The best you could do is follow other peoples cooking guidelines when making your Own see if its too much or too little.