Printable View
Youre right about the surveillance. The pentagon is one of the most videoed buildings in the united states even more so than fort knox. And like i mentioned before, the plane crashed into a closed down section. that was their mistake. If it was a closed down section with no occupancy or any equipment then why cant the photos be released? in fact it was being renovated which means nothing would have looked the same anyway.
the initial pictures after whatever hit that building, shows a relatively small hole, compared to the wreckage you'd think a giant plane would have left behind. nothing at all where the wings and engines would have hit...and smaller than the body of the plane itself, with no damage to the lawn...
it's amazing. every attack turns physics on its head, but that's just the way it is. a couple small fires will make modern steel buildings collapse and completely melt massive steel columns up and down a building even though the fires weren't nearly hot enough to even turn the steel red hot, just shutup and believe it.
I saw a video (possibly on prisonplanet.com) where there were actual small explosions that went off when the second jet hit the second building.
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/articles/...explosives.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...reevidence.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...blecharges.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/070903wtcanomolies.html
(shot down in pennsylvania) http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...04flight93.htm
the building 7 one is the best...the third one down...that building was clearly a controlled demolition...it was just magically all loaded with explosives ready to blow up at the push of a button...and 9/11 was used as the reason it came down...
i've seen videos of many controlled demolitions, and building 7 is one of the best i've seen.
oh well...
This is easily the stupidest thing I have ever read regarding the events of 9/11. Congratulations.Quote:
Originally Posted by pisshead
dude, it wasn't a 757. If you look at the video, its clearly not a plain, nor a missile, but a MILK TRUCK. ~silence~ That is right!! A milk truck with a jet engine attacked the pentagon!!!! That wreckage photo? FAKE the milk truck was painted to look like a jet.
yocass, I dunno what that is in your avator, but i really like looking at it. I dont know if i want to bite it or something. Maybe play with it in my hands. who knows?
that is easily the most ignorant thing i have ever read regarding the events of 9/11. congratulations.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beeblebrox.420
the owner, larry silverstein, admitted in a pbs documentary that they decided to pull the building...reporters were told to get away because the building was going to come down...police told people on the street to get away because the building was coming down...
if you've ever actually seen the collapse of building 7...it's absolutely perfect. but i forgot, no plane hit it, and a few small fires made a steel building collapse. that's normal.
its peyote natural. But pisshead... that doesnt explain the milk truck theory though, does it.
Yes, but you said he had decided to pull the building down BEFORE 9/11 and used the 9/11 attacks as the excuse. He did not. He only admitted to asking the FDNY to pull down the building after it had caught fire after the crashes. It was NOT wired up to blow before the attack. At least get your facts straight before shooting your mouth off.Quote:
Originally Posted by pisshead