In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignatius
No, my view of the world is not that of a simpleton. But just for sport Ozarks why don't you tell me what the USA is doing in Iraq.
In your own time and all that.
Well we sure aren't there for oil, what (little) oil Iraq does export goes mostly to France due to contracts Saddam signed, and which so far the new (Iraq) Government has chosen to Honor.
Right now what the USA and (32) other countries are doing is supporting the elected Government, engaging in rebuilding projects, killing bad guys whenever the opportunity arises and paying for it all with our money & blood while all the oil (you KNOW we're after) goes to France.
BTW Iraq doesn't pump enough oil to meet its own needs, due to 30 years of bad maintenance/enterstructure investment, 12 years of sanctions and now being blown up from time to time, but it needs money so it exports some oil.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by FireyBudBurner
Stop ranting and dissing other peoples ideas when yours are so simple and close minded, people like you is the reason our country is in political turmoil. Just shut up for once and listen, and maybe even COMPROMISE, I doubt you can even fanthom words like this though judging on what you've said so far.
First and fore most....I have worked in the Ski, Snowboard industry since 85.
In you Avatar you look like a total NERD ...PLease change your picture before you give all snow sliders a bad Name............Gaper.
yes, I diss Ideas Like.... Me and My Family should be Muslims.
I dont want to live under Muslim law, and I dont want my kids too either. AND YOU BET YOUR ASS I WONT COMPROMISE.
Im sure you are the, Enemy Within, with a GAy picture...
do you seriously like that Picture of you? Let me tell you its stupid.
here is a real pic
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Spirit
Deouncing liberals as the enemy is trademark in a fascist nation.
GS is the Type that would have been in Central Park during ww2 saying that Hitler is MISSUNDERSTOOD...... STFU
Switch............
Bleeding hart Liberals are the Enemy within...like you GS.:thumbsup:
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Ok then Ozarks, that's your view point. Thanks for sharing it with us. I think you are wrong of course. Why would America waste it's time protecting democracy in Iraq when it singularly fails to do so elsewhere? Tell me, what business is it of America's what kind of govt they have in Iraq? Who made you world policeman? Of course it's to do with oil and territory, to think otherwise is naive in the extreme. If you are so interested in your version of democracy I can think of a few countries who you could make a start on. China for one. Or is China too big a target for you? In the meantime you might as well do business with them huh? I tell you what, I've lived in the states for a good while, and I like the people a lot. I like everything about America, but you are startingly naive when it comes down to politics. You have NO IDEA what's going on in the rest of the world. What's more you think you have a right to impose your ideas on it by force. You don't, and unfortunately whilst you are working in the "snow industry" thousands of your less well off countrymen are paying the ultimate price in Iraq and Afghanistan. But hey, who cares, at least you get to beat your chest right?
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
One more thing...Iraq has the second largest oil reserves in the middle east. Saudi Arabia has the biggest. And we all know who is best friends with the house of Saud don't we?
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignatius
Ok then Ozarks, that's your view point. Thanks for sharing it with us. I think you are wrong of course.
I now What you think, I don't understand why.
Quote:
Why would America waste it's time protecting democracy in Iraq when it singularly fails to do so elsewhere?
So, lack of perfection on this planet proves trying is wrong ?
Quote:
Tell me, what business is it of America's what kind of govt they have in Iraq?
It isn't our business it's theirs, thats why they have elections.
Quote:
Who made you world policeman?
Cowards won't do the right thing and are jealous of those who try.
Quote:
Of course it's to do with oil and territory, to think otherwise is naive in the extreme.
No it doesn't see my last 3 posts but don't let reality sidetrack your agenda.:)
Quote:
If you are so interested in your version of democracy I can think of a few countries who you could make a start on. China for one. Or is China too big a target for you?
China is already a democracy economicaly, politically it be one in the years to come, with out us firing a shot
Quote:
In the meantime you might as well do business with them huh?
You are starting to catch on.
Quote:
I tell you what, I've lived in the states for a good while, and I like the people a lot. I like everything about America, but you are startingly naive when it comes down to politics. You have NO IDEA what's going on in the rest of the world.
Unable to compete, the delusion of "I'm smarter then them, they don't understand" were have I heard that before ?
Quote:
What's more you think you have a right to impose your ideas on it by force.
WE aren't "imposing"" anything on anyone
Quote:
You don't, and unfortunately whilst you are working in the "snow industry"
I have no idea what you (think) you're talking about ?
Quote:
thousands of your less well off countrymen are paying the ultimate price in Iraq and Afghanistan. But hey, who cares, at least you get to beat your chest right?
