If you still have the contents of the QF box there will be a piece of paper inside showing the batch number. He may have used an old or a counterfeit batch and they caught it as non human.Quote:
Originally Posted by hitorpass
Printable View
If you still have the contents of the QF box there will be a piece of paper inside showing the batch number. He may have used an old or a counterfeit batch and they caught it as non human.Quote:
Originally Posted by hitorpass
We Don't so we don't know its not the five . Seven I know that but they did the test on the job site they sent it to lab for further testing because the results for marijuana there was nothing the others were all negative but I think its ironic he smoked and probably had thc on his hands why would any synthetic pee throw a positive result for marijuana tho
Your confusing me with the 7 and 5, are you talking about the panel number that the test was? As far as having the thc on your hands, Ive never heard of anyone failing because of something like this. You said above that the test was neither negative or positive which leads me to believe it was an old batch or a counterfeit one.Quote:
Originally Posted by hitorpass
Instant drug tests do not read "negative" or "positive", so therefore its impossible for a drug test resulting in neither positive nor negative for THC.
What likely happened was the tech saw a faint line, and either s/he wasnt sure how to interpret it, or s/he flat out misinterpreted the faint line as a "positive" and sent the sample out for a confirmation test. Either way, the sample would be confirmed negative for THC.
Bad synthetic batches are distinguished by the dissipitation of the urine constituent "buffers" (particularly creatinine and SG) that are tested during the validity check.
Another thing: having THC residue on your hands have no effect on any urine test. Urine tests check for drug metabolites and not residues. Therefore, the THC must be ingested and metabolized into THCA before it becomes detectable on the U/A.
I guess I missed the part about the test being instant, thanks for straightening this out BT.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burnt Toast
Let me ease the worries of anyone taking a standard pre employment 5 panel urine test at LABCORP using quick fix 5.7. i took it an passed! As long as you get the temperature within 90-100 degrees you will have no problems. I was freaking out before, during, and after... but let me tell you quick fix is your only guarantee to passing a urine test at Labcorp if you think your pee will be dirty. Don't trust diluting, and don't trust these detox drinks (unless you have a couple of weeks to really clean out your system before the test). Good luck to all that have to go through what I just went through. Thank g-d it is over, and thank g-d for quick fix.
First, let me thank those memebers who disseminate CORRECT information on this and other related boards about substitution, quickfix, and urinalysis for cannabis. You are truly doing a tremendous service for the community at large. People's lives and families are at stake here (e.g feeding children). Also, thank you for identifying MISINFORMATION and even DISINFORMATION posted on this and related boards. While we remain persecuted for activities in our private lives, we must meticulously stay ahead of the "system's" game.
Let me secondarily state that I am a PhD bioscientist who has DIRECT experience developing/inventing immunoassays, am well versed in human physiology as it pertains to urine content and drug pharmacokinetics, and I am also a MMJ patient. That being said, I am apalled to see how much nonsense people state on these type of boards. From my perspective, it sounds ridiculous.
For the first time in my life, I was recently drug tested for a job (pre-employment). I didn't have time to clean out through abstinence. So I did my research and concluded substitution was the best approach and QuickFix was the way to go. I was, and am stil concerned about the rare reports of people using QF and failing. While the educated here have dispelled the validity of most of these failure claims, a few still may have merit, though I am hoping the explanation in those cases is due to product tampering/counterfeiting.
I used QF5.7, batch # ending in -09 tday. I practiced getting the temp correct like many of you recommended. Thanks. I learned that the temp. strip on the QF bottle is actually markedly inacurate (3-5°F lower) than the true temp as measured with a calibrated thermom. This worried me. After pissing in the cup though, I realized that Labcorp uses a similar style inacurate (2-4°F lower) temp strip on their cup, so its a wash in terms of getting the specimen right where u need it to be. I will report my results on this board at the end of this week. I don't have the time to dispell all the crap I have read on subbing here, but let me make one point. shrt f some miracle, I find it impossible to believe that validated labs use Quickfix to calibrate their testing equipment as I have read on the product web sites. As someone who has calibrated these type of machines before, the standards used to calibrate ALWAYS come with QA verified, QC tested, specifications. QF product does not contain a technical spec sheet in the box as is ALWAYS the case with calibration standards. Thank you all.
I'd be really interested to hear what happened with this guy - obviously knows what he is talking aboutQuote:
Originally Posted by SyncMaster915N
I have to go to a "center for family health" and office in my area - from what I know, it's where all the medi-cal patients have to go, it's in the hood, so I imagine that they are not as intense as other places - I've been there, it's really ghetto - all women workers every time I've been before, so I doubt that anybody is going into the room with me
I have a batch # P1M-10, so I will post my results - I was told by a friend about this stuff, bought it at the same place as he did, and he has 2 other friends that have used it at a "uni-lab" clinic, they all passed - I imagine that a lab is going to be more on the ball than a free clinic
I'm still nervous as hell about this - I haven't smoked in a week and a 1/2, and I have about 4 days before I go, so I know I wont test clean on my own - I even thought about snagging my son's urine out of his little trainer potty, but my friend that told me about the quick fix (it's 5.7) said I was out of my mind and needed to chill out
any thoughts?
feel free to send good karma waves at me - my marijuana habit has never affected my work in the past, in my opinion, this is a bunch of draconian BS, but whatever, need this new job
New to the site. Was doing some research on QuickFix. Just bought a batch from the local head shop. Dude knew what he was talking about. I bought Formula 5.7 with batch number P1K-10. Im more than likely testing at labcorp so im sure ill be fine. Just wondered if either of the previous 2 posters (Crate Digger or SyncMaster) have results.
I was just reading the Federal Drug Testing Guidelines. There was a section on reporting test results, to the best of my recollection a lab is supposed to report problems in an average of 5 business days. That means that they can take longer than 5 business days, or shorter. I have just gone through 2 and a half business days.Quote:
Originally Posted by InvadedPrivacy
I also read in the SAMSA guidelines under FAQS that they have been evaluating hair samples and are not using them now, but intend to perhaps use them in the future along with urine samples to compare results. This would perhaps make substitution a thing of the past. Or we could start seeing a bunch of hairless people.