Blunt Vs Joint?

neither....I strictly smoke bowls thank you very much. Actually I can't even get high off joints....not enough weed I guess....or maybe none of my friends can roll them right, who knows...

if im smoking alone a joint but with a couple other people then a blunt

whats wrong with you joint people???
blunts are the shit
blunts are the shit
blunts are the shit
blunts are the shit

I am a true Blunt fan but I can see the preference given to joints when your in a hurry and do not want to go through the whole crack, scrape and fill process. Even though thats part of the expierence if you ask me! Also I find joint canoo alot more often.

both are always good. but i usually prefer a blunt:D

Filtered Joints for me. I hate salad shooters, although i prefer my 'cano:vap_smiley:

I smoked cig's for 20 years and been cig free for 7. Boys on the job rolled a blunt. Nasty ass thing, if I want a cigar I will start smoking again. Good thing it was shit weed.

I do not want tobacco touching my chronic that cost way too much. If I'm worried about papper I buy hemp pappers.

I know you can slobber on a joint but slobber on a blunt and pass it my way. Hey why don't you just come on over and spit a big luggy in my mouth. No Thanks!!!!!

Blunts no doubt! They burn better, you can fill 'em with more bud, it's a more enjoyable smoke, and when you pass it around the tip doesn't get wet. That's so annoying.

:stoned:

I prefer joints because they're the next best thing after a vaporizer or edibles. Plus I don't want tobacco of any sort mixed in with my bud. This NORML study helped me too...

"Surprisingly, the unfiltered joint outperformed all devices except the vaporizers, with a ratio of about 1 part cannabinoids to 13 parts tar..."

"Disappointingly, waterpipes performed uniformly worse than the unfiltered joint. The least bad waterpipe, the bong, produced 30% more tar per cannabinoids than the unfiltered joint. Ironically, the pipe with the electric mixer scored by far the worst of any device. This suggests that water filtration is actually counterproductive, apparently because water tends to absorb THC more readily than noxious tars. Like the waterpipes, the cigarette filter also performed worse than the unfiltered joint, by about 30%. Researchers speculate this is because cannabinoids are exceptionally sticky and adhere to other solids. Hence, any filtration system that picks up particulates is likely also to screen out cannabinoids."

"The percentage of total THC delivered to the user is called the THC transfer rate. The unfiltered joint scored surprisingly well in smoking efficiency, coming in second place with a transfer rate close to 20%"

Marijuana Water Pipe and Vaporizer Study

[Revised February 2000]
Dale Gieringer, Ph.D.
California NORML, 2215-R Market St. Suite 278
San Francisco CA 94114 tel: (415) 563-5858
E-mail: [email protected]

I can only imagine since they didn't test a blunt that the results would just be worse because of the tobacco factor.

:hippy:

It depends on the bud....