best "theory"?Quote:
Originally Posted by king kong bong
2 planes fuckin crashed in these towers
we call that terrorism
it was planned since years
wtf is this lol
Printable View
best "theory"?Quote:
Originally Posted by king kong bong
2 planes fuckin crashed in these towers
we call that terrorism
it was planned since years
wtf is this lol
Aircraft did hit the tower that day. They were 767's, and not 747's. I don't believe Bush set this up himself, but I do think he knew about it way in advance, and did nothing. And why were all the Jews told not to go to work in the towers on that day?
A lot of fuel would have been lost before the aircraft penetrated the building, but all the fuel in the centre tank (in the fuselage) would have gone into the building. The problem is that standard procedure is to fill the wing tanks first, then the centre tanks, but they usually fill the centre tanks up to balance the aircraft, and there was also a scare where running the fuel pumps on an empty tank will cause the tank to explode because of the flammable vapour in there.
I don't know where these aircraft were originally supposed to be flying to???
Airlines calculate exactly how much fuel is needed for a flight, taking into account wind direction, temperature, altitude and load. They carry extra fuel for a 45 minute diversion. If these were domestic flights then there would have been hardly any fuel in there.
On the subject of high-rise buildings, there have been many fires in China involving tall buildings. Some have collapsed due to heat softening the steel.
There was an incident here many years ago that involved a gas explosion in a block of council flats. It happened high up, but brought all the floors above and below down like a pack of cards. It was a design fault of the building, and despite the firm claiming how safe these buildings were, all gas was banned in council flats for many years.
My favourite conspiracy is the one involving the Pentagon. As there is no footage showing a 757 hitting the building, and no evidence of a plane.
9/11 happened. Its time to move on.
my thoughts exactlyQuote:
Originally Posted by Synthesizer Man
that's quite possibly the most paranoid american theory i've heard yet. the explosion of jet fuel had enough power to take down the buildings. many people think that because of the buildings architectural stand-point, that the building should have atleast still been standing, but it's because of the way it's built that it collapsed.Quote:
Originally Posted by king kong bong
This thread got FUUUUUCKKK K upppppedddd...Question...Why were top pentagon officials warn not to fly on 911.
Why was Mayor Willy Brown & Salman Rushdie warn not to fly on 911(LOOK IT UP).
Why was the guy that wired $100,000 dollars to 911 hijacker Mohamned Atta, having breakfast with U.S. Government official(look it up,this really happen).
Why was the Bin-laden family allowed to fly out of America on 911 without being interrogated first.(look it up)
Why was Bush wanting to limited the congressional investigation into 911.
How did Osama Bin Forgotten able to make NORAD to stand down on 911.(look it up)
Why did they(FBI) take the Security Videos from the hotel & gas station that were facing the pentagon.(look it up)
Larry Silverstien the owner of the WTC said on PBS that they pulled building 7.(look it up)
Bush thwarted the FBI from investigating Bin-laden b4 911.
Why did Our govt ignore all the warnings about a terrorist attack about to occur on US soil.(look it up)
Why on Sept 7 2001, did Mr. Jeb Bush feel the need to sign an executive order NO. 01-261(look it up)allowing him to declear martial law in the state of Florida?
Why was bush blocking independent investigators to examine the wreckage of AA flight 77
How about them five Israelis that were arrested on 911.
Why did bush lie about seeing the first plane hit when no video showed up until later....
Like I said i dont care..I was just wondering since you all know everything about everything you all can help me out with these questions.....
if the two towers wasn't setup then how did so many people film it?
because there's countless ferries running tourist trips around it. not to mention there's.... let see..... about 6 or 7 people in that area of new york.Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rdEyeVision
are you the fucking secret service?!?! get the hell out of here, snitch!Quote:
Originally Posted by Irnman
NO**30...Homeland Security!---wanna join? www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/economy & link up to applicationsQuote:
Originally Posted by Ganj
You know, I am 50/50 on all this shit. Now I don't post much anymore, I just listen now, but this debate has become hot and I will post my opinion....
1. I believe it was real becuz it looked real enuff and the bombs story would play out proportionally right. Secondly, why in gods FUCK would the U.S. (yes, even Bush) kill thousands of innocent people just to "find the guy that did it"????
2. I beleive it was fake becuz the "side-stories" are very believeable and maybe Sadam and Bush "made a deal" in which Bush took down the towers (maybe becuz of population or taxes, not to mention all the illegal communication and proccessing that not even the gov. could handle. And so Bush blamed it on Saddam to ensure cover-up for the public (with Saddam) and to give him many years and finally sentence him into the prison for life situation or else they would interfere anyways and sentence him to death. I mean c'mon, even Saddam isn't stupid enuff to fucking be SO SO cautious and all of a sudden fucking end up in a goddamn dirthole. He isn't stupid enuff to do that. Even if the enemy just spots u ur fucked bcuz the only way to go is up---towards the guns.
Those r my 2 cents. As you can see, I beleive it was fake. If it was not Bush, then maybe I would change my mind.............
And please realize I don't base my opinion purely on Bush....