Americans always "pay the price" to build a better world, beating our chests has nothing to do with it.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Nobody asked America to invade Iraq, in fact the complete opposite happened. You went for the UN backing, failed to get it, so went ahead anyway. The Iraqis don't want you there, that's why so many of them are trying to kill coalition forces. You are attempting to impose your ideas of "democracy" on the world. One way or another Iraq would have eventually gotten round to changing the way it was governed. Remind me, what business was it of the USA again? Imagine for a moment that Iraq didn't like the way that the USA was being run. Would it be ok for them to invade the USA and try to overthrow your government? After all, Bush got in via a rigged vote didn't he? Was there not something fishy about those votes down in Florida? Does the fact that Iraq disapproves of your way of governing yourselves give it the right to invade? How come it's ok for you and not for them? Unless you are advancing the "might is right" argument, then we have a whole other discussion. Anyway, you are working in a ski resort, or whatever, (sorry if my "snow industry" remark was a little too esoteric for you, I'll try and speak in plainer terms for you next time) Meanwhile your fellow countrymen (that is to say NOT YOU) are paying the ultimate price. You carry on beating your chest and screaming your superiority over the rest of the world. In the meantime you will keep seeing your servicemen coming home in body bags, while the Haliburton group gets richer and richer. But hey, it's all worth it right? Try taking your head out of your arse and you might see the truth of the matter, but I doubt it.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignatius
Nobody asked America to invade Iraq, in fact the complete opposite happened. You went for the UN backing, failed to get it, so went ahead anyway. The Iraqis don't want you there, that's why so many of them are trying to kill coalition forces. You are attempting to impose your ideas of "democracy" on the world. One way or another Iraq would have eventually gotten round to changing the way it was governed. Remind me, what business was it of the USA again? Imagine for a moment that Iraq didn't like the way that the USA was being run. Would it be ok for them to invade the USA and try to overthrow your government? After all, Bush got in via a rigged vote didn't he? Was there not something fishy about those votes down in Florida? Does the fact that Iraq disapproves of your way of governing yourselves give it the right to invade? How come it's ok for you and not for them? Unless you are advancing the "might is right" argument, then we have a whole other discussion. Anyway, you are working in a ski resort, or whatever, (sorry if my "snow industry" remark was a little too esoteric for you, I'll try and speak in plainer terms for you next time) Meanwhile your fellow countrymen (that is to say NOT YOU) are paying the ultimate price. You carry on beating your chest and screaming your superiority over the rest of the world. In the meantime you will keep seeing your servicemen coming home in body bags, while the Haliburton group gets richer and richer. But hey, it's all worth it right? Try taking your head out of your arse and you might see the truth of the matter, but I doubt it.
I worked in the Snow Industry...NOt Ozark you are dumb.
Do us a Favor....Stay In England...we dont ned any more america haters here, we have enough all ready.
Why dont you worry about...Londonstan. Leave the USA to us Americans.
It was Liberals like you that made us Loose Viet Nam...we wont lose this one ...WE CANT........Look at londonstan.....over run by radical Muslims.
Londonistan (book)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
Jump to: navigation, search
Londonistan: How Britain is creating a terror state withinLondonistan: How Britain is creating a terror state within (ISBN 1-59403-144-4) is a book by journalist Melanie Phillips on the topic of the proliferation of Islamism in the United Kingdom over the past twenty years. The book is published in London by Encounter books.
[edit]
Overview
The book encompasses a critique of multiculturalism, weak policing, cultural relativism, and what she terms a 'victim culture'. She argues that these forces combined to create an ideal breeding ground for Islamic terrorists. She points to the centrality of London based individuals and groups to many terror plots around the world, which she argues were enabled by a semi-formal "covenant of security" between Islamists and the British authorities. Zacharias Moussaoui and shoebomber Richard Reid are two of many such examples she points to in the book.
According to Steven Emerson the book: "... exposes the scandalous appeasement of militant Islam by British officials, the media, even the Church of England, capturing in extraordinary detail how British society and institutions have either ignored or actively fostered the growth of extremist groups on British soil".
Im sure we will have to save your asses again.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
[quote=Nylo]Yes, as a democrat it was difficult to understand how dangerous modern liberalism is. Once upon a time liberalism was enlightening and promoted rational progressive thinking.
Not anymore. They've perverted the democrats just as the neo-cons have subverted the republican party. Americans are being given two radical paths two lead the country into when neither should be considered.[/QUOTE
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
[quote=greasecleaner61]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nylo
Yes, as a democrat it was difficult to understand how dangerous modern liberalism is. Once upon a time liberalism was enlightening and promoted rational progressive thinking.
Not anymore. They've perverted the democrats just as the neo-cons have subverted the republican party. Americans are being given two radical paths two lead the country into when neither should be considered.[/QUOTE
so true, they quit smoking weed and started smoken crack
