7 reasons to support George W. Bush

I'm only 19 but common sense tells me several things:
1. Minimum wage is rediculous ($5.15 hr......wow)
2. Patriot Act (Big Brother is everywhere:()
3. Gas, enough said
4. War in middle east, cannabis being illegal....anyone seing something familiar? I think Big Brother has a problem of stepping up and telling it's citizens when they made a mistake....
5. National Debt
Don't get me wrong, on 9/12 I was right with everyone else, cursing "Towlheads" and saying we should invade the middle east and kick some ass, etc., but the truth is, everyday we stay in iraq, there will be more needless deaths oversees and our debt will just get more and more out of control. I don't know what should be done, but I sure hope we elect a leader next year that will know what to do....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by suhl

8. George W. Bush has a small penis.

:S2:

---

hahahahahahahahahahahah:clap::clap::dance::dance:: thumbsup::D

First, a lesson about Viet Nam to help the "history teacher" get a grip on the truth:

It's well known as fact that Eisenhower, a REPUBLICAN, sent the first US troops into Viet Nam to support the South Vietmnamese. In November, 1955, the Military Assistance Advisory Group was sent to train the South Vietnamese Army. The first of these advisors to die was in 1959.

You can see that the United States was already assisting and well invested into the war in NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE
NUMBER 63.1-3-55.

Second, I have to wonder how Kennedy almost started WW3... It was the Soviets who were sending nuclear missiles to Cuba. This was a violation of the United States, as it violated the Monroe Doctrine (Very well-known in US history), which was held as law and foreign policy - a presidential order, if you will.

Now, about the Iraq war...

Sure, Iraq violated the UN terms. BUT, the UN NEVER gave approval for ANY military action against Iraq. The US started a "war of aggression" on Iraq because of the lack of UN approval.

As a member of the UN, and a signatory to the Geneva Convention, when the President directed this war at Iraq, he made an OUTRIGHT violation of the US Constitution, and at the same time, became a WAR CRIMINAL.

He also violated the Constitution in the illegal wiretapping (already been determined to be illegal in several courts) program which illegally spies on US citizens.

Now, I'm not a republican, or a democrat. I'm registered independent, and I do vote, but only for those who would be able to lead. If there were Presidents worse than Bush, they have not been alive during my lifetime. They have not done so much damage to the international credibility of the US, as Bush has, and they have not killed as many innocent people as Bush has (Illegally) done in the past seven years.
I wish that there was one thing he's done that worked as he said it would, or that helped the country of the United Staes, as a whole. But there isn't...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Humboldt215

I saw a post earlier today in the main forum about how much "LOVE" is on this site and fellowship.

Apparently its only if you follow the political views of the outspoken.

Isnt this 'America' where you can say and believe what you want without repercussion?

Damn, I thought it was :mad:

Guess I was wrong.


.. if I had the same political views would you not buy my nugs from the local cannabis center?

---

I think people just get angry when they've been shit upon so freely by a President that wasn't even elected by the people...These same people get angry when someone, obviously misled, supports this kind of a President. It makes people even angrier knowing someone like this is going to be a history teacher...Being spied on (which was unconstitutional...this issue has gone to court. I haven't been able to keep up on this story, but hopefully the judge makes the right decision) also pisses people off. No child left behind pisses people off. The war in Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, but without 9/11 there would have been no war. That pisses people off, including soldiers that thought they were fighting for a reason, only to find out that reason was bullshit. Seems like everyone is pissed except for those that only watch fox news, msnbc, etc...That doesn't only piss the soldiers off. That pisses off other people. I could go on more about foreign policy, the patriot act, America's current economic situation, treatment of the troops, etc, but why do that when It wouldn't change the mind of a Bush supporter? I think Bush could personally go to Iraq to eat civilian Iraqi children live on TV, and Bush supporters would remain Bush supporters. I mean, he's pretty much done more against the general American public...

This thread reminds me, a history teacher I had in high school told the class I was a liar when I said Hoover was a crossdresser. Just thought I'd get that off my chest.

Also, a ton of troops are coming back with medical problems and nobody to help. Turns out, branches of the military refuse to pay for their treatment....good job huh?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maik

First, a lesson about Viet Nam to help the "history teacher" get a grip on the truth:

It's well known as fact that Eisenhower, a REPUBLICAN, sent the first US troops into Viet Nam to support the South Vietmnamese. In November, 1955, the Military Assistance Advisory Group was sent to train the South Vietnamese Army. The first of these advisors to die was in 1959.

You can see that the United States was already assisting and well invested into the war in NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE
NUMBER 63.1-3-55.

Second, I have to wonder how Kennedy almost started WW3... It was the Soviets who were sending nuclear missiles to Cuba. This was a violation of the United States, as it violated the Monroe Doctrine (Very well-known in US history), which was held as law and foreign policy - a presidential order, if you will.

Now, about the Iraq war...

Sure, Iraq violated the UN terms. BUT, the UN NEVER gave approval for ANY military action against Iraq. The US started a "war of aggression" on Iraq because of the lack of UN approval.

As a member of the UN, and a signatory to the Geneva Convention, when the President directed this war at Iraq, he made an OUTRIGHT violation of the US Constitution, and at the same time, became a WAR CRIMINAL.

He also violated the Constitution in the illegal wiretapping (already been determined to be illegal in several courts) program which illegally spies on US citizens.

Now, I'm not a republican, or a democrat. I'm registered independent, and I do vote, but only for those who would be able to lead. If there were Presidents worse than Bush, they have not been alive during my lifetime. They have not done so much damage to the international credibility of the US, as Bush has, and they have not killed as many innocent people as Bush has (Illegally) done in the past seven years.
I wish that there was one thing he's done that worked as he said it would, or that helped the country of the United Staes, as a whole. But there isn't...

---

I can see it now "Oh yeah, class, Clinton caused 9/11 when he got a bj from a fattie intern, and World War II happened because of a cripple DUMB-O-crat! Thats the history lesson for today. Now, do any of you children feel left behind?"

lol dumb-o-crat

Yes you caught me, I must be a complete idiot for having a different view than 90 some percent of people here. No need for the ridicule.

If you dont agree fine, but don't act like a jerk about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rebgirl420

Yes you caught me, I must be a complete idiot for having a different view than 90 some percent of people here. No need for the ridicule.

If you dont agree fine, but don't act like a jerk about it.

---

It wasn't personal, in fact i was thinking of this man: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/wp...-dailyshow.jpg

Remember: "Truthiness.....Now I'm sure some of the Word Police, the wordanistas over at Webster's, are gonna say, 'Hey, that's not a word.' Well, anybody who knows me knows that I'm no fan of dictionaries or reference books. They're elitist. Constantly telling us what is or isn't true, or what did or didn't happen. Who's Britannica to tell me the Panama Canal was finished in 1914? If I wanna say it happened in 1941, that's my right. I don't trust books. They're all fact, no heart."

haha well, I guess id rather be like Colbert if I had the choice:thumbsup:

most importantly, President Bush has moved the 'Theater of Operations', (war-zone), from downtown New York City, to downtown Baghdad ... war is truly 'hell', and it's best to have 'hell' situated elsewhere, whenever possible ... :smokin: