Top Ten reasons Hi-jackers were FAKE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Its a Plant
Anyone that denies the fact that a percentage of Muslims want us dead for not being Muslim is ignorant themselves. You can't just toss those extremists aside when talking about the religion, and more so, when you talk of it like it's a peaceful religion. It's not.
The issue with Islam is the fact that Mohammad was illiterate.
All his visions and teachings were dependent on another to transcribe it. What do you get? Many scriptures that could've been written by some delusional violent jackass, and the teachings are either (a) accepted by extremists and milked (b) argued that Islam is nothing but a flithy and violent religion.
I believe the essence of every religion is meant to achieve peace. When humanity twists their teachings to their own benefit, you have chaos.
Top Ten reasons Hi-jackers were FAKE
Quote:
Originally Posted by thcbongman
The issue with Islam is the fact that Mohammad was illiterate.
All his visions and teachings were dependent on another to transcribe it. What do you get? Many scriptures that could've been written by some delusional violent jackass, and the teachings are either (a) accepted by extremists and milked (b) argued that Islam is nothing but a flithy and violent religion.
I believe the essence of every religion is meant to achieve peace. When humanity twists their teachings to their own benefit, you have chaos.
I completely agree with that last part, but the problem is that humanity has had their mitts on the teachings and written word from many religions for centuries now.
So, in my mind, that makes most religions today nothing more than a chaotic business hell-bent to either (a) make money, (b) carry out political agendas, or (c) brainwash the masses with a distorted version of that religion's "truth".
Don't get me wrong, I respect someone's decision to be religious, but at this point in my life, I haven't found one that's "for me" quite yet. I enjoy learning about other religions, but it seems the more I read, the more I'm turned off from the idea of a higher being. That's a whole other discussion though, lol.
Top Ten reasons Hi-jackers were FAKE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlboroman
AND THIS THREAD IS SO FAR OFF TOPIC IT DOESNT MATTER ANYMORE.
AS SOON AS BONG OPENED HIS MOUTH YOU ALL CHANGED THE SUBJECT AND WENT RIGHT ALONG FOLLOWING HIM DOWN THE SORRY ASS PATH OF BAD COMMUNICATION.
NOW INSTEAD OF TALKING ABOUT WHETHER THOSE REASONS AS STATED IN THE VIDEO ARE FALSE, OR TRUE, OR PROPAGANDA FROM EITHER SIDE, WE ARE AGAIN DEBATEING WHETHER RELIGION HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE WAR.
YES IT DOES, BUT THATS NOT WHAT THIS THREAD WAS MADE FOR.
BONG IS VIGILANT WITH HIS PERSONAL ATTACKS, IF YOU WANT TO STAY ON TOPIC YOU HAVE TO BE JUST AS VIGILANT ABOUT IGNOREING HIM.
HONESTLY HE REMINDS ME OF AMSTERDAM WITH ALL THE ATTACKS AND BLIND FURY.
START THIS THREAD OVER CAUSE THIS IS SOMETHING WORTH DISCUSSING, AS LONG AS IT STAYS ON TOPIC AND DOESNT GET DERAILED BY PERSONAL ATTACKS USED TO DO THAT EXACT THING.
Peace.
10) No names on passanger manifest...
9) No autopsy
8) up to 7 have been located since 9/11 alive... <--- that's hard to do after you fly into a building...
7) FBI still has same list of hi-jackers
6) Flagg's knowledge of the names of the Hi jackers
5) could not fly... much less fly the way the planes supposedly had.
4) Cell phone calls... phones don't work in planes... but alas eveyone got to call mommy to tell them ROLL ON .... right??
3) Flight 93's recording on passengers from the cock pit recorder...
2) the finial words of the bombers...
1) Moussoui's whole case and trial... funny how everyone forgot about him already... and how he wasn't involved at all yet, was the only person who we've caught and tried...
Alright back on topic...
Top Ten reasons Hi-jackers were FAKE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby
10) No names on passanger manifest...
9) No autopsy
8) up to 7 have been located since 9/11 alive... <--- that's hard to do after you fly into a building...
7) FBI still has same list of hi-jackers
6) Flagg's knowledge of the names of the Hi jackers
5) could not fly... much less fly the way the planes supposedly had.
4) Cell phone calls... phones don't work in planes... but alas eveyone got to call mommy to tell them ROLL ON .... right??
3) Flight 93's recording on passengers from the cock pit recorder...
2) the finial words of the bombers...
1) Moussoui's whole case and trial... funny how everyone forgot about him already... and how he wasn't involved at all yet, was the only person who we've caught and tried...
Alright back on topic...
All very good reason if ya ask me, but the real question is whether these are actual reasons.
There needs to be information produced for each point, I wouldnt know where to even begin to find it, im not an investigator.
In order to convince people it needs to be bullet proof, and even then some will just ignore it.
