Cut vs. Uncut (WARNING:if the subject of penises grosses you out, don't look!!)

sweetheat and i have become one ;)

check my homepage bro

lmao

Ain't nuttin' but a sweet thang.

Im cut [because im jewish, even though im un orthodox]

All the bitches i've been with said it looks alot better than uncut... and the cleanliness is another upside...

But more importantly... the risk of STDs goes down... no away... but down... but i aint stupid enough to get an STD... i dont get to shag that often :(

You'll find the poeple saying

Cut people are gay... got smaller cocks... cant feel anything... it's all bullshit.

The people who say that are the children. You know why they say it? Because they dont fully understand it.

The unsensitive thing is probably GOOD.... think about it... the less sensitive you are the longer you take to come.... therefore pleasing the woman more...

But anyway, ui dont care for these discussions, not when aload of kids cant post stuf worth reading

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HiProGlow

Last time I went to Amsterdam I met a girl and we got together. When she saw my penis she was startled...lol...not because of it's enormous size, but because I'm circumsised. She said she'd never seen one before, circumsised that is. She told me it's uncommon to be cirumcised in Europe. Is this true?
So now I'm baked and I'm reminiscing and thought, does circumsision vs noncircumsision make a difference? Am I missing out on something besides foreskin? So ladies, or gentlemen for that matter, which do you prefer and is there a difference when shagging? I'm not up to speed on the subject of international penises in general, but why is it that most Europeans are not circumsised and a lot of Americans are? Peace

---

Circumcision is something that is becoming more rare in the US. I believe now the populatoin of circumcised vs uncircumcised right now is around 50%? I believe in the long run it has been proven worse to be circumsized than to be uncircumsized. It is now more of a social thing rather than a health thing. I personally think natural is always better, doesn't really make any sense to me to circumsize someone. My boyfriend isn't circumsized. It has been proven that guys who aren't circumsized have more a more sensative penis therefore sex is better for them(not that they would know anyway?)...anyway...if i ever have a son, gauranteed he won't be circumsized. Whats the point? It's messed up.

All I will say on the subject is an 'uncut' dick is an ugly dick... They look freaking weird... I dunno, I'm not a chick though so I dont have to deal with it... But I'm glad I was circumcised... Looks better, easy to stay super clean, and it lasts longer during sex.

all i know is spanish leather cleared it all up for me. I am uncut and I can please a woman. I shower also so my dong never stinks so I don't care how clean your dong is mine is just as clean as yours.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TallulahGreen

I believe now the populatoin of circumcised vs uncircumcised right now is around 50%? I believe in the long run it has been proven worse to be circumsized than to be uncircumsized. It is now more of a social thing rather than a health thing. I personally think natural is always better, doesn't really make any sense to me to circumsize someone. My boyfriend isn't circumsized. It has been proven that guys who aren't circumsized have more a more sensative penis therefore sex is better for them(not that they would know anyway?)...anyway...if i ever have a son, gauranteed he won't be circumsized. Whats the point? It's messed up.

---

I would guess the ratio would favor circumsized.

I don't think you could say that circumsized dicks have more problems. I have never had any type of 'issue' with my dick. Its fine, its a dick, I couldn't even imagine having an issue due to circumcision.

With all respect, I don't think a girl has the capability to decide whether or not to circumsize. I don't buy the whole sensitivity thing and that sex is better or more pleasurable. Its more of a personal preference maybe, but I just couldn't imagine not being circumsized.

Just hearing that a dirty uncircumsized penis can smell like....ugh....cheese makes me fuckin gag.

It's pretty nasty to watch.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...q=circumcision

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho

actually, both get about the same feeling, they have more nerve endings, but because of that extra skin, not as many of their nerve endings get touched as ours.. pleasure wise, it equals out in the end...

uncircumsized looks weird... also if you're not really clean about it that shit can stink.... lol only thing down there that ends up stinking on me is my balls...

---

Uncircumsized looks weird? Well, that's how god intended every man to be when they came out and grew up to be a man. God didn't intend on man taking a razor and chopping off a part of their penis that shouldn't be cut off. Getting nerves cut out doesn't sound too interesting or appealing to me. I'm uncut and i love it. I keep my shit clean all the time and it never stinks except for after nice sex with no rubber. Mine is also ultra sensitive too but BJ's still feel great and sex is absolutely phenomenal (SP?). Anyways, that's my two cents. In the end, a dick is a dick no matter what it looks like.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ValkyrieAg

I would guess the ratio would favor circumsized.
Its fine, its a dick, I couldn't even imagine having an issue due to circumcision.

---

Really?????

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumc...f_circumcision

the rarest thing I've heard of circumcision is some boys loose thier entire penises from the procedure, do to an infection. This came from from a very anti-cut person, so i don't want to lend it truth.

HOWEVER, when it comes to the sensitivity issue, MANY OF YOU ARE IN DENILE. Let's analyze something:

Fact: the foreskin has TONS of nerve endings, and nerve endings are where feeling comes from (your elbow has less nerves, hence, u can't feel much there). Hence removing the foreskin would take away the ability for you to FEEL the same thing that i could. IT'S PURE LOGIC!!!!


FURTHERMORE, your head is more leathery (for back of a better word) than mine, guaranteed; look to my former post for a qualifying example.

Many, though not all, circumsized men will never admit that there penises can not feel the same thing as ours. This is because men will never tell others that they're wrong about anything b/c this shows that they're weak (I'm grossly over simplyfing here; just look up male gender ideology and you'll understand what I'm talking about and I'm too lazy to talk about it).

FURTHERMORE, i like how many men here say, "there's no sensitivity lost when circumsized", YET they will ALSO say that circumsized men last longer. HMMM?????? One of these reasons disqualifies the others and vice versa. THE UNFORTUNATE FACT IS THAT men in America are uncomfortable with the fact that there might be something wrong (bad word choice, but you get what i'm trying to say) with them AND that they COULDN'T DO ANYTHING TO CONTROL IT. Masculinty is based on POWER: power over females and power over males. If you don't have control over your own life decisions, especially in relation to the one thing that DEFINES him as a male, you are gonna feel something inside of you that you don't wanna feel; you will supress this thought. A MALE NEVER WANTS TO DOUBT HIMSELF--lack of power = lack of masculinty.

Can we get some girls on this? How many females have had sex with both and can compare?

SL

P.S. once again, sorry for the poor nature of this post. I'm having 3 conversations at once with my family