Printable View
...i said the building had to have been loaded with explosives before 9/11 in order to pull it on 9/11...
you can't set that up in 8 hours...it was only on fire for a few hours, and the building was in no danger of collapsing. steel buildings can burn for days and not collapse.
it obviously wasn't wired for collapse that day.
you can't decide...hmmm, i'm going to blow up my building today, it can take weeks...it contradicts the feds' official conspiracy theory of fire made it fall.
Sure you can. Especially with a building that's already mostly gutted by fire. The part that takes the most time is the permits and clearance - but this is not necessary in an emergency. The FDNY made the final decision to blow the building, since they believed it was a danger. Whether it was or not is immaterial at this point. Someone had to make the decision on the fly, and they did.
the building wasn't gutted by fire...not even close.
firefighters who were there are on the record saying the building wasn't a threat...it was only a few small fires...
pictures of the building show that.
and wouldn't there have been a whole scene full of people getting this building ready to come down in just a few hours? the process takes much longer than that.
unless you have documentation saying the building was wired that day to be brought down...
Beeblebrox where IS your head? Have you even SEEN what building 7 looked like? It was a perfectly fine building with a fire that looks like a regular one! No explosions and nothing hit it! It was the furthest building away and wasnt hit by anything! Building 7 was in danger of collapsing!???!Quote:
Originally Posted by Beeblebrox.420
I dont care what you say about the towers pentagon or whatever but how can you NOT look at building 7 and say that was bullshit? honestly?
Nah, a crew of 9 or 10 guys can wire up and bring down a building that size within 8 hours easily, in a pinch. I've known some demo guys and they could definitely have pulled it off. Besides, in order to blow a building, walls, floors and ceilings have to be opened to expose beams and support members to attach the shaped charges to. A fairly considerable amount of internal demolition work must be accomplished manually prior to setting the explosives. There would have been some evidence of this type of work in the days preceeding the explosion, if your theory were to be correct.
I'm not a fire investigator nor a structural engineer. Are you? No? Ok, then. In that case, you're only talking out of your ass. Buildings can LOOK fine, yet be in imminent danger of collapse.Quote:
Originally Posted by nicholasstanko
there have been raging infernos in modern steel buildings that last for days...and the buildings don't collapse...but the feds want you to believe fire made it collapse in a perfectly symettrical fashion.
building 7 was in no danger of collapse...it's absurd to say it was. a 47 story reinforced steel building...no way it was going to collapse from a few fires.
and you don't just call up 9 or 10 guys to blow up your 47 story building in the middle of many other buildings...you call in controlled demolition or another giant company that does that stuff.
this is stuff that's on the history channel and discovery channel...you can't do that in a mere few hours.
Yes, that's the normal process. I am aware of what's involved. In an emergency situation, however, it can be accomplished much more quickly. It only takes a few hundred pounds of HE - usually PETN or a similar material - to bring down a building of that size. Shaped charges cut steel support members, while larger charges are loaded into concrete load-bearing structures. Properly timed, these charges pancake the building down on itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by pisshead
unless u were there ya know squat.
bottomline