You only quit smoking once?
I quit for a year once. :(
Quit for two years, once, too. :mad:
Quit last time in 1982. :thumbsup:
Same day I met the Goddess...
Right place, right time, I guess. :cool:
Printable View
You only quit smoking once?
I quit for a year once. :(
Quit for two years, once, too. :mad:
Quit last time in 1982. :thumbsup:
Same day I met the Goddess...
Right place, right time, I guess. :cool:
Nope!Quote:
Originally Posted by DreadedHermie
Didn't mention the first 7 times I quit, 'cause it was easy.
That's why I kept starting back up.
Was starting to wonder what them, (I'm addicted), weaklings were whining about.
Smoking is a choice.
Just choose not to smoke.
Heck I started when I was 12.
Un-filtered Luck Strikes, Philip Morris Commanders, Camels, Pall Malls and English Ovals.
Pack a day, off and on, for the next 25 years.
Would quit for a month, or 6, did quit for a Year and a half once.
Nothin' to it.:thumbsup:
Bought a house in '81.
Thought, perhaps I should quit again so I don't stink up the new house.
Oh so confident, I announce my intention.
Well, physical addiction is a fact.:(
And a bitch!
Been 28 years now, and Nick O'Tine still scares me.
Funny, the wife quit when she met me in '91.:)
But, I sure ain't no goddess.:rastasmoke:
Aloha.
Wee
P - K Kn4
[attachment=o230072]
"Kokomoko!
Slowly, I turned, step by step.
And then!
I grabbed him!" - Abbot and Costello Late '40s.
Weeze is old.
P - KR4
I remember the Stooges doing the "Slowly I turn...Inch by inch..." routine. Same schtick? (Hermie's old, too. I know it's hard to tell -- it's the moisturizers!):lovestruck:
B - K2
[attachment=o230121]
[attachment=o230122]
It's weewee weewee stwong too!
Sowwy!
Smoked some Funder Fudd.
Couple hits of AK should fix it.
<Recites>; Reader rabbit ripped Rodney's roots.
Yup dat got it.;)
With our winds, no build like oak, build like coco palm.
Flimsy, cheap, materials but surprisingly strong.
All trussed-up.
So let da winds blow.
Screw all dem rustler.
I gonna grow!
Loves dat AK.:stoned:
W.
It's starting to look to me like the primary effect of far-red is telling the plant its got lotsa nearby neighbors, and to stretch to outgrow them.
I'm seeing a lot of anecdotal evidence--and reasoning that I suspect is based on faulty premises in regard to the red / far-red connection.
This is from Physicsnole (old). Have you encountered any supporting studies? For one thing, is this talking about intiating flower, or maintaining it? Both?
I would like to believe this stuff. And Leadenjin must have a reason for offering 735's. But wanting to believe it may be clouding some judgements. What do you think?
Quote:
With 735nm far-red/near-infrared emitters available then it's possible to flower cannabis with 15 hours 'daylight'. How? Why? Well, the plant senses that critical 12-hours-darkness that triggers flowering in cannabis because a critical amount of phytochrome-FR has slowly, naturally, reverted to phytochrome-R during the dark cycle. But during the 'day' 660nm red light converts the phyto-R into phyto-FR, while far-red 735nm light more slowly converts the phyto-FR back to phyto-R. So we run all lights for 15 hours, then run nothing but 735nm for another two hours and finally 7 hours darkness.- artificially driving much of the phyto-FR back to phyto-R without waiting 12 hours for the natural reversion- so you can actually flower with shorter nights.