this proves what i was saying in my last post above lmao...Quote:
Originally Posted by jtsik330
Printable View
this proves what i was saying in my last post above lmao...Quote:
Originally Posted by jtsik330
agreed the only way this will ever change is war sad to say but true.these fucks in power know the only way they can keep it is by keeping there boot on the back of our necks. look at copenheagen last month they were trying there best to fuck us all with this bs carbon tax.whats odd is alot of growers/mmj users agree with the gov on this issue.meanwhile there pumping there rooms full of co2 lmao funny crazy shit huh?lmao to funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShastaCoMan
carbon/co2 is what makes the earth thrive basicly anyone that believes this then believes that we"humans"are a plague and we should just be killed as everytime we take a breath were killing the world.funny thing tho when i was in school anyways i was taught co2 was great for the earth as the more that is produced the better/quicker/stronger plants grow inturn letting us thrive.
ps hey you obama freaks what happened to obama promising not to raise taxes on peeps that make under 250k a yr? what do you think this carbon tax will do??wake up people really...
that asshole promised alot of shit he didnt follow thru with, why do you think his approval rating is now lower than any other president. even his own "people" are turning against him..,......
It doesn't matter it's too late, the damage is done.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShastaCoMan
got that right.........
got to be careful though in whats said, i saw a thing on the tv the other day about someone who said something cockeyed about obama , and homeland security showed up on his front step.......
I personally believe one of the bigger reasons Obama won was because he had help for the new generation..
Those who just turned 18 and otherwise wouldn't care to vote for "some old un-cool guy to be president".
However, this time around they see then younger Black guy as a candidate and with the huge hiphop influence nowadays they automatically Dubb this Black candidate as "cool" and "hip" without even knowing what policies he supports or any of that stuff.
Just like multitudes of Black people voted for him just because he was black..
How do I know this?
Because you can go out and ask a handful of black people who voted for him what policies they agreed with Obama about for them to want to vote for him and I guarantee you 8 out of 10 won't have a clue of what your talking about..
Not to mention MTV and BET were BOTH going balls out encouraging people to vote when in previous years the focus wasn't even 1/10 as much as it was for this one.
Basically you can thank the young people and mostly minorities for electing this moron into office. I'm not saying white people didn't vote for them because I know plenty did but the majority wasn't.
I'm not trying to give off a racism vibe because surely a few people everywhere are QUICK to call you racist if you speak about black people and are not black, i'm just speaking facts.
i dont see it as racist at all. personally, i wouldnt give a rats ass if a 3ft 2 headed black/mexican/oriental mix as long as they actually DID what a presidents supposed to, as our founding fathers expected they would.
go out and ask afircan americans?...why?...CNN themselves asked a bunch right on the street why they voted for obama. every single one of them said they voted for him, most of them FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER, just to get a black in office as president. alot of them didnt even agree with his views, and stated they would vote for the "right" candidate NEXT TIME, but they wanted to break the "ice" so t speak, get "their" foot in the door ( as blacks) and next time vote for the issues not because of the candidates skin color.
pastor manning? he said just what the law stated and fbi,cia,homeland security and so on showed up at his door.they are making it to where most people are scared to say anything cause if they do they might get a visit.lmao yea that will go over well with the wrong person.and when it does they label that person or group terrorists.go look up waco texas on youtube and watch what really went down,or ruby ridge.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShastaCoMan
not to worry they'll step on the wrong toes 1 day soon.......
he acts more like a movie star than a prez.look at how many ads he's in.he's taken more vactions in such a short time it's crazy.there now talking about giving the banks another 4 trillion.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShastaCoMan
i'll tell you what there doing,there cooking the books wallstreet is a joke.dow can't go up and obama get on the air saying everything is a ok.when the jobless rate is still climbing.and it's higher than 11%.no jobs =not enough work for the company to higher back the people they let go=verylil product being sold=dow bs.
they are bankrupting us on purpose this is'nt a fluke.they know americans won't go for say nwo,nau,or new money.they have to take us to our knees in order to get most to comply.
+ to many odd things are happening anyone hear about china's army coming in by the boat and train loads into cali? not only troops but all there gear,tanks,troop carriers,so on as if they are here to take over?there running drills day and nite and marking everywhere they go with gps?i wonder why?
hear about the head of northcom saying obama told him to build his troops up to 1mil in states alone cause there will be a war break out here by end of winter?
they are gearing up for something big.....
they are trying to cook the books as long as they can trying to buy themselfs time.cause they know that once the people see the truth and how bad it really is hell will break loose. notice how they are sugar coating everything???
it's so great huh obama fans?gov fans?have u read any of it? i think not,what about this? odd nobody is talking about this anywhere in the news???
