What is an even bigger joke is evolutionists using evolution to try and disprove religions, wow....
You say religion is flawed but it is just as flawed as your evolutional theories...
Go figure:p
Printable View
What is an even bigger joke is evolutionists using evolution to try and disprove religions, wow....
You say religion is flawed but it is just as flawed as your evolutional theories...
Go figure:p
I wish evolution and science could explain hallucinogens to me also!
specifically how multiple people could have the same images from the substances
ALIENS, TAKE ME NOW.....
This is the only place ive ever been able to find information about how science explains hallucinogens but i dont nessicarily like the website it comes from....
http://deoxy.org/psyguide.htm#5
"There is no question a certain degree of merit to this hypothesis. However, one could ask as well: are there perhaps latent functions in the brain that are turned on by hallucinogens? This point of view has not been well addressed by scientific research for the simple fact that, how can you look at something if you don't know it exists? If there are functions turned on by hallucinogenic drugs in the brain that do not normally operate in our usual states of consciousness, then scientists have nothing to compare these states to, and thus are affected by a blind spot. Still, though this question of turning on latent functions is not easily addressed in terms of scientific thinking, we shall see below that occult views provide us a basis to reasonably address this question.
In spite of any hypothesis scientists may provide as to the operation of hallucinogens in the nervous system, we must put this discussion in its proper perspective. Whatever scientists may profess to know about the activity of hallucinogenic drugs is colored strongly by the fact that the current scientific understanding of how the brain and nerve cells work is highly incomplete.
And this point leads us back to philosophy. Because, on one hand, scientists like to believe that the brain creates consciousness, but on the other hand, scientist have only a partial and incomplete understanding of how the brain works. This seems like putting the cart before the horse to me. It is possible that science will come to understand in very full detail how the operation of the brain leads to memory formation and other psychological phenomena. But the point is, they only have a partial understanding at this point. If you took a brain scientist (a neurologist, or neurochemist, or whatever) and sat them down and asked; "How does the brain create consciousness?" They'll either B.S. you with a bunch of details and never directly answer your question, or they will out right honestly admit that this question simply cannot be answered with current knowledge (if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit!). So, the bottom line is, that science's contention that the brain creates consciousness is more belief and dogma than it is cold, hard, provable fact."
If you look into someones eyes ur looking at the key to the unvirse
Id agree with you maybe if you elaborated on that instead of making it sound like something you heard on TV
I am no more an "evolutionist" than I am a "gravitationist" or a "heliocentrist". I am just recognizing the facts discovered by modern science. Just because you have not observed the evidence and scrutinized it with proper logic does not mean that the overwhelming body of evidence isn't there. There is no doubt that evolution happened. Anybody who's ever seriously studied the fossil record and the distribution of fossils on this planet, or the molecular structures of various species of animals, could possibly deny this fact. It's not immediately obvious—like Einstein's theories you have to do a little studying to find out how evolution works and why alternative explanations were abandoned.Quote:
Originally Posted by C4nn4Bliss
You say that the processes behind life on this planet are unexplainable. Why do you start out with this assumption? We actually do have a lot of clues that show how life developed over billions of years, and there is information we can draw from this. Some things about life can be known, and one thing that we do know is that animals change over time.
Why should any animal stay the same? Does anything in this universe stay the same? No, everything is transient, everything changes. Nothing is permanent. That includes the genetic code of living organisms. Genetic changes manifest themselves as physical changes in the body of the organism. Sometimes those changes increase the chances of survival of that organism, and the offspring of that organism will have a greater chance of survival. Over long periods of time these greater chances will add up and that genetic change will spread to the whole species. Whether or not a change is beneficial is dependent on the organism's environment.
If one group of organisms is geographically separated from another, and they are unable to interbreed, they will be in different environments and will go on separate paths of genetic change. Over time, these changes add up to the point that the two groups can no longer interbreed and there are two species.
The origins of modern life forms are knowable, at least to an extent, because we have real concrete evidence to analyze. If you want to convince me that this analysis is incorrect, you're going to have to present to me a better alternative analysis of the fossil record and the body of molecular genetic evidence. Just saying "God did it" or "the aliens did it" explains nothing, especially when you don't have any real concrete evidence to back up the claim, and you have no explanation for where that form of intelligent life came from.
Do you have any idea how many complex chemical reactions are involved in the brain? Of course modern science hasn't understood everything about how the brain works and how consciousness works. It's really fucking complicated! I'd like to see you give it a try! Just because we don't know exactly how it works doesn't mean that it's not just happening according to the laws of physics. And it doesn't mean that we won't have a more complete answer someday in the future. But if we ever do get a more complete answer, it will definitely be through science and not religion or superstition or mythology.Quote:
Originally Posted by C4nn4Bliss
What's with the science-bashing? Sure, some things are unknowable to people today, but science is the only reliable method of knowing the universe that we have. There just isn't any better method. We have to be able to say "we don't know" when we don't know, but we should never give up the pursuit of knowledge. We can't start out by saying "this is inherently unknowable, and it's not worth our time trying to understand".
Quote:
Originally Posted by C4nn4Bliss
I didnt see it on tv it came from my head. Ive been doing allot of thinking latley about how our brain works and the universe ETC.... Its just something i cant explain. I have it all in my head but i just cant explain it specially trying to type it.
Just think of it this way there is so much other things that are happening all around us. We cannot see this because our state of mind wont allow it and we cannot control it. But if we could some how be able to get in touch with that part of our brain then we could live life sooo much differently and see half-way of the big picture. Nothing was made by a god. Ya we could have been made by aleins but theres more to that then what took place for them to be created. Things that make you hallucinate were put here for a reason, You probly dont see what im trying to explain at all but what ever thats my opinion.
Evolution does not require a single missing link, but a innumerable amount. We should be surrounded by a zoo of transitional forms that cannt be put into a category as one particular certain life form. But we don't see this unless i have overlooked some major discovery. There are different kinds of dogs, but all are claerly dogs. The fossils show different sizes of horses, but all are clearly horses. None are on the verge of being some other life form. The fossil record shows complex fossilized life suddenly appearing, and there are major gaps between the fossilized "kinds." If you read about Darwin you will find that he actually acknowledged that if his theory WERE true, it would require millions of transitional forms. He believed they would be found in fossil records. They haven't been..........
I didnt specifically say god or aliens did it was just explaining my thoughts on the flaws of science, evolution and their views on the origin of life. They leave out the major corner stone of their whole theory and then build the whole theory without this corner stone and then expect you to believe it. Like i said i do not deny evolution i just notice the holes in it. Life comes from life, plain and simple!