Printable View
Sandy, no you can't sue for a hippa violation dude, again, you got no clue what your doing or saying, you just run your mouth, go to the federal hippa cite and read for yourself, find me some caselaw proving me wrong dude, OH YOU CAN'T, GEEZE I WONDER WHY?? BECAUSE YOU CAN'T, THATS WHY!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by sandybarr
The PRA case..lol what they fuck do you know canna flim flam man.
My civil case has been won before it has started.I counted on them lying,set them up to lie and they did.Now we head to a civil trial in front of a jury with LEO admitting they work for the feds backed by the courts.What can they say now..we don't work for the feds..
Do you think I could have gotten their federal paper trail thru public disclosure..They would have hid those documents just like they hid the others.
Now I waltz into federal court in front of a jury and say here is how my state paid itself to work for the feds,and challenge the declaration of federal sovereignty.Please feel free to explain or forecast how the state gets out of this one.Explain with your expertise how they can pay themselves to declare a federal sovereignty.
What good would a civil suit have done without the complete we are federal-here is where we made ourselves federal documents.Do you think you could have gotten them smart guy.They would have sat on that stuff til hell froze over.I got them to hand it over with a complete description of how they pay themselves to be a federal sovereignty.They showed me where to fucking look.Couldnt have done it without them.Why could I do it..because I counted on lying bastards to lie.How is that for forecasting.
Now a jury is going to have a much different take on a federal declaration of sovereignty..particularly one that is not verified by the feds...It will be a wonderful trial with 39 multiple page exhibits that has the detail that is required to withstand immunity and summary judgement arguments.
Oh and this one will go all the way to the U.S. Supreme court if I have to.
I could care less about your THCF ramblings since I have little to worry about since it looks like a scarecrow in the field with a crow on his shoulder.
Zion, as for some of my posts, some of that info. came from this very cite right here, CANNABIS.COM, so what the fuck kind of non-surffer are you, one with blinders on, you don't follow anyone my ass dude, you don't even know whats on the cite you run your mouth on, just to slander a person attempting to educate patients in the real world of our laws... give me a break, how old are you 10 ??:thumbsup:
I filed a HIPPAA complaint and it was turned down because cannabiogen did not exist legally...period got the letter to prove it.They go into a regular Dr office with a license they take the case...period you fucking rambling scarecrow.
Go away and set some more bad precedence,maybe law enforcement and the criminal pot attorneys will send you a box of doughnuts.
I got a $1000,00 says you don't make it to any jury, much less the U.S. Supreme ct... LMAO.. our state has legislation stating they commingle and are allowed too....so do the feds, your in the WRONG PARK PLAYING FOOTSY WITH YOURSELF JOHN, I DO RESPECT YOU DUDE ,BUT YOUR GAME IS NOT ON CENTER BRO... SORRY MAN, CALLING IT FOR WHAT I SEE...AND KNOW... PLEASE DON'T SLANDER ME JOHN, YOU DON'T KNOW ME OR MY LEGAL BAT, YOU SHOWED ME YOURS, AND IT BROKE..Quote:
Originally Posted by sandybarr
SCARE CROWS ARE OK, TILL YOU GET SCARED BY ONE, OR REALIZE UPON A ACTUAL TOUCHING BY ONE, THAT YOU CHANGE YOUR MIND, LIKE YOU SAID, DEC.:thumbsup:
How about a litle fire scarecrow.lol
In December of 2006, a North Carolina Court of Appeals case highlighted another strong incentive for HIPAA compliance.
Although a private litigant has no private right of action under HIPAA, in Acosta v. Byrum, 638 S.E.2d 246 (N.C.App.) (December 19, 2006) the court found that a violation of duties owed under HIPAA constituted a negligent act. This means that private litigants can bring negligence actions based on a HIPAA violation even though they cannot directly recover for the HIPAA violation itself.
THAT'S MY POINT DUDE, YOU FILE SHIT WITHOUT RUNNING IT UP A FLAG POLE TO SEE IF IT FLYS FIRST....YOU JUST HOPE IN YOUR MIND IT DOES.... DOUGHNUTS I CAN'T EAT SOOOOORY, THEY ARE TOXIC TO ME, BUT THANKS FOR THE THOUGHT, BAD CASELAW I DON'T DO DUDE, THAT'S NOT IN MY REALITY OR LIFE... THAT APPEARS TO BE YOUR JOB, WE CAN READ IT ON THE WA. ST. CASE OPINIONS.. SEE ANYTHING WITH MY NAME ON IT?????? NOPE, CAUSE I DON'T ROLE LIKE THAT, I NEVER LOST A CASE IN MY LIFE... LAST TIME I WAS IN FEDERAL COURT ON A MEDICAL ISSUE, I WON $100,000. AND CLOSED THE NEW JERSEY MOB DOWN IN PORTLAND, OR., CAN YOU SAY CHEESE:D:thumbsup::pimp: LICK ME !!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by sandybarr
About your letter, they can i.e. the DOJ can and only them, not you dude, you mis-state your position every time, just like this here...this is why your going to loose every time...mumbo jumbo
Unpublished opinions do not create case law scarecrow.
And this proves my case, no fire john, just a lamp with a battery about to die from abuse....look up wa. caselaw on negligence and it's elements... now your precluded from argueing the same case of facts.. your burnt....Quote:
Originally Posted by sandybarr
In another circuit I would be using that for making case law in the ninth.This is moot because my money is going for getting the we are feds state in front of a jury.,not to get the movement leader and the navy Dr for HIPAA violations.
Sorry if I don't take your word for it.A jury is much different than a liberal clown judge with a history of not upholding the PRA.
Nice of you to stick up for the other side with one arm and the other arm fight for us patients.
Both arms look like they are stuffed with hay to me.It looks like the crow on your shoulder is dripping something.lol