I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
use distilled water. i smoked with it, and it smoked smoother. i think this is the cause for all these contradictions between logical scientific proof (that THC is not h2o soluble) and experience (a joint or blunt gets you fucked up). tap water, which most of use use is full of flouride, vitamins, all kinda of shit. distilled water is pure H2O, meaning it will be better able to remove tar and stuff from the smoke. I smoked one bowl outta my double bubbler with distilled water last night and then watched a movie, fucked out of my mind. i was also high for a lot longer time
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
If it's 3%, then your experiment will be 97% worthless, because 97% of the experience will probably be the same, seeing as 97% of the stuff is water
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transition Force
If it's 3%, then your experiment will be 97% worthless, because 97% of the experience will probably be the same, seeing as 97% of the stuff is water
Not if the 3% cleans out 99% of what was there before.
Confusinggggg. :confused:
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
i belive, a bottle of that stuff, in it purest buyable form is posiness if swallowed.it makes a good mouth wash when you have cavatys if you dont swallo the crap, and also, i think it maybe a bit flameable
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
and the reason (methinks) for him getting extremely fucked up, is...
"because oxeygen gets you high" brad pitt, fight club
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Where is there oxygen?
Guys, H2O2 and H2O and O2 are two entirely different compounds. Just because it has a molecule of oxygen doesn't make it oxygen.
You have no device that can test how much is actually being filtered, and you have no idea why the hit would burn more than usual, because there are hundreds of other variables. Just because it burned doesn't make you right, and it doesn't make you wrong either because you're going about the process the entirely wrong way.
Third, why?. Even if it is cold, the difference in filtering has nothing to do with the freezing temperature, it has to do with the difference in temperatures between the two mediums.
Which brings me to my last point. 3% hydrogen peroxide can cause nausea, vomiting, or burning. 3% hydrogen peroxide would probably freeze around the same point as water, seeing as how they're freezing points aren't that differently. Of course, there's no way to tell without experimentation.
Graph, the voice of reason. The voice of reason that nobody wanted.
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
Can somebody explain this to me: cold water will cool the smoke, but somehow it filters less tar and shit than warm water?
I did well in science, so don't spare me the technical shit.
I have a hypothesis which must be tested!
well, it is utterly disgusting.
no offense moorephened, but I think you should focus your energy on different projects than this one.
it does burn the throat and the inside of the frontal lobe, i kid you not.
i took half a rip and had to stop because it just felt too sketchy.
good idea though, always fun trying new things! :thumbsup:
come up with something else, and i'll test it for ya, at a decent price too!
:rasta: