Loose Change-911 was an inside job.
Makeing personal attacks on the Creaters of the material instead of the Material presented is really tacky, and an unprofessional diversion tactic at best. Throwing things out there like "troothers meet your leaders" is really imature. For starters Im just gonna go out on a limb here and guess IDK that 9/11 truth is FAR bigger than Those in with the loose change crowd LOL. I would also like to add that a percentage of collage kids do live at home to save on tuition costs. I think its a great thing that Our youth are doing something for this country. Please stick to the FACTS Presented in the material. Examples> The manuvers preformed by several planes were Imposible to manuver by Profession pilots at the rates of speed they were going. Buildings falling at Free fall speed. Liquid pools of molten metal still burning 27 days later after the collapse. Prior warning. Norad Stand down order by Dick Chenney, Simulated drill Operation North woods being conducted on the same day at the same time. Day before Insurance policy was taken out on the towers. Donald Rumpsfeld held a Confrence The day prior Saying they lost 1 trillion dollars through the system-coincidently the evidence was taken out by the pentagon attack. Building 7 came down in its own foot print Like the two other towers and was not struck by a plane. alquida is a USA Proven CIA Created group to fight off the Russians during their invasion of afganistan.
Loose Change-911 was an inside job.
I'm thinking now, after reading and seeing a whole bunch of different opinions, that whatever the truth behind 9/11, the confusion surrounding those events was and is a part of the plan.
People talk about the idea that 9/11 would have to have involved so many people that you could never keep it a secret. I wonder if there aren't people in this country who question their own involvement in those events. Because the idea that there would need to be thousands involved is true, actually understated I think. It's possible that there would need to be so many people involved from such varying fields that many of those directly involved have no idea to this day that they played a part, however small. And if it's true that the whole op was an inside job, there must be those who realized after the fact that some random task or job they performed may very well have contributed in it's own way. Can those people come forward with what they might know? What if their knowledge led to the realization that this was an inside job? Would they be treated well by a populace who knows them only for being complicate in the deaths of thousands of Americans? I would think someone in this position would be scared to come forward.
I don't claim to have any answers, this is just the kind of thing I think about. I have all the same questions.
Loose Change-911 was an inside job.
I guess this is why we'll never see any proof Bin Laden was killed. He's probably kicking it on an island sipping margaritas while having his feet washed by the hair of 12 virgins.
Loose Change-911 was an inside job.
"It's possible that there would need to be so many people involved from such varying fields that many of those directly involved have no idea to this day that they played a part, however small..... "
Very true....
Two things make me suspicious as to the actual conspirators behind this whole spectacle....
1 - The time of the attacks - Terrorists want to cause as much destruction, mayhem and death as possible in each attack. If this were true, why hit the towers at 9am instead of 1pm? If terrorists actually did plot this attack, wouldn't they have had the intelligence to know that the buildings would have had thousands more people in them at mid-day as opposed to early morning? I'm not a terrorist but I am a trained combat veteran and one thing I know for sure is that when you go after your enemy, you hit them hard and without mercy..... 9am just seemed merciful.... Which is why I don't think terrorists plotted this attack....
2 - Witness Suicides - I have a very hard time believing that most, if not all, of the people who came forward publicly about testifying to their experience the morning of, would commit suicide.... Hello, the CIA wrote a book back in the 50's about how to commit a murder and make it look like a suicide. I believe it was an assassination manual.... I mean, how easy would it be for the CIA to covertly go after an unguarded target??? Very easy....
Just my take on it....
CGI::::::
Loose Change-911 was an inside job.
thats a great question, so many people would have to be in on it...Well Governments operate in compartamentalizeation..<not spelled correctly lol. Im sure the combat vets here can back me up. Thats how Operations are done, to maintain complete Opsec. havine it done at 9:00am in the morning as apposed to 1:00pm...<Well it seems to me that it would be better cause everyones busy going to work, there still tired, not really paying attention(wont remember as easily) George bush gets to have his little "On stage act" at the book reading to those school kids...and act surprised for the cameras(I mean come on go and back and watch that video and Dont say you arent laughing when you watch his act, lol)
Loose Change-911 was an inside job.
FWIW my neighbors brother in law picked up George Bush from AF1 as soon as it landed in DC that morning and if you people really think our government was in on this then please send me the seeds from what you're smoking! The terrorists had to coordinate four flights that took off at about the same time with long distance routes so they would be full of fuel, logistics probably paid a larger role in which flights were selected then the time of day.
