In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by birdgirl73
You're not alone, Darkside. I find Krogith completely incomprehensible. What little I can decipher rarely makes much sense even when I can understand what he was attempting to say.
His post after the one you quoted from was equally incoherent.
For me, at least, he's in the same league as most of the great philosophers - or even better.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
There is no reason on Earth for America (and us Brits, I'm not blaming it all on the USA) to be in Iraq. Under Saddam's regime there was no Islamic threat to the rest of the world. The real reason that the USA is in there is entirely due to oil, nothing else. I'm all for wiping out the idea of Islamic fundamentalism, it's completely backward. The way to do that is to make sure that conditions do not exist in which it can flourish. That's not what is happening in Iraq, rather the opposite. Bring all our tropps home now and stop interfering in other people's affairs. We have enough trouble at home (both in the UK and the USA) to be going on with. Let the muslim world do as it pleases provided they do not bother us. Make this abundantly clear to them. Let them know that we will wipe them off the face of the earth if they wish to go down that route...other than that let's leave them be.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignatius
The real reason that the USA is in there is entirely due to oil, nothing else.
If this was about oil we would be in Saudi Arabia and Iran. In the big picture, Iraq doesn't have enough oil to make a difference.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Iraq has plenty of Oil, also the USA needs a presence in that part of the world in case it goes tits up with Saudi . It's all about oil man.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignatius
Iraq has plenty of Oil, also the USA needs a presence in that part of the world in case it goes tits up with Saudi . It's all about oil man.
Nonsense, thats a simpletons view of the world, we already had a "presence" in Saudi Arabia, Quater and AEI (were all the oil is) before the war started.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
I agree with Ozarks, the war has nothing to do with oil. Nor terrorism, nor having a prescence in the Middle East. The war with Iraq is all about ego, namely George W. Bush's ego. Dubya had to do something to make his presidency noteworthy. He wanted to be the guy to take down Saddam. He would have figured a way to get us into Iraq one way or another. If Bin Laden had turned over a new leaf and became a florist, and Saddam turned over his "extensive stockpile" (LOL) of WMD's, Dubya would have sent the troops in the name of preventing camel abuse.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
TOROG ... you and I are WISE men ... :thumbsup:
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Deouncing liberals as the enemy is trademark in a fascist nation.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
No, my view of the world is not that of a simpleton. But just for sport Ozarks why don't you tell me what the USA is doing in Iraq.
In your own time and all that.
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignatius
No, my view of the world is not that of a simpleton. But just for sport Ozarks why don't you tell me what the USA is doing in Iraq.
In your own time and all that.
This is my thoughts not Os.
We went to Iraq..... Pimple popping analogy
Afganistan is one finger............
Iraq Is the other finger........
Iran Is the pimple on the ass of the world.
We need perfect popping position, on IRAN.
Fuck the WMDs just say we went to Iraq to Fight Radical Islam.
