You wouldn't know, because you were cut as an infant. If my thumbs were cut off as a baby, I'd think that it was "normal", tooQuote:
Originally Posted by LIP
Printable View
You wouldn't know, because you were cut as an infant. If my thumbs were cut off as a baby, I'd think that it was "normal", tooQuote:
Originally Posted by LIP
We chose not to have our son circumcized after reading all the info on the subject. He's 20, and I'd say that among his contemporaries, about half of the boys have been cut and half have not. (In my husband's day, nearly every boy baby was routinely circumcized before they left the hospital.) I truly believe that it's not a necessary procedure, and more and more people these days are choosing not to do that. In a few years when I become a practicing physician, if I become an ob/gyn or a pediatrician like I'm leaning toward, I'm sure I'll be taught the skill but I don't plan to encourage my patients to do it.
no i am not and my girl love to lick betwen the skin and my dick ... it is agreat pleasure
A little info and history of circumcision. Circumcision was first intiated by the Hebrews. The intial motivation is thought to have been because of masturbation. In society then it was frowned upon and looked as a possible stimulus for non-conformity to the hebrew "one god" thought. It eventually built steem later in history, through the medical profession and obviously will all of the religions that had hebrewism as roots. The thought was that if you cut of a sensitive part of the penis (comparable to female mutilation) that boys would not want to pleasure themselves.
From a medical point of view, the glans' (head of the penis) outer dermal layer becomes thicker than without circumcision and somewhat desensitized. This is because there are deeper layers of dead skin that not constitute the glans. Comparable to what happens if you walk around bare footed alot, although not as extreme. Now, I know people who are circumsized will say that they are still sensitive, but thats only because your reference point is only from the point of being circumsized.
I have a cousin who is 40+ now and married with kids. When he met his wife, she was from Alabama and I guess was weirded out by the whole uncircumsized thing. I guess he decided to get circumsized at like 30 or something. He said it was the worst thing that he had ever done. Sensitivity was no where near the same. He now had to use some form of lube to masturbate and it has not enhanced his sex life. If you are unhygenic and do not take care of yourself then maybe you should consider circumcision. uncircumsized men are more prone to penile cancer (especially if a history of yeast infections is present), smega buildup and sometimes improper fuction of the foreskin (not opening enough). If you clean yourself then you have no worries. Hope this clears up some info and BTW...most people in this world are NOT cut.
Yeh like Breukelen advocaat posted, the "HEAD" of ya penis is somewhat comparable to your GUMS or your EYEBALLS ... its sensitive, and it has a protective covering which is the foreskin .. similar to how you have eyelids for ya eyes..imagine removing ya fucking eyelids lol. like he said, "If the eyelid were removed and the eyeball were to become keratinized, you'd have a much harder time seeing" This is what happens to ya glans , as a result of being out all the fucking time permanently being exposed and shit lol...it should just be left alone, it's ridiculous to modify ya body so barbarically..there have been NO proven health benefits whatsoever..and CLEANLIENESS is bullshit. Lets cut out eyelids off why dont we so we dont get eye-boogers anymore..oo such a hassle to clean that shit out. Thats what the frame of thought is on by saying circumcision is beneficial for CLEANLIENESS..pshhhh foreskin's there for a reason!
Hellll no I'm not circumcised and I love it that way. I've tried living like the other half lives... pulled the skin back, put it back in my shorts and walked around... I was so sensitive I was dancing all over the place lol and I *like* that it's that sensitive. I don't know what it's like to be cut 24/7 so obviously I have nothing to compare it to. No idea if I'm hyper-sensitive because it's wearing the hoodie most of the time or if all cut guys are sensitive like that or what.
I've had one woman in my 30 years of trying to get back into that which spat me out 45 years ago suggest that I get cut and she was dismissed for even suggesting that I let a doctor get close to my weiner with a scalpel. It just wasn't gonna work! Every other woman that has cared to comment has liked it. I suppose they COULD have been trying to preserve my feelings but I try not to over-analyze in moments such as those.
I have a 13 year old son, and he's circumcised. As has been suggested, we were was concerned about hygeine, how he would be accepted etc. but looking back, I wish we'd said no. Kids find so many reasons to single out other kids, it just seems silly to try to eliminate all of the potential reasons. Kinda like a dog chasing it's tail. I think if you do a good job raising your boys they'll be well adjusted whether they're circumcised or not. It's the maladjusted kids that will single a boy out for something like that and you can't do anything about them because they're not your kids! My boy wears glasses and he gets singled out because of it. But no, I'm not gonna run out and get him contacts because he's not too hot on the idea of sticking stuff in his eyeballs. I don't blame him.
Nah mikey you aint hyper-sensitive...all uncircumcised guyz got sensitive glans cuz we are so used to da skin over it, its comfortable like dat!
Cut people dont feel the same level of sensitivity that we do because they had their foreskin removed when they were infants, so they basically adjusted and they don't feel any difference...as a result of the glans being exposed 24/7 they get used to it.. WE on the other-hand have had our sensitive glans properly covered with the skin that has been given to us to cover it up DUE to it's extreme sensitivity..
If you was dancing around all over the place just by pulling ya skin back and experimenting..imagine how the poor baby feels..his skin isnt even pulled back..its fucking REMOVED man! and the sensitive glans are exposed...do you fucking know how disturbing it must feel to have ANY form of contact whatsoever? think about it! its like something touching your eyeball...THAT sensitive. Picture being an infant circumcised recently, wearing a fucking DIAPER with ya glans in close contact with it....ouch man, if this shit isn't cruelty then what is??? There is no need for circumcision! Let it be a fucking choice thing..
Like I said, when the child grows to be old enough, THEN he should be given the option of whether or not he'd prefer to keep the foreskin or have it circumcised and removed. It's all about consent..we'd see his choice THEN.
Well, in all fairness, there seems to be some pretty convincing evidence of some strong benefits to circumcision, at least in sub-Saharan Africa. I read this this morning and thought of this discussion. Not sure this makes quite as convincing a case for people in countries where HIV isn't as prevalent as it is in Africa, but still, this was interesting.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory?id=2175975
I'm sorry, but I don't buy that report at all - the best way to avoid AIDS is to wear condoms, and they said nothing about that in the article.Quote:
Originally Posted by birdgirl73
They also said nothing about other forms of STD's, which provide a gateway to AIDS in Africa (or anywhere). When a male goes to a prostitute, which is extremely common in certain percentages of males in Africa (expecially those that work far from home), and catches various types of Venereal Disease, he then can easily get AIDS because vulnerablilty increases drastically.
It's very difficult for heterosexual males to get AIDS, normally. It has to get into the blood - and various types of VD provide the entry points. This is the main reason that it's so prevalent among heterosexual men in Africa. It is possible that the men that are circumcised are the ones that don't travel much and/or visit prostitutes. They (the circumcised men) are probably from a higher socio-economic group, have a higher educational level, better access to medical facilities, etc., as well.
totally uncut ;)
feel sorry for all you ppl who been cut
%10 off...hahha