Fact: Joints are not more wasteful

Many people believe that joints waste more weed than other techniques such as pipes and bongs. They base this belief on the observation of a larger stream of smoke emitted by the tip of a joint, whereas the bowl has a small thin one.

THIS IS BECAUSE THE JOINT IS ALSO BURNING PAPER!

This can be proven. If you make a very long, skinny joint, and smoke 1/4 of it, you can carefully unwrap the paper off of it, leaving a long weed stick intact. It has to be very sticky weed to do this.

If you were to smoke this paper-less joint, you would see the same size stream of smoke emitted from its tip.

Case closed.

What the hell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by robo scat

What the hell.

---

I can understand that.

naw man. you have it wrong because of this:
"Many people believe that joints waste more weed than other techniques such as pipes and bongs. They base this belief on the observation of a larger stream of smoke emitted by the tip of a joint, whereas the bowl has a small thin one."

The reason I think joints are more wasteful is because they are constantly burning, even when you arent hitting them. at least with me and my friends hitting the bowl until its stopped burning is kinda common sense, sometimes you can't keep hitting it but thats like maybe 1/5 hits. so most of the time there is no smoke wasted with a bowl.

Besides, joints ARE more wasteful. :)
Than things like volcanoes.. and hookahs. :p

i think so to....u cantgo wrong with bong toke or pipe ripscuz u consume ALL the smoke

No dude they both stay burning while nobody's hitting it. But people thought the joint was more wasteful because it burned more smoke than a pipe did.

You know something wasteful? A blunt.

But I still love em.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wayoftheleaf

You know something wasteful? A blunt.

But I still love em.

---

very true!

blunts are bomb fuck i smoked like 2 today one sprinkled with coke and it was a chewy