A conspiracy would have involved a hell of a lot more people then just government employees, the entire staff at the Cleveland airport would have had to be in on it as well as the CEO's of United and AA, the cell phone companies would have had to have fabricated those calls made from United 93 as well as fabricated the interview with family members who spoke with those passengers. The head of security at the WTC would have had to been involved to pull this conspiracy off and he died RESCUING people from the towers. Lets not forget the 100's if not 1,000's of people on the freeway in DC who saw a PASSENGER JET fly directly overhead, not a MISSLE, a TV reporter reported he saw a passenger jet with the AA logo which is impossible to confuse with a missle. I've had wood pile fires burn the smolder for DAYS. Elevator shafts filled with liquid explosives? Ok, except for they would have had to take the elevators out of service while they were filling the shafts, plus they would have needed a way to get this massive amount of liquid into the building and begin filling the shafts without anyone knowing. The elevators were not out of service at the time of the attack! Buildings were wired with explosives you say? Again, impossible to wire enough explosives to those buildings to bring them down without anyone knowing. Ever watch a building being imploded by a demolition crew? It takes WEEKS just to wire the buildings they bring down which aren't close to the scale of the WTC. A demolition expert stated that it would literally take months to plan, design and execute an implosion of those buildings, the logistics and manpower involved would be impossible to go unnoticed. They showed the amount of work involved in a much smaller building they had demolished, he said it would have taken like 3 times longer and about 5 times as much manpower and explosives to bring down the WTC.
To put that in perspective the number of people involved in a conspiracy from both government and private businesses would have to number in the thousands, if the CEO of both United and AA were involved it would have to involve many, many more employees in those airlines(some of whom died in those planes). All the employees at Cleveland International, all the people involved in the demolition, all those people on the freeway, the entire security staff of the WTC including the head of security who died rescuing people, the owners of the WTC, the employees at Logan International(a friend of mine grew up with one screener at Logan who let one terrorist through and she said it really messed him up to learn of this) multiple levels of government employees, members of congress and the senate on down. That doesn't even take into account how many military personnel would need to be involved to cover this up, it would have had to have been a military aircraft that launched that "missle". Then there are all the family members of the passengers of United 93 who spoke to loved one's on their cell phones shortly before the passengers took over the plane. Documented records of the terrorists taking flight training classes in MN and purpously stalling the planes during simulation excersizes, the same guys identified as the terrorists who flew these planes into their targets as well as testimony from an instructor who clearly told these guys to STOP stalling the simulation excersize and was puzzled as to why they were doing this(at the time anyway). Now you would have to involve the people in that school in the conspiracy.
Is it REALLY rational to think our government orchestrated this entire event? Why bother hunting Bin Laden then? Maybe he isn't dead afterall huh? I never saw a body or or the pic's they claim to have, sounds like a pretty easy cover up right there to me not to mention they kept changing their official story of what happened right from day one. How many people would need to be involved in a cover up like this? Hardly any, just the crew that raided the compound which wasn't very many and a few government officials including Obama.
Loose Change-911 was an inside job.
PD - you are correct a conspiracy of this nature would be extremely hard to concieve and to cover up. I agree totally on this point.
The problems for me are some disturbingly unanswered questions that are clearly not answered by claiming that the cover up would be too dificult. Why was the hole in the side of the Pentagon too small for the aircraft that struck the building. How was the metal in that plane able to burn so completely that none of the parts of the plane were recovered inside the building yet all the bodies were recovered. Why did several of the CIA experts interviewed at the crash scene indicate that they smelled cordite when they should have only smelled burning jet fuel. Why did the towers collapse like a demolition and not fall like trees. Why did the third building collapse also like a demolition even though it was not struck.
To say a conspiracy is too difficult, and to explain the reasons why it is too difficult, does not advance any reasonable explanation on these troubling questions. If there was no conspiracy then these questions should be quickly and easily answered. Maybe bodies burn at a higher temperature than metal. Maybe there was cordite stored in one of the offices hit. Maybe the experts are wrong about expecting the buildings to fall like trees.
I have not seen the details of the molten metal and the nanothermite explosives. This seems to be more recent information. My questions are from the original event. Tell me the experts were wrong and give at least some kind of explanation.
Loose Change-911 was an inside job.
Compartimentlization. Apparetly they didnt go research the term. Mass amounts of people dont have to be "IN" on it If they are compartimentalized. This is how Operations are conducted in War with out the enemy knowing...
Really its not a conspiracy....Donald Rumpsfeld is now going around town hall meetings and telling people he dosnt even believe building 7 existed. And that "people mention this build 7" "but yet I have no proof it even existed" <Are you kidding me.....How about the fact that alquida Number 2 Leader has Dined at the Pentagon... Wasnt there also proof that they had special payed houseing and spending money...I could look back into that But im almost 100% sure they did. They were conducting the SAME drill of HIJACKERS jacking planes and flying them into the towers THE SAME DAY at the SAME TIME confuseing norad. Just like the London subway bombings, Same drill the same day...<That happens alot coincedently.
Loose Change-911 was an inside job.
I would like to answer the questions about how could It be a conspiracy SOOO many people from the office cleaner to the head ceo would have to be in on it....
