September 11, 2001 "Insider's Job"... Bush's own staff admit it was a inside job!!!

that shit is just sick no matter how it happened or why.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gumby

I have no Idea who was behind it and who did what... but I am sure that explosives were used to make all three WTC buildings fall. I saw Loose Change first, and then went to Alex Jones stuff and must say it could be as wrong as Bush is about terrorists with box cutters. Both seem equally insane to me, but after watching the 2 hour lecture and then the Eye Witness video, I 100% believe that explosives were used.

---

If you've ever seen footage of a building imploded with explosives, the collapse of the 3 WTC buildings were exactly the same.

I don't know who did it or why they did it, but I just know that it wasn't done to increase freedom in this country. Just read the newspaper. We are sounding more like the former Soviet Union every day: Secret Police, warrantless searches, authorized torture, people being jailed without due process, public surveillance through the use of video cameras, data mining, wiretapping, religious persecution, the list goes on and on.

I know. I was in East Germany before the Wall came down (just visiting, thank God).

It takes WEEKS to plant the C4 to demolish a building... The towers were populated 24/7 yet no one saw the planting of said explosive. The buildings were so massive that it would have taken a two man crew months to do so, and who the fuck isn't going to see a guy walking around with plastic explosive in your office. Pentagon inside job? Maybe. But the towers were brought down by planes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hunternora

It takes WEEKS to plant the C4 to demolish a building... The towers were populated 24/7 yet no one saw the planting of said explosive. The buildings were so massive that it would have taken a two man crew months to do so, and who the fuck isn't going to see a guy walking around with plastic explosive in your office. Pentagon inside job? Maybe. But the towers were brought down by planes.

---

since you havent divulged that deeply in the statements released
by those close to this incident:
there were periods right b4 the towers collapsed,
which they shut down groups of floors at a time [ie. 30-40]. covering most of the building
the reason was "maintenance purposes", supposedly to do w/
upgrading bandwidth-which would mean going into the walls

one guy was fixing his companies computers after ^^ this maintenance b/c
ALL THE ELECTRICITY WAS SHUT OFF, including security cameras,
so he spent days fixing it so that company get get on track, finishes Sept 10th,
next day comes along, it's his break day, and what does he see?

those w/ statements, and have worked in the WTC for awhile,
said it was a very unusual closing of the floors

wtc 1 and 2 had security and surveillance shutdowns and more than usual evacuation drills in the weeks prior...that's not even important though, there's much stronger evidence pointing to inside job...as opposed to 19 freedom hating hijackers who weren't the radical fundamentalist muslims we were led to believe they were, and who didn't know how to fly.

Many convincing arguements for an inside job have been posted here.

In the video when the closer tower goes down, I saw a few explosions occur on the lower floors. Is that just me?

no watch the 9/11 eyewitness video... it slows it down and gets the sound in the back ground as well.. it zooms in on the smaller explosions and shows the choppers that flew over and set them off...

What I want to know is why do so many people take time to think of how the offical story maked sense yet won't take 20 minutes to look at information that shows them what they asked... not you minnesota, but Hunter...

I mean there is a ton of information out there about the closing off of the WTC and even the removal of bomb sniffing dogs...It scares me that people are willing to defend something they are not sure about and will defend it without looking into any further information about what happened... I mean in my signature there is over 5 hours of video with all the information andone could need about the Sept 11th attacks... yet people will spend hours and hours picking apart the consiracy theort rather than find information to defnd their beliefs...

"Liberals love osama Bin Laden"

Lol, sometimes conservaties DO hit the nail on the head. While of course I think 9-11 was an inside job, let's not go too far off the crazy-train here guys and forget that Islamic fundamentalism does exist in today's world. Like it or not, all the evidence points to it playing a major, major role in 9-11.

To sum it up, I agree with all of you up 'till the point where you exclude Islamic terrorism from being a reality in the world today. Because it's out there, and it's what fuels this corrupt administration to do the things it does every day as it's scapegoat.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by minnesota man

Many convincing arguements for an inside job have been posted here.

In the video when the closer tower goes down, I saw a few explosions occur on the lower floors. Is that just me?

---

No, it isn't just you. When the 2nd tower goes down (on the Eyewitness Video), I think I can actually see tiny explosions that coincide with the muffled "boom" sounds...

But being the skeptic (though not necessarily the most intelligent one) that I am, some things that I'm wondering:

-I know next to nothing re: explosives and stuff like that...IF the gov't really wanted to bring down the towers with explosives, would they really need choppers to set it off? I dunno....in this age of tech, I'd thought that they'd be able to do this from a more remote distance.

-And speaking of choppers...Is the video implying that ALL of those helicopters were flying over the towers just to detonate the explosives? I thought there were some eyewitness accounts of people saying that they were looking at the police choppers flying over and NOT rescuing people. Also, I think "Loose Change" provided some close-up footage of the towers shortly after the plane crashed into it...Wasn't that shot from news choppers?

-And one more thing that I'm wondering...If the gov't really wanted to do this, what is the point of having the planes crash into the tower and THEN use the explosives? Why not simply just use the explosives and then create the story the hijackers had planted bombs....instead of using explosives in the basement (as the theory goes) and hope that clean-up workers don't find the mystery "hot spots of molten steel"? See what I'm saying? Why use the planes?

I'll finish watching the 2nd half of "Eyewitness" later. Very interesting though, thanks for the link.

Planes make it all seem plausible... think about how impossible it would be to say terrorists rigged 3 buildings with explosives... let alone 2 of the biggest buildings in the US. That would take days of set-up inside the WTC which would obviously be noticed, and they would have to be EXPERT demolition men to make it collapse as perfectly as it did. By running planes into the target, it makes the puzzle pieces fit together. At least that's what they want us to believe. Yesterday a Marine was at my cousins house for mother's day and I told him all about the information I have read up on and he said it wouldn't surprise him if it was set-up, governments have been doing it since the beginning of time. He also posed this question too me... "There are a lot of places in this world FAR more dangerous and an immediate risk then Iraq ever was, do you think we'd really be there if they didn't have oil?".