Peace.
Top Ten reasons Hi-jackers were FAKE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlboroman
AND THIS THREAD IS SO FAR OFF TOPIC IT DOESNT MATTER ANYMORE.
AS SOON AS BONG OPENED HIS MOUTH YOU ALL CHANGED THE SUBJECT AND WENT RIGHT ALONG FOLLOWING HIM DOWN THE SORRY ASS PATH OF BAD COMMUNICATION.
NOW INSTEAD OF TALKING ABOUT WHETHER THOSE REASONS AS STATED IN THE VIDEO ARE FALSE, OR TRUE, OR PROPAGANDA FROM EITHER SIDE, WE ARE AGAIN DEBATEING WHETHER RELIGION HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE WAR.
YES IT DOES, BUT THATS NOT WHAT THIS THREAD WAS MADE FOR.
BONG IS VIGILANT WITH HIS PERSONAL ATTACKS, IF YOU WANT TO STAY ON TOPIC YOU HAVE TO BE JUST AS VIGILANT ABOUT IGNOREING HIM.
HONESTLY HE REMINDS ME OF AMSTERDAM WITH ALL THE ATTACKS AND BLIND FURY.
START THIS THREAD OVER CAUSE THIS IS SOMETHING WORTH DISCUSSING, AS LONG AS IT STAYS ON TOPIC AND DOESNT GET DERAILED BY PERSONAL ATTACKS USED TO DO THAT EXACT THING.
Peace.
This thread STARTED with an insult...why try to pin all this crap on him? I tend to agree with his first reply.
Have a good one!:thumbsup:
Top Ten reasons Hi-jackers were FAKE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
This thread STARTED with an insult...why try to pin all this crap on him? I tend to agree with his first reply.
Have a good one!:thumbsup:
I think you took it all wrong... I was doing it as a favor for you because I know you don't like to read all the threads... I just think you misunderstand me... but thanks for changing the topic once again.
Well, does anyone want to talk about a specific number?? I like the fact that they found the passport of a hi-jacker, but haven't found a body. But we can go with any of them from 1 - 10...
Top Ten reasons Hi-jackers were FAKE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby
I think you took it all wrong... I was doing it as a favor for you because I know you don't like to read all the threads... I just think you misunderstand me... but thanks for changing the topic once again.
Well, does anyone want to talk about a specific number?? I like the fact that they found the passport of a hi-jacker, but haven't found a body. But we can go with any of them from 1 - 10...
I'll talk about a number........how bout 30? Keep it up.
Top Ten reasons Hi-jackers were FAKE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby
I think you took it all wrong... I was doing it as a favor for you because I know you don't like to read all the threads... I just think you misunderstand me... but thanks for changing the topic once again.
Well, does anyone want to talk about a specific number?? I like the fact that they found the passport of a hi-jacker, but haven't found a body. But we can go with any of them from 1 - 10...
Let's put it this way.
If any of these guys were right, had actually interviewed these hijackers that are alive, wouldn't it be a little necessary to take their pictures, perhaps even fingerprint them to provide their identities, and provide a nice side by side comparison?
I'm inclined to believe in hard evidence more than some white guy with ideas. Everyone has an idea. Not everyone has proof. I would think that these think-tank guys would be a little brighter than coming up with some empty rhetoric.
Frankly, I'm don't believe everything in the official 9/11 story. I think they were some suspicious circumstances involved. I simply don't believe in theories with lack of evidence to support it.
Top Ten reasons Hi-jackers were FAKE
Quote:
Originally Posted by thcbongman
Let's put it this way.
If any of these guys were right, had actually interviewed these hijackers that are alive, wouldn't it be a little necessary to take their pictures, perhaps even fingerprint them to provide their identities, and provide a nice side by side comparison?
I'm inclined to believe in hard evidence more than some white guy with ideas. Everyone has an idea. Not everyone has proof. I would think that these think-tank guys would be a little brighter than coming up with some empty rhetoric.
Frankly, I'm don't believe everything in the official 9/11 story. I think they were some suspicious circumstances involved. I simply don't believe in theories with lack of evidence to support it.
It wasn't Alex Jones who interviewed them... It was the BBC... and it is well documented... you just have to google it to find the interviews. Just because people are spoon feeding you the information doesn't mean it isn't out there. I think you are mistaking lack of evidence with your lack of willingness to look for the evidence.
If you can't find enough proof that they are alive, where is the proof that they are dead? Why are you content with believing they died without evidence yet push aside the fact they are alive because you don't see a picture of them side by side with fingerprints??
Top Ten reasons Hi-jackers were FAKE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
This thread STARTED with an insult...why try to pin all this crap on him? I tend to agree with his first reply.
Have a good one!:thumbsup:
Rather than get off topic again, I'll simply say my opinion stands uncorrected.
