100% Proof About 9/11

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eg420ne

Well Al CIA duh said that moussaoui was inept so they cut him out- plus no telling what kind of torture they used-check out this video saying moussaoui may have been wearing a stunbelt http://www.total411.info/

---

the video your directing me to is the one i posted :confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StashDaCash

Few points to make ....First with the amount of fuel those planes have that fire burned hot and burned for a long time...Second skyscrapers are designed to collapse in on themselves

---

They each burned for less than an hour and a half!... jet fuel burns at a maximum of 2000 deg, while it takes around 3000 to melt steel. Even if the skyscrapers are designed to collapse on themselves, they didnt not "fall" - proof= the time it took for them to fall, i believe it is around 8 seconds, thats freefall time [there has been a study on it]

Sign the petition to get some answers!: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takea...141667399#body

Those where 747 planes. Ive flown on a few in my life and if you saw the size of these mo fos you could see how they caused destruction. Plus the camel jockies planned it so they jacked 747s with tanks full of gas.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by graph

And all three buildings imploded, not exploded. Exploding would make more sense, but it didn't happen. There must have been explosions from the bottom, plus the fact that all walls of the buildig were "pulled" toward the center. Personally, I think the conspiracy theory is saying that memebers of a terrorist organization rammed planes into it. Seems more believable it was planned out by a more powerful organization.

---

i agree.

Moussaoui has mad holes in his story. he said his partner was supposed to be richard reid(the shoe bomber) but he was in europe at the time. i think we may have a patsy or a loose end on our hands.

So what about all the deaths that occured that day? I find it hard to believe that the government would stage something that would cause so many deaths of innocent people.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud

I agree with ya, the majority are peace lovin' people. Which all the more proves my point about what outrage they would feel.

Have a good one!:thumbsup:

---

Yes most of them are usually [eace loving people but with those comic strips a while back they were extremely violent. It's the Shiites(sp) who are the extremists the peacful ones are the Sunnis.

No offense to all you conspiracy dumb asses but unless you have a degree in physics then shut the fuck up because you dont know ANYTHING.

1. Imagine how much that building weighed, and imagine all that weight being dropped thousands of feet, if that hit a person it could very well have sent a few projectile bones flying out of one of the windows, just think about it....its not even that unlikely

2. The buildings should have fallen over instead of collapsed? You sir are on some bad drugs that have completely scrambled your brains.

3. A HUGE PIECE OF ALMOST SOLID METAL FILLED WITH A HIGHLY EXPLOSIVE LIQUID SLAMS INTO A BUILDING WITH A FEW STEEL SUPPORTS THAT WERE HOLDNG UP HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CONCRETE AND DESK JOCKIES, is it safe to say that there is no possible way for something like that EVER to fall down, maybe you should get a grip on reality moron, think about how buildings start, first off a bunch of contractors make bids to build it and the lowest one gets it, the only way this contractor can provide a lower price than his competitors is to sacrifice material quality, worker wage etc which means that at least a few corners were cut during the the construction durrrrrrrrrrr.

4. I was gonna explain the implosion thing, but Phsycho4Bud did a nice job of making some of you look like asses (thanks for being way ahead of me) why would the building explode because a plane hit it? thats just stupid there was AN explosion WHEN the plane hit it, because a plane moves very fast and to do this it burns something called JETFUEL!!!!!!!! or kerosene that might just be combustible.

and im too fucking tired to finish explaining to all you dolts the simplicity of the situation because im all whacked out on percocets

Im not asking you to believe in something blindly im just telling you that the facts are there and if you ignore them then its you're own damn fault for being a retard (and looking like one)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by xblackdogx

the video your directing me to is the one i posted :confused:



They each burned for less than an hour and a half!... jet fuel burns at a maximum of 2000 deg, while it takes around 3000 to melt steel. Even if the skyscrapers are designed to collapse on themselves, they didnt not "fall" - proof= the time it took for them to fall, i believe it is around 8 seconds, thats freefall time [there has been a study on it]

Sign the petition to get some answers!: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takea...141667399#body

---

You spout out misinformation that you hear and automatically believe it to be true, jet fuel DOES burn at 2k degrees and it does take roughly 3k degrees to melt steel BUT if you werent a pathetic moron you would know that if you contain a heat source it will continue to rise

think about an oven, just a simple household oven, if you can even muster that much brain power. Now the oven heats up to set temp, then does the flame thats heating it just stay on? No but yet the oven remains at a constant temp...so what happens when you keep adding fire in that contained space in the oven? it will get hotter and hotter even if the natural gas has a max temp of 500 degrees you can still heat the oven to much hotter than that. the same SIMPLE effect could have happened in the WTC towers, what happens when you get an entire level of a building thats still almost entirely sealed off and fill it with jet fuel and spark it up??? huh i wonder :cool:



any other questions?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by God v2.0

You spout out misinformation that you hear and automatically believe it to be true, jet fuel DOES burn at 2k degrees and it does take roughly 3k degrees to melt steel BUT if you werent a pathetic moron you would know that if you contain a heat source it will continue to rise

think about an oven, just a simple household oven, if you can even muster that much brain power. Now the oven heats up to set temp, then does the flame thats heating it just stay on? No but yet the oven remains at a constant temp...so what happens when you keep adding fire in that contained space in the oven? it will get hotter and hotter even if the natural gas has a max temp of 500 degrees you can still heat the oven to much hotter than that. the same SIMPLE effect could have happened in the WTC towers, what happens when you get an entire level of a building thats still almost entirely sealed off and fill it with jet fuel and spark it up??? huh i wonder :cool:



any other questions?

---

i'm sorry, i should have stated, jet fuel can burn at a MAXIMUM of 2000 deg... and i have no degree in science... but search 9/11 scholars, they have researched everything we are talking about. do you discredit their degrees?
http://911review.org/ScholarsforTruthabout911/
please entertain yourself with the articles written by PHD holders

Quote:

---

No offense to all you conspiracy dumb asses but unless you have a degree in physics then shut the fuck up because you dont know ANYTHING.

---

give me a chuffin break. why do you think you are right and everyone else is wrong? noone is certain what happened that day but evidence and unanswered questions point to inside job.