they'd never do that. i dont need to form an arguement in the cia's defense, i dont need to research to see if it's true.
they'd never do that. isnt that enough to debate?
all hail cynicism
Printable View
they'd never do that. i dont need to form an arguement in the cia's defense, i dont need to research to see if it's true.
they'd never do that. isnt that enough to debate?
all hail cynicism
ive questions for almighty youQuote:
Originally Posted by BlueCat
can a nation not make a mistake?
and cannot a nation try to correct a mistake,
for example
helped saddam foolishly once.
then kicked his regime over later ?
i mean dont you supposed to FIX something if you break it ?
could that be what is going on ?
or has your blinded by hatred anti usa anything mind closed up?
please keep it simple its too early for complicated readings
peace
we've *mistakenly* helped lots of dictators achieve power and hold it; mao, hitler, stalin, saddam, bin laden was our pal, the list goes on and on and on and on...at what point does it stop being a mistake?
it seems more likely to me that we're using these people for some other purpose (world empire maybe, imf/world bank control of the world), and then using some fake theater to demonize them in our media.
"Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing [a people] to slavery."
--Thomas Jefferson: Rights of British America, 1774
never will it be a mistake,when your dealing with an evil empire like the failed soviet union it makes perfect sense to aid smaller problems when dealing with a global problem like communism WAS.
we built up and aided that evil empire the soviet union as well. this is a good book for anyone who's interested. the rockefeller file by gary allen, published in the 70's.
i can't remember if it's this book, or another gary allen book, where he talks about drills of the pentagon being hit with a jumbo jet that took place in the early 70's.
http://boards.cannabis.com/showthrea...ckefeller+file
You blind blind blind man.Quote:
Originally Posted by amsterdam
If communism ever was a global problem in the 50s and 60s, it's entirely the US's fault. Back then, the concept of empire and colonies was still quite valid, and the US wanted an empire of its own. What the most logical choice? Central/South America of course. The US installed and supported a series of right-wing dictators who shared their wealth witha select few elite, while 90% of the population died of hunger. It happened in many many nations.
What choice did the starving people have? they turn to communism, whose theory promises wealth and health for all. If you've been repressed and oppressed for generations, wouldn't that sound nice to you? That's why communism became a problem right on the US's doorstep, that's why Cuba happened, that's why civil wars raged for decades in some small countries... That's why Saddam was in power, Pinochet, Batista (pre Castro), and all those other right-wing dictators you all seem to like so much.
Learn to observe and think for yourself, I know it's hard.... :rolleyes:
everything is our fault dont you know.
communism=failure
democracy+capitalism=the youngest,richest,most powerful nation on earth
communism is just an excuse to consolidate peoples' wealth into the hands of world banks and leaders and rich, established families. it works just as well as fascism. they work together.
i agree with almost all of what you said...but both sides are controlled by the same people...both the 'left' and the 'right'...
if people are serious enough to want a world empire, than they're going to have controlled opposition to co-opt the population into thinking they have an escape from the current tyranny, right?
they get people to run right back into their hands.
multiple trillions of dollars of debt and hundreds of billions of dollars in trade deficits=wealth?
wow, maybe i should get a thousand credit cards and max them all out so i can get rich?
you'd be correct if it wasn't for the unconstitutional federal reserve. as soon as that took over our money supply, it was downhill.
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.
wow, jefferson's sounding like a conspiracy theorist. how dare him speak of our godlike banks like that. maybe he should have just left the country if he hated it so much!
- Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802) ; later published in The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill (1809)