Printable View
I think that the medical issue and research have opened peoples eyes to some of the benefits of cannabis. I think that the tobacco companies will come in and screw it all up for everyone. I'm voting no and advising my friends and family to do the same.:jointsmile:
its funny how everyone is saying tobacco comapanies are going to screw stuff up...one thing they are tobacco companies not marijuana companies..im going to laught if it doesnt go through and then laugh when people try to push another bill to go through and the people just laugh..
I REALLY REALLY HOPE THEY TAKE MEDICAL MARIJAUNA AWAY FROM EVERY STATE. and then see what happins...
you vote no means ur in it for making money plain and simple....
your retarted for voting no.because there may not be another chance to do so....get a job and make money the real way...
VOTE YES.AND AFTER IT GOES THROUGH THERE IS ALWAYS TIME TO MAKE CHANGES...
NA YOU KNOW WHAT VOTE NO SO THE GOVERMENT AND STATE SEES THAT LEGALIZING IT ISNT WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT!!
Just because you vote no doesn't mean you don't want legalization. Prop. 19 is a poorly written proposition and that's why I'm voting no. Why doesn't the state let us citizens have a hand in writing the legislation.:jointsmile:Quote:
Originally Posted by middieman440
Quote:
Originally Posted by middieman440
Yeah But your missing the point of his post and many others. Here I'll make it big and green for you to see.Quote:
Originally Posted by budlover13
Oh and btw Rep! You worded it so perfectly.Quote:
Originally Posted by middieman440
A poorly written law is NOT the best way to START. There are already too many badly written laws on California's books.
Prop 13 is a good example. It's a tax law that's been around for over 30 years. It was a bad reaction to governments bad practices. Now, we have businesses and big, big corporations that never get reassesed values because they never sell (such as Chevron, for example). It's an unintended consequence that the guy next door to me pays twice as much property taxes for the SAME HOUSE as I do. But hey, someone somewhere was probably saying "Hey, its a good start, we can tune it up later."
Never happened.
I don't need protectionism to insure my income stream. I don't mind competition. You wanna grow your own - go for it. You can't, or don't wanna - my stuff is going to be the best bang for the buck.
You wanna make your own whiskey, go ahead. It's legal. You wanna buy - I recommend Gentleman Jack. Your choice.
I just don't want the gov't to have more control than they already have - and believe me, this law is NOT going to be good for the cause. In ten years, some mealy mouthed politician will be able to say, "See? We tried. It doesn't work. We need to go back to making it illegal."
Unfortunately, I think it will get passed. Potheads are generally a stupid and slow witted lot - and I think it'll get passed. But, I will vote against it.
did anyone read section 4 there will be harder punnishmetts then before. just for smoking with say your younger sibling you can get 3 to 7 years in a state prision these new sets of laws are bull shit. keep it medical
what is the law right now in California for smoking marijuana with a minor? I'm just asking. anyone know? my bet is 3 to 7 years, or more.Quote:
Originally Posted by mountaingems
right? Who cares? Of course the law will get harsher. Adults will have access to MJ alot more frequently, so why wouldn't they increase the punishment? Seeing as how it may happen more often. Why would you want to smoke with minors anyways?Quote:
Originally Posted by boaz
Isn't everyone around the country just going to continue smoking as much as they do ???
Growers wont' stop growing....
Smokers won't stop smoking....
The government will be forced to put out a good product eventually because people won't go buying shwag joints from a shop........
So they won't make their money and try to act like it's our fault......
If the Gov ever admits it's faults on any issue in this country, then our country automatically becomes that much greater....
Why can't gov work WITH the people, instead of controlling us ?
We don't try to control them....we try to coexist with gov.....why can't they do the same.
Why can't they just BE