How about the fact that the towers were closed down off and on for 5 days prior and repair men and Inspection units were allowed access to remote areas of the towers. BAM!!! I knew Id find this out....Its just like the Oklahoma city bombing >
YouTube - ‪Oklahoma City Bombing RARE footage‬‏ Dont you remember any of this LOL...then they said they were Training bombs...LOL I guess anything left over in any Government spocered terrorism that malfuctions is a Training bomb lol..
WTC security anomalies
A number of strange facts fall under the heading of WTC security anomalies.Among them:
? George W. Bush??s brother was a Director and his cousin was the CEO of the security fi rm responsible for the design of the electronic security network of the World Trade Center prior to and during 9/11;
? Numerous phone threats of bombs placed WTC on high alert in weeks prior to 9/11;
? Employees of WTC reported rare ??power-down? alerts in days leading up to 9/11 in which power was shut down to various fl oors for maintenance work, rendering security controls and video cameras inoperative; many workers were seen entering and leaving the buildings;
? At least one security guard at WTC reported the abrupt removal of explosive-sniffi ng dogs fi ve days prior to 9/11;
? John O??Neill quit his job as FBI counter terrorism expert in part because of obstruction of his investigations of al-Qaeda and became head of WTC security, starting in late August 2001; he was killed three weeks later in the attacks.
Demolition-like Collapse of WTC 1, 2, and 7
Of all the facts discussed in this survey, the nature of the collapse of three World Trade Center buildings ranks among the most signifi cant. There are several mysteries about these collapses:
? Never in the history of modern civilization has a steel-framed skyscraper collapsed due to fi re;
? How can Solid STEEL Structure melt in Open Air,it need very high temp.which is not possible in open air?there was mostly Smoke,smoke comes out,means fire not burning properly ;
? Solid Steel Structure building fall down in 16 mints of smoke burning ;strange ! fall down in 11 second.
? After Fall down,area was full with white dust ,from where it came;
? After Fall down;why No office items,where thery were?110 floor building,hundered of office?chair,computer,nothing was there ?..
? Before few years 6 hrs of Fire in WTC,no collapse,on that day 16 mintute of smoke with fire and bulding fall down.
? BOMBS were planted in building before 9/11.
? AFTER FALL DOWN , WHERE WAS THE CORE OF BOTH BUILDING ??????????
? The fi res in the buildings were much shorted-lived than other fi res that have damaged skyscrapers in the past;
? The World Trade Center buildings were built to very high standards; they were highly redundant structures intentionally designed to withstand the direct impact of a commercial jetliner and much larger fi res;
? Scores of fi refi ghters, police, workers, outside witnesses and journalists reported hearing explosive detonations throughout the buildings just before and during their collapse;
? There is clear visible evidence of ??squibs?? (demolition explosions) on the sides of the towers during their collapse;
? Towers 1 and 2 fell to the ground within one and three seconds of free-fall velocity, something that is physically impossible if the fl oors of the buildings are meeting??let alone overcoming??the resistance
of intact steel and concrete structure throughout their fall;
? The concrete of the towers is pulverized to a fi ne dust, something that would not occur if the fl oors of the towers simply ??pancaked? upon each other;
? The towers fell almost perfectly into their own footprints;
? The buildings had been transferred from public to private ownership only a few weeks earlier, and their new owner took out insurance that specifi cally included acts of terrorism. The case of World Trade Center 7 is most revealing:
? It was never struck by an airplane;
? The fi res inside (allegedly due to falling debris from the collapse of the other towers) were relatively small;
? It fell at exactly free-fall velocity; without controlled demolition this is impossible according to the laws of physics;
? It fell symmetrically into its footprint;
? Its owner is on videotape saying he suggested to fi re offi cials that the building be ??pulled???jargon for controlled demolition; shortly after that suggestion, it collapsed in precisely the manner of a controlled
demolition;
? It housed offices of the CIA and New York??s emergency management center, among others;
? Evidence of explosive compounds has been found in at least one of the few remaining pieces of once-molten iron that were not illegally destroyed;
The collapse of WTC 7 was never addressed by the 9/11 Commission.
These facts all bluntly confl ict with the offi cial theory of 9/11. These facts are completely consistent with controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2 and 7.
Resistance to 9/11 Investigations
In prior national crises, such as the attack on Pearl Harbor and the assassination of John F. Kennedy, investigations were empanelled within a matter of days. In the case of 9/11 the nation would have to wait a half-year for House-Senate hearings, more than a year for a formal investigation to commence,
and nearly three years for a fi nal report. The Commission closed on August 21st 2004.
President Bush and Vice President Cheney fought these hearings and investigations at every possible turn.
Many More Issue are there !if i will get time,i will publish it ,this article contain just WTC issue,not pentagon
Loose Change-911 was an inside job.
Many More Issue are there !if i will get time,i will publish it ,this article contain just WTC issue,not pentagon
>>>>>>>
Can you actually prove any of this? NO!
