Printable View
Well, I'm sorry that we don't have room in our apartment for you to crash, but we'll DEFINITLY party! I just had some red shit that kicks ass. :dance:Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
We'll go to Fraunces Tavern, in lower Manhattan, which was bombed in the 70's by FALN, a P.R. terrorist group. It's historic, and there are MANY places you have to see - the military stuff, particularly regarding the Revolutionary War, alone is worth it.
VERY cool, we'll definately be keeping in touch!:thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat
not arguing with the fascist part? hmm... i guess he has convinced you of something...Quote:
Originally Posted by Bong30
Hey blackdog....special thanks for the kind words!!:thumbsup:
You have my respect! Have a good one!:thumbsup:
The towers like most high rise buildings were designed to sway. If they were not allowed to sway the wind could actually knock them down.Quote:
Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat
Oh and GS, i agree with you and all but dont go hating on people just cause they don't agree with you. You have to educate people, not just spew all that stuff that you believe. Maybe try posting loose change or something so people who do not believe what you or i do will maybe see things from our perspective.
you guys are spending way to much time trying to argue with a nutjob and wild conspiracies that are flowing! its kinda like peeing on a fire, just doesn't work. stop wasting your time with these idiots and go smoke another bowl!:pimp: :thumbsup:
So, if you agree that the wind could knock them down, do you believe that it's simply impossible for a huge jetliner to do it, without bombs or other assistance?Quote:
Originally Posted by halo
No, i am saying that the buildings are designed to sway in the wind otherwise they could be damaged or fall down ( I think i heard that on history channel or something.) I do not think it is impossible, but the facts do not really add up in the official story. I mean the buildings did not even burn for 2 hours. And then they fell. WTF?!?! I could understand them collapsing if the plane somehow crashed towards the base of the building. But still that way it would not collapse the way it did. I just do not understand the floor falling on top of another floor theory. It just doesn't make sense to me. If someone will show me a case where this has happened. i.e. floor falling on top of other floors causing collapse. Then i will greatly reconsider my ideas on how the towers fell.Quote:
Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat
I do not have time to attain an advanced degree in architecture, followed by years of work in the field. I'm putting my trust in people that have done this - and I met somebody like that in NYC, on the subway, shortly before the Towers fell. He predicted what would happen with pinpoint accuracy, explained the process to me quickly, and then I had to change trains.Quote:
Originally Posted by halo
There are other resources to check this. I have not bookmarked them, because I accepted what happened due to my experience that day. So did the Mayor, and just about everybody else involved in this tragedy - including the victims' families. But, at least you are open to the possibility that the towers fell from the impact and destruction of the crash - which is a damn sight better than some of the people here.
Wait!!!!!....has the bush administration proved to any1 what happen on 911 weres CONdi at saying they have proof, WHERE!!!!!!!!!and is not the bush administraitors guilty for not stopping the terrorist attack, bush told FBI to stand down from looking for AlCIAduh, USAma,,,Wait one more why were all the warnings ignored... its just question guys get over yourselves, i bet none of you look into the 911 you just keep the government story alive because you dont want to fuk up your thinking, but thats good though