Religion is a prophetable business!
Printable View
Religion is a prophetable business!
http://www.wcg.org/lit/bible/Rev/2witnesses.htm :confused: HUH? I THOUGHT YOU KNEW! Oh well,here's a link for ya!Quote:
Originally Posted by Krogith
So you don't consider the many uses of hemp as evidence of the comin' 1,000 years of peace?Quote:
Originally Posted by manshowboy487
O.K. let's see proof of this,not allegations!Quote:
Originally Posted by weirdo79
Which ones? You have to list'em you know,not just look for somethin' to attack just to create contraversy!Quote:
You're forgetting all the other prophecies.
http://www.potts.net.au/tree/misc/adam.html You mean this lineage? Got any links to back your theory?Quote:
(Plus the changing of certain lineages completely in your aforementioned kingdoms...Oh but dont let facts get in the way).
Talk about ignorance! You're in the BIG LEAGUE here so act like it and start backin' it up! These fictional CHEAPSHOTS don't work with me!Quote:
Anyone who believes the bible is 100% accurate is 100% idiot...The endtimes have gone and passed more than 10 times now...Care to support any of your doomsday scenario's with actual information or just wild assumptions backed by no facts again? Oh wait the bible didnt mean 2000! it meant the year 3000 so keep sending in money folks
This link couldn't float on CONCRETE! BORIN'!Quote:
.......
People believe what they want to believe , I choose not to believe in something that so obviously was written by maniacs ( evilbible.com ) and I really don't buy prophets of any kind.
Nostradamus was more reliable and I still think it's a question of interpretation of what are at best vagueries.
[quote=psychocat]I TOTALLY AGREE HERE! :thumbsup:Quote:
People believe what they want to believe , I choose not to believe in something that so obviously was written by maniacs ( evilbible.com )
Given the deliberate misinterpretations of scripture in the past,(inquisition/dark ages etc.) I can understand your opinion,but that doesn't invalidate the scriptures if interpreted correctly. Example,the hebrew word for cannabis is Kineboisin which means aromatic cane,not calamus as you read in Exodus;30:23. Calamus had no aromatic value at all! THAT'S a mistranslation or misinterpretation! Here's a REAL interpretation! In Revelation;1:7 it says when Christ returns,EVERY EYE SHALL SEE HIM! and in ;11:9,it says the whole world will SEE the 2 witnesses bein' killed and will celebrate their deaths! It wasn't that long ago that people wondered how the hell that was possible for the whole world to witness these two events which have yet to happen. NOW WE KNOW! Through T.V. and the INTERNET! Now THAT'S a CORRECT interpretation of a prophecy made in 96 A.D.! (C.E.)Quote:
And I really don't buy prophets of any kind.
http://www.equalrights4all.org/books...ml#nostradamus :D I believe you know Chris Conrad who wrote a book on Nostradamus. Here's a POTHEAD who believes in prophecy!:thumbsup:Quote:
Nostradamus was more reliable and I still think it's a question of interpretation of what are at best vagueries.
the #2 means truth or solid. just as the beast that kills them is representing a world goverment the 2 witnesses are a truth baised religion that as the bible says spits fire from there mouth, this is there word that this religion is teaching.
Some of you guys have read or watched too much 'Left Behind'.
I've never seen it.
The burden is on you to provide proof , try taking it off a .edu or maybe try a history book...Your forgetting some of those monarchies went down hard during certain periods.
Also you dismiss my link (which has all the pertinent info your saying I didnt provide even though the onus is on you to prove such,which means providing a proper cite) without so much as a comment other than "boorrring" I know facts are boring thats why they're facts....HAR
Oh as to your response to psychocat , I'm sure that YOU mark are able to decipher the scripture properly and not the thousands before actually educated on the subject....(and yes there is a lot of twisting its because there is alot of contradictory passages in the aforementioned "bibles")....
Your "proof" is a site owned and operated by private individuals who have a familial interest(not to mention monetary) in linking themselves to the "first families" despite the massive historical evidence available at ANY school or ANY library....also its based on writings in the bible and alot of assumptions as to the actual geneology of aforementioned people. Using the bible as proof of whats in the bible is pure idiocy. Big boys indeed....Also other people who believe in prophecy do not validate your assumptions. This is yet another in a long line of fallacies from you....
your derision of my ad hominem's is ironic considering your engaging in them yourself (and nothing wrong with that as long as you provide an arguement...)
I stand by my ignoramus conclusion. Next you'll be linking to Phelps site as proof god hates gays....
May I suggest for future use, you make use of this site....www.fallacyfiles.org