help me im pissed

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JeenYuss

technically since i am one of the people that the tests are biased against, wouldnt that mean i have an even higher I.Q. than 140?

please do not try starting an argument over anything this unimportant when you are completely clueless about the situation

---

takes two to argue ya know? oh and btw, pixel's right, in this day and age those tests mean jack-shit... lol

key word "starting"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JeenYuss

to the kid that can roll a perfect J and has never smoked you are a disgrace to the human race and i would advise you to get castrated so that your genes never again swim in the gene pool

thank you

---

soooo... it's ok for you to try and start an argument, but not for anyone else? i mean.... that is a pretty negative statement.... no good could really come of that statment.... judging by your name, and statements thus far, you're some 'know-it-all' kid that thinks he's high and mighty.... well time to fall off your horse there little buddy :thumbsup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho

soooo... it's ok for you to try and start an argument, but not for anyone else? i mean.... that is a pretty negative statement.... no good could really come of that statment.... judging by your name, and statements thus far, you're some 'know-it-all' kid that thinks he's high and mighty.... well time to fall off your horse there little buddy :thumbsup:

---

maybe no good could come from that statement... doesnt mean its not completely true

and "thus far" ... the key word in that statement u jus made i beleive is "judging"

but btw most of your judgements were somewhat along the lines of being accurate

but anyways here goes
an explanation of my original statement

a 16 year old whos dad smokes mad weed, he can roll a perfect J supposedly, etc.

how can you possibly not know how to smoke? its sum extremely simple logic if you ask me an i beleive anybody who ... fuck

dont know how to smoke a J = extremely stupid
that statement should be accurate, or at least real close

i dont want all the dumb people reproducing and multiplying spreading their dumb genes etc.

high people im alright with, but just plain dumb people?
thats all i have to say on the matter

suck the joint till u cant suck it no more then take a breath in

or simply watch your dad next time he smokes.

if you are inhaling it correctly then you probably have not rolled it correctly, is the cherry (red bit at the end) getting brighter when you take a toke if not then thats your problem, its not air tight and needs to be re rolled

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JeenYuss

technically since i am one of the people that the tests are biased against, wouldnt that mean i have an even higher I.Q. than 140?

---

haha..wow imo, reading that post makes me think that your IQ is significantly less than 140...hopefully some others see the humor in this also. but anyway, i'm not trying to start anymore arguments, that's not necessary. anyway, to the guy who can't get high, just hit either a bong or a pipe man...keep ripping til you cough...while you're coughing you'll be wishing that you hadn't have ripped it so hard...that's a good thing, i promise.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LIP

Raelly really high,... and personally i concider the age to be responcible as 16. I think anyone younger than that isnt really old enough, and that doesnt mean their value isnt counted, but because they are only young, they dont really have much real life experience and because of that they say either stupid things when they;re not needed or they're bias because they dont understand, and sometimes too stubborn, but adults are aswell.

---

this can be true.

however, i'm 14 and have only posted things i belive to be helpful to others. I would also consider myself to have a decent sized knowledge of cannabis, and other simmilar topics.

but, i must admit that i started too early (at 11) and i probably was at one point fitting the mold of the annoying kids

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KottonMouthKid

this can be true.

however, i'm 14 and have only posted things i belive to be helpful to others. I would also consider myself to have a decent sized knowledge of cannabis, and other simmilar topics.

but, i must admit that i started too early (at 11) and i probably was at one point fitting the mold of the annoying kids

---

I also started when i was 11, and i think that was too early. 16 is a good age.

I was an annoying little fuck, well, in some ways i still am but at the mo it's amplified cos i have no tobacco cos i quit, but i just hate reading some of the stuff kids post on here, and tbh, 99% of it IS from kids, although most of the teenagers on this site are fine, like yourself and orangeman among others.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LIP

I also started when i was 11, and i think that was too early. 16 is a good age.

I was an annoying little fuck, well, in some ways i still am but at the mo it's amplified cos i have no tobacco cos i quit, but i just hate reading some of the stuff kids post on here, and tbh, 99% of it IS from kids, although most of the teenagers on this site are fine, like yourself and orangeman among others.

---

I think that this is very true.

Cannabis while hardly a drug does still alter ones mind to a certain extent. And at a younger age it makes people flip shit. I've relised that i started way to early, and even still, i'd say that i'm a little early.

I think the reason that me and orangeman (and numerous others) don't yip and post pointless shit is because it bothers us just as much as you guys when that happens