Schapelle Corby

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SteveV

The lack of sympathy here is obvious. That's fine: you have to address with your own consiences about that.

---

While there may be some people here who don't have any sympathy for her, I do have some and there may be others but I don't think anyone here has as much sympathy as you do. They aren't bad people if they don't and I'm sure every one here will sleep well with no guilty conscious.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SteveV

Equally however, making statements like "She broke international Law" - that is opinion not fact. I, and many many others, believe her to be innocent.

---

Ok, she was found guilty of drug trafficing. That's a fact.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SteveV

She did not get a proper trial. They burned the evidence.

---

Thank God someone burned the pot. :S2::rasta:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SteveV

I will also continue to ask questions about the real motives of those who aren't just passive in their anti-Schapelle opinion, but are actively seeking to cause further hurt and pain, to her and her family.

---

You have got to be kidding right? I know you can't be serious that this discussion is causing her family and her more pain? Does she get internet in jail? Is her family aware of this site? Even so, I'm sure they have heard all this before. The trama this must be causing....It's enough to have to light up a joint!

Lucky Schapelle Corby and lucky Renae Lawrence, they got 3 and 4 months (respectively) off their 20 year sentences for drug smuggling to celebrate Indonesian Independence Day.



Others weren't so lucky... Scott Rush, Myuran Sukumaran and Andrew Chan didn't get a present because they have been sentenced to die and nobody gets presents on death row. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SteveV

However, there is a difference between not supporting her, and campaigning zealously against her. It is the latter that I find so utterly disgusting and appalling.

Equally however, making statements like "She broke international Law" - that is opinion not fact. I, and many many others, believe her to be innocent.

I will also continue to ask questions about the real motives of those who aren't just passive in their anti-Schapelle opinion, but are actively seeking to cause further hurt and pain, to her and her family.

---

Really?! "We are campaigning zealously:S4:" against her by responding to YOUR campaign for her? News flash, YOU dont know that she isn't a smuggler any more than we do know...and again, you have yet to answer the question poised to you about what gave you the right to say that THAT countries laws are unjust? Then why did she do it? Or be in the position to be accused of it?
You are just as guilty of a "zealot" as you are accusing people....
Leave it alone...
Your cause is dead here...
take diashi's advice, and go get some smugglers sympathy, your not getting ours....
WT

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FakeBoobsRule

Ok, she was found guilty of drug trafficing. That's a fact.

---

Nearly there. She was found guilty of a drug trafficing offence via a disgraceful show trial, rather than a fair trial. She never had a chance.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FakeBoobsRule

I know you can't be serious that this discussion is causing her family and her more pain.

---

What is causing them pain are those who collectively smear and libel them, time and time again. Those who conduct the most vicious nasty campaign against them.

Mrs Corby's daughter is suffering horribly: and we have people attacking her, abusing her, and making up downright lies.

That is sickening and vile.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SteveV

That is sickening and vile.

---

Shit man you dont get it....LEAVE if you dont like it. But next time YOU post something on a forum, YOU should get ready for some responses that are both for and against your "zealot" cause....
WT

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SteveV

She never had a chance.

---

Where on earth could anyone turn up at customs with this in their luggage and not go to jail for 20 years?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sarah louise

Where on earth could anyone turn up at customs with this in their luggage and not go to jail for 20 years?

---

The venimous vile campaign continues.... just won't let it go. It's extremely ugly.

Back to the motive again... what makes someone do this? What makes them go after someone suffering so much already?


BTW: 20 years for a few pounds of dope? Only dodgy regimes do that. Especially on the back of a show trial, with a so-called judge who had never acquitted a defendent in over 500 drug cases. And I could go on and on, but some people's hatred of Schapelle makes them blind to facts like these.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SteveV

Back to the motive again... what makes someone do this?

---

Does a credible website have an about page like this?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sarah louise

Does a credible website have an about page like this?

---

Credible? Some non-internet guy has probably worked hard to create that website. And you try to use his efforts to 'prove' a vile libelous allegation? Pathetic.

It is frankly disgusting and foul. Grabbing anything in sight, twisting it, lying, making stuff up - anything at all just to campaign against someone suffering in jail. I hope genuine people on here are reading all these many scurrilous posts closely, and learning about your nature. You must have a pretty sad life if this is how you get your kicks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SteveV

Credible? Some non-internet guy has probably worked hard to create that website. And you try to use his efforts to 'prove' a vile libelous allegation? Pathetic.

---

Steve that is the about page for freeschapelle (.com.au) that's the site with the paypal links that you reckon is genuine. It's not run by a noob, the site is registered to QLD business man, Neville Wright (long time beater of the Corby drum, but of course in no way associated with 'the family').

I thought you said you got in contact with the person at the other end?

Don't tell me you read this on the front page and were convinced?