Note that I said partly the reason. How much money would we have to help stem off financial disasters likes this if we hadn't gone to war in Afghanistan and Iraq? If having a stable democracy is good for the people of Iraq , what is wrong with everyone working towards a common goal? Is not everyone pulling together better than someone pulling alone? I do not see why you are so against the people of Iraq being able to choose for themselves, Or do you like the ways of old better? I am not saying invading Iraq wasn't a mistake, because it was,but If they are giving this cash up voluntarily what is wrong with that? Maybe they see the need to help us out for our logistical support, as they basically have none. So of course our operations are going to be much more costly than their own. How many life's might that money save instead of sitting in a bank somewhere? Why waste a resource when everything today is so strapped for cash?Quote:
Originally Posted by psychocat