1001
â?¢HR 3200 IH
1 â??â??(B) isâ??
2 â??â??(i) a class III device; or
3 â??â??(ii) a class II device that is implantable,
4 life-supporting, or life-sustaining.
5 â??â??(2) In developing the registry, the Secretary shall,
6 in consultation with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs,
7 the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
8 Services, the head of the Office of the National Coordi9
nator for Health Information Technology, and the Sec10
retary of Veterans Affairs, determine the best methods
11 forâ??
12 â??â??(A) including in the registry, in a manner con13
sistent with subsection (f), appropriate information
14 to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by
15 type, model, and serial number or other unique iden16
tifier;
17 â??â??(B) validating methods for analyzing patient
18 safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and
19 for linking such data with the information included
20 in the registry as described in subparagraph (A), in21
cluding, to the extent feasible, use ofâ??
22 â??â??(i) data provided to the Secretary under
23 other provisions of this chapter; and
24 â??â??(ii) information from public and private
25 sources identified under paragraph (3);
VerDate Nov 24 2008 01:43 Jul 15, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 01001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3200.IH H3200 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
1002
â?¢HR 3200 IH
1 â??â??(C) integrating the activities described in this
2 subsection withâ??
3 â??â??(i) activities under paragraph (3) of sec4
tion 505(k) (relating to active postmarket risk
5 identification);
6 â??â??(ii) activities under paragraph (4) of sec7
tion 505(k) (relating to advanced analysis of
8 drug safety data); and
9 â??â??(iii) other postmarket device surveillance
10 activities of the Secretary authorized by this
11 chapter; and
u read 9?????? notice the 3 iii? notice above there is no iii?notice how it says"surveillance"?? oh theres more.
â??â??(D) providing public access to the data and
13 analysis collected or developed through the registry
14 in a manner and form that protects patient privacy
15 and proprietary information and is comprehensive,
16 useful, and not misleading to patients, physicians,
17 and scientists.
18 â??â??(3)(A) To facilitate analyses of postmarket safety
19 and patient outcomes for devices described in paragraph
20 (1), the Secretary shall, in collaboration with public, aca21
demic, and private entities, develop methods toâ??
22 â??â??(i) obtain access to disparate sources of
23 patient safety and outcomes data, includingâ??
24 â??â??(I) Federal health-related electronic
25 data (such as data from the Medicare pro-
VerDate Nov 24 2008 01:43 Jul 15, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 01002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3200.IH H3200 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
1003
â?¢HR 3200 IH
1 gram under title XVIII of the Social Secu2
rity Act or from the health systems of the
3 Department of Veterans Affairs);
4 â??â??(II) private sector health-related
5 electronic data (such as pharmaceutical
6 purchase data and health insurance claims
7 data); and
8 â??â??(III) other data as the Secretary
9 deems necessary to permit postmarket as10
sessment of device safety and effectiveness;
11 and
12 â??â??(ii) link data obtained under clause (i)
13 with information in the registry.
14 â??â??(B) In this paragraph, the term â??dataâ?? refers to in15
formation respecting a device described in paragraph (1),
16 including claims data, patient survey data, standardized
17 analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of
18 data from disparate data environments, electronic health
19 records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the
20 Secretary.
for the ones that see nothing wrong with this just know this is being drawn up as if we need this to help keep track of our health.that alone is wrong in it's self being forced to do anything is.but read it good notice how u see lil key words and pharses? read down here from 17 on?? oh it gets better it's ok i'll do the research for ya k?>>>>>>>>>>>>>
. Required coverage, or the so-called individual mandate: American citizens and legal residents would be required to have health insurance or pay a fine. For an individual, the fine would be $750 per year or 2% of household income, whichever is greater. For a family, the maximum fine would be $2,250 per year or 2% of household income
3. Government-run health insurance, or the so-called public option: There is no public option in the Senate bill.
The House bill would establish a government-run insurer that would compete with private insurers
notice what it says in red?hummmm i thought this was to help people not go in biz? notice how they have yet to give any price range for this coverage? notice how it says COMPETE???? i can bet that it's not going to be a helping hand up for our health but rather big gov wanting to get in on the action.and all these people cheering for it talking about how it's about time for america to have free coverage,thats a hoot.talking about how it's about time gov steps in to fix all the price hikes and rip offs from the ins sector.lmao just wait you will find out soon enough that this is not to help anyone this is a way to gain total control of you and to dig deeper into your